Advertisement

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 115–127 | Cite as

“With Human Health It’s a Global Thing”: Canadian Perspectives on Ethics in the Global Governance of an Influenza Pandemic

  • Alison K. ThompsonEmail author
  • Maxwell J. Smith
  • Christopher W. McDougall
  • Cécile Bensimon
  • Daniel Felipe Perez
Original Research

Abstract

We live in an era where our health is linked to that of others across the globe, and nothing brings this home better than the specter of a pandemic. This paper explores the findings of town hall meetings associated with the Canadian Program of Research on Ethics in a Pandemic (CanPREP), in which focus groups met to discuss issues related to the global governance of an influenza pandemic. Two competing discourses were found to be at work: the first was based upon an economic rationality and the second upon a humanitarian rationality. The implications for public support and the long-term sustainability of new global norms, networks, and regulations in global public health are discussed.

Keywords

Global health Pandemic influenza Global health ethics Solidarity Deliberative methods 

References

  1. Benatar, S.R. 2005. Moral imagination: The missing component in global health. PLoS Medicine 2(12): e400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020400.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Benatar, S., A.S. Daar, and P.A. Singer. 2003. Global health ethics: The rationale for mutual caring. International Affairs 79(1): 107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benatar, S., S. Gill, and I. Bakker. 2009. Making progress in global health: The need for new paradigms. International Affairs 85(2): 347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bensimon, C., M. Smith, D. Pisartchik, S. Sahni, and R. Upshur. 2012. The duty to care in an influenza pandemic: A qualitative study of Canadian public perspectives. Social Science and Medicine 75(12): 2425–2430.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. 2010. Tri-council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf. Accessed November 12, 2013.
  6. Catterall, M., and P. Maclaran. 1997. Focus group data and qualitative analysis programs: Coding the moving picture as well as the snapshots. Sociological Research Online 2(1). www.socresonline.org.uk/2/1/6.html. Accessed November 15, 2013.
  7. Garoon, J.P., and P.S. Duggan. 2008. Discourses of disease, discourses of disadvantage: A critical analysis of national influenza preparedness plans. Social Science and Medicine 67(7): 1133–1142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gill, S., and I. Bakker. 2011. The global crisis and global health. In Global health and global health ethics, edited by S. Benatar and G. Brock, 221–238. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Glover, J. 2000. Humanity: A moral history of the twentieth century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Guba, E., and Y. Lincoln. 2005. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In Handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed., edited by N.K. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 191–216. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Habermas, J. 1970. Towards a theory of communicative competence. Inquiry 13(1–4): 360–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kitzinger, J. 1994. The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness 16(1): 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Labonte, R., T. Schrecker, and A. Sen Gupta. 2005. Health for some: Death, disease and disparity in a globalizing era. Toronto: Centre for Social Justice.Google Scholar
  14. The Lancet. 2007. Global solidarity needed in preparing for pandemic influenza. The Lancet 369(9561): 532.Google Scholar
  15. Lincoln, Y.S., and E.G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  16. McDougall, C., R. Upshur, and K. Wilson. 2008. Emerging norms for the control of emerging epidemics. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 86(8): 643–645.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. McDougall, C., and K. Wilson. 2007. Canada’s obligations to global public health security under the revised international health regulations. Health Law Review 16(1): 25–32.Google Scholar
  18. Millward, L. 2012. Focus groups. In Research methods in psychology, 4th ed., edited by G.M. Breakwell, J.A. Smith, and D.B. Wright, 411–437. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Morgan, D.L. 2010. Reconsidering the role of interaction in analyzing and reporting focus groups. Qualitative Health Research 20(5): 718–722.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Powers, M., and R. Faden. 2008. Social justice: The moral foundations of public health and health policy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Powers, M., and R. Faden. 2000. Inequalities in health, inequalities in health care: Four generations of discussion about justice and cost-effectiveness analysis. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10(2): 109–127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Santos-Preciado, J., C. Franco-Paredes, I. Hernandez-Flores, I. Tellez, C. Del Rio, and R. Tapia-Conyer. 2009. What have we learned from the novel influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in 2009 for strengthening pandemic influenza preparedness? Archives of Medical Research 40(8): 673–676.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sen, A.K. 1977. Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6(4): 317–344.Google Scholar
  24. Silva, D., J. Gibson, A. Robertson, et al. 2012. Priority setting of ICU resources in an influenza pandemic: A qualitative study of the Canadian public’s perspectives. BMC Public Health 12(1): 241.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Singer, P., S. Benatar, M. Bernstein, et al. 2003. Ethics and SARS: Lessons from Toronto. British Medical Journal 327(7427): 1342–1344.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, M., C. Bensimon, D. Perez, S. Sahni, and R. Upshur. 2012. Restrictive measures in an influenza pandemic: A qualitative study of public perspectives. Canadian Journal of Public Health 103(5): e348–e352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Stein, J.G. 2002. The cult of efficiency. Toronto: Anansi Press.Google Scholar
  28. Thompson, A. 2013. Human papilloma virus, vaccination and social justice: An analysis of a Canadian school-based vaccine program. Public Health Ethics 6(1): 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thompson, A., K. Faith, J. Gibson, and R. Upshur. 2006. Pandemic influenza preparedness: An ethical framework to guide decision-making. BMC Medical Ethics 7(1): 12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-7-12.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics Pandemic Influenza Working Group. 2005. Stand on guard for thee: Ethical considerations in preparedness planning for pandemic influenza. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  31. World Health Organization. 2008. Outbreak communications planning guide. Geneva: World Health Organization, NLM: WA 110. http://www.who.int/ihr/elibrary/WHOOutbreakCommsPlanngGuide.pdf.
  32. World Health Organization. 2010. Guidance on ethics of tuberculosis prevention, care and control. Geneva: World Health Organization, NLM: WF 200. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241500531_eng.pdf.
  33. Wilkinson, S. 1998. Focus group methodology: A review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 1(3): 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alison K. Thompson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maxwell J. Smith
    • 2
  • Christopher W. McDougall
    • 3
  • Cécile Bensimon
    • 4
  • Daniel Felipe Perez
    • 5
  1. 1.Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, Dalla Lana School of Public Health & Joint Centre for BioethicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Joint Centre for BioethicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Institute for Health Policy, Management and EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Joint Centre for BioethicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  5. 5.School of Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, York UniversityNorman Bethune CollegeTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations