Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 21–23 | Cite as

In-House Plagiarism and Editorial Unaccountability

Letter to the Editor

Notes

Conflict of Interests

We declare to have had academic links with a local colleague to whom our remarks are primarily addressed.

Author’s Contributions

HR wrote the first draft of the manuscript; both authors did corrections and approved the final version.

References

  1. Alfaro-Toloza, P., P. Mayta-Tristan, and A.J. Rodriguez-Morales. 2013. Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: A Latin American perspective. Current Medical Research and Opinion 29(2): 99–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, M.S., E.A. Ronning, R. De Vries, and B.C. Martinson. 2007. The perverse effects of competition on scientists’ work and relationships. Science and Engineering Ethics 13(4): 437–461.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Balhara, Y.P.S. 2011. Rights of authors: Do we need guidelines for editors as well? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8(3): 225–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. 1979. http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/berne/trtdocs_wo001.html. Accessed May 16, 2014.Google Scholar
  5. Committee on Publication Ethics. 2011. Code of conduct and best practice guidelines for journal editors 2011. http://publicationethics.org/resources/code-conduct. Accessed May 16, 2014.Google Scholar
  6. Cooke, S.J., and N.W.R. Lapointe. 2012. Addressing editor(ial) malpractice in scientific journals. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution 5(2): 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cyranoski, D. 2014. Cell-induced stress. Nature 511(7508): 140–143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. De Vries, R., M.S. Anderson, and B.C. Martinson. 2006. Normal misbehavior: Scientists talk about the ethics of research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 1(1): 43–50.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Editorial. 2009. Authorship policies. Nature 458(7242): 1078.Google Scholar
  10. Fenning, T.N. 2004. Fraud offers big rewards for relatively little risk. Nature 427(6973): 393.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Godlee, F. 2004. Dealing with editorial misconduct. New code of conduct for editors is a first step in self regulation. British Medical Journal 329(7478): 1301–1302.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Light, D.W., and R.N. Warburton. 2008. Ethical standards for healthcare journal editors: A case report and recommendations. Harvard Health Policy Review 9(1): 58–67.Google Scholar
  13. Lins, L., and F.M. Carvalho. 2014. Scientific integrity in Brazil. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11(3): 283–287.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Marusić, A., T. Bates, A. Anić, and M. Marusić. 2006. How the structure of contribution disclosure statements affects validity of authorship: A randomized study in a general medical journal. Current Medical Research and Opinion 22(6): 1035–1044.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Monin, B. 2007. Holier than me? Threatening social comparison in the moral domain. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale 20(1): 53–68.Google Scholar
  16. Nature. 2013. Guide to publication policies of the Nature journals. http://www.nature.com/authors/gta.pdf. Accessed May 16, 2014.Google Scholar
  17. Resnik, D.B. 2013. Plagiarism among collaborators. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 20(1): 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rivera, H. 2009. Editors’ malpractice: Forward submitted letters (to the concerned authors), then reject them. Accountability in Research 16(6): 331–333.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rivera, H., M.G. Domínguez, and E. Matute. 2006. Follow-up of an intelligent odd-mannered teenager with del(3)(p26): Remarks on authorship and ethical commitment. Genetic Counseling 17(4): 401–405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Scott-Lichter, D. 2012. Authorship disputes: Me first, me equally, me too, not me. Learned Publishing 25(2): 83–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith, R.A. 2008. A ripping yarn of editorial misconduct. The BMJ blog, October 21. http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2008/10/21/richard-smith-a-ripping-yarn-of-editorial-misconduct/. Accessed May 16, 2014.Google Scholar
  22. Sovacool, B.K. 2008. Exploring scientific misconduct: Isolated individuals, impure institutions, or an inevitable idiom of modern science? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5(4): 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stretton, S., N.J. Bramich, J.R. Keys, et al. 2012. Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: A systematic, retrospective study. Current Medical Research and Opinion 28(10): 1575–1583.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Teixeira, A.A.C., and M. Fontes da Costa. 2010. Who rules the ruler? On the misconduct of journal editors. Journal of Academic Ethics 8(2): 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vasconcelos, S., J. Leta, L. Costa, A. Pinto, and M.M. Sorenson. 2009. Discussing plagiarism in Latin American science: Brazilian researchers begin to address an ethical issue. EMBO Reports 10(7): 677–682.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wager, E. 2011. Coping with scientific misconduct. British Medical Journal 343: d6586. doi:10.1136/bmj.d6586.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Horacio Rivera
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ana Isabel Vásquez-Velásquez
    • 3
  1. 1.División de Genética, CIBOInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialGuadalajaraMexico
  2. 2.Departamento de Biología Molecular y Genómica, CUCSUniversidad de GuadalajaraGuadalajaraMexico
  3. 3.División de Genética, CIBOInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialGuadalajaraMexico

Personalised recommendations