Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 21–23 | Cite as

In-House Plagiarism and Editorial Unaccountability

Letter to the Editor


Conflict of Interests

We declare to have had academic links with a local colleague to whom our remarks are primarily addressed.

Author’s Contributions

HR wrote the first draft of the manuscript; both authors did corrections and approved the final version.


  1. Alfaro-Toloza, P., P. Mayta-Tristan, and A.J. Rodriguez-Morales. 2013. Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: A Latin American perspective. Current Medical Research and Opinion 29(2): 99–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, M.S., E.A. Ronning, R. De Vries, and B.C. Martinson. 2007. The perverse effects of competition on scientists’ work and relationships. Science and Engineering Ethics 13(4): 437–461.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Balhara, Y.P.S. 2011. Rights of authors: Do we need guidelines for editors as well? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8(3): 225–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. 1979. Accessed May 16, 2014.Google Scholar
  5. Committee on Publication Ethics. 2011. Code of conduct and best practice guidelines for journal editors 2011. Accessed May 16, 2014.Google Scholar
  6. Cooke, S.J., and N.W.R. Lapointe. 2012. Addressing editor(ial) malpractice in scientific journals. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution 5(2): 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cyranoski, D. 2014. Cell-induced stress. Nature 511(7508): 140–143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. De Vries, R., M.S. Anderson, and B.C. Martinson. 2006. Normal misbehavior: Scientists talk about the ethics of research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 1(1): 43–50.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Editorial. 2009. Authorship policies. Nature 458(7242): 1078.Google Scholar
  10. Fenning, T.N. 2004. Fraud offers big rewards for relatively little risk. Nature 427(6973): 393.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Godlee, F. 2004. Dealing with editorial misconduct. New code of conduct for editors is a first step in self regulation. British Medical Journal 329(7478): 1301–1302.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Light, D.W., and R.N. Warburton. 2008. Ethical standards for healthcare journal editors: A case report and recommendations. Harvard Health Policy Review 9(1): 58–67.Google Scholar
  13. Lins, L., and F.M. Carvalho. 2014. Scientific integrity in Brazil. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11(3): 283–287.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Marusić, A., T. Bates, A. Anić, and M. Marusić. 2006. How the structure of contribution disclosure statements affects validity of authorship: A randomized study in a general medical journal. Current Medical Research and Opinion 22(6): 1035–1044.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Monin, B. 2007. Holier than me? Threatening social comparison in the moral domain. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale 20(1): 53–68.Google Scholar
  16. Nature. 2013. Guide to publication policies of the Nature journals. Accessed May 16, 2014.Google Scholar
  17. Resnik, D.B. 2013. Plagiarism among collaborators. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 20(1): 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rivera, H. 2009. Editors’ malpractice: Forward submitted letters (to the concerned authors), then reject them. Accountability in Research 16(6): 331–333.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rivera, H., M.G. Domínguez, and E. Matute. 2006. Follow-up of an intelligent odd-mannered teenager with del(3)(p26): Remarks on authorship and ethical commitment. Genetic Counseling 17(4): 401–405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Scott-Lichter, D. 2012. Authorship disputes: Me first, me equally, me too, not me. Learned Publishing 25(2): 83–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith, R.A. 2008. A ripping yarn of editorial misconduct. The BMJ blog, October 21. Accessed May 16, 2014.Google Scholar
  22. Sovacool, B.K. 2008. Exploring scientific misconduct: Isolated individuals, impure institutions, or an inevitable idiom of modern science? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5(4): 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stretton, S., N.J. Bramich, J.R. Keys, et al. 2012. Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: A systematic, retrospective study. Current Medical Research and Opinion 28(10): 1575–1583.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Teixeira, A.A.C., and M. Fontes da Costa. 2010. Who rules the ruler? On the misconduct of journal editors. Journal of Academic Ethics 8(2): 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vasconcelos, S., J. Leta, L. Costa, A. Pinto, and M.M. Sorenson. 2009. Discussing plagiarism in Latin American science: Brazilian researchers begin to address an ethical issue. EMBO Reports 10(7): 677–682.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wager, E. 2011. Coping with scientific misconduct. British Medical Journal 343: d6586. doi:10.1136/bmj.d6586.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Horacio Rivera
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ana Isabel Vásquez-Velásquez
    • 3
  1. 1.División de Genética, CIBOInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialGuadalajaraMexico
  2. 2.Departamento de Biología Molecular y Genómica, CUCSUniversidad de GuadalajaraGuadalajaraMexico
  3. 3.División de Genética, CIBOInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialGuadalajaraMexico

Personalised recommendations