Disclosure of Past Crimes: An Analysis of Mental Health Professionals’ Attitudes Towards Breaching Confidentiality
- 969 Downloads
Ensuring confidentiality is the cornerstone of trust within the doctor–patient relationship. However, health care providers have an obligation to serve not only their patient’s interests but also those of potential victims and society, resulting in circumstances where confidentiality must be breached. This article describes the attitudes of mental health professionals (MHPs) when patients disclose past crimes unknown to the justice system. Twenty-four MHPs working in Swiss prisons were interviewed. They shared their experiences concerning confidentiality practices and attitudes towards breaching confidentiality in prison. Qualitative analysis revealed that MHPs study different factors before deciding whether a past crime should be disclosed, including: (1) the type of therapy the prisoner-patient was seeking (i.e., whether it was court-ordered or voluntary), (2) the type of crime that is revealed (e.g., a serious crime, a crime of a similar nature to the original crime, or a minor crime), and (3) the danger posed by the prisoner-patient. Based on this study’s findings, risk assessment of dangerousness was one of the most important factors determining disclosures of past crimes, taking into consideration both the type of therapy and the crime involved. Attitudes of MHPs varied with regard to confidentiality rules and when to breach confidentiality, and there was thus a lack of consensus as to when and whether past crimes should be reported. Hence, legal and ethical requirements concerning confidentiality breaches must be made clear and known to physicians in order to guide them with difficult cases.
KeywordsConfidentiality Disclosure Prison Forensic doctor Past crimes
We thank all participants in the study for their time and commitment. We are grateful to A. Taberska, M. Ummel, and A. Eytan for their comments on the interview guide; V. Lauf, M. Ducotterd, C. Brueggen, and A. Taberska for their help with the interviews and transcriptions; and B. Gravier and A. Eytan for their general support.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
The study was funded by the Käthe-Zingg-Schwichtenberg Fund of the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences.
- Bruggen, M.C., A. Eytan, B. Gravier, and B.S. Elger. 2013. Medical and legal professionals’ attitudes towards confidentiality and disclosure of clinical information in forensic settings: A survey using case vignettes. Medicine, Science and the Law 53(3): 132–148.Google Scholar
- Bryman, A., and R.G. Burgess, eds. 1994. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
- Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers. 1998. Recommendation No. R (98) 7 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States concerning the ethical and organizational aspects of health care in prison. https://wcd.coe.int/com.instranet.InstraServlet?command=com.instranet.CmdBlobGet&InstranetImage=530914&SecMode=1&DocId=463258&Usage=2. Accessed November 10, 2013.
- Elger, B.S., V. Handtke, and T. Wangmo. Unpublished manuscript. Paternalistic breaches of confidentiality in prison: Mental health professionals’ practice, attitudes, and justifications.Google Scholar
- Elger, B.S., V. Handtke, and T. Wangmo. In press. Informing patients about limits to confidentiality: A qualitative study in prisons. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry.Google Scholar
- The Federal Assembly the Swiss Confederation. (2014) Swiss Criminal Code. http://www.admin.ch/ch/e/rs/311_0/ Accessed April 30, 2014.
- General Medical Council. 2009. Confidentiality. http://www.gmc-uk.org/static/documents/content/Confidentiality_-_English_0414.pdf. Accessed November 10, 2013.
- Melamed, Y., E. Or, D. Rudinski, et al. 2011. Responsibility of the therapist for the patients’ actions (Tarasoff Rules): Position of the psychiatrists. The Israeli Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences 48(2): 107–110.Google Scholar
- Rodriguez, M.A., S.P. Wallace, N.H. Woolf, and C.M. Mangione. 2006. Mandatory reporting of elder abuse: Between a rock and a hard place. Annals of Family Medicine 4(5): 403–409.Google Scholar
- Silverman, D. 1993. Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A.L., and J.M. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- United Nations. 1982. Principles of medical ethics relevant to the role of health personnel, particularly physicians, in the protection of prisoners and detainees against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/37/a37r194.htm. Accessed November 10, 2013.
- World Psychiatric Association. 1996. Madrid declaration on ethical standards for psychiatric practice. http://www.wpanet.org/detail.php?section_id=5&content_id=48. Accessed November 10, 2013.