Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 43–45 | Cite as

Treatment Refusal in Anorexia Nervosa: The Hardest of Cases

Commentary on “Anorexia Nervosa: The Diagnosis: A Postmodern Ethics Contribution to the Bioethics Debate on Involuntary Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa” by Sacha Kendall
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Keywords

Anorexia nervosa Decision-making capacity Substituted decisions Supported decisions Treatment refusal 

References

  1. Allen, N. 2012. A Local Authority v E and others. Thirty-Nine Essex Street, June 15. http://www.39essex.com/court_of_protection/browse.php?id=2987.
  2. Callaghan, S. 2012. The human right to be protected from suicide: Rabone and another (appellants) v Pennine Care [2012] UKSC 2. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9(3): 231–242.Google Scholar
  3. Callaghan, S., and C.J. Ryan. 2012. A submission on the issues raised by the review of the New South Wales Mental Health Act 2007. Part I: Criteria of detention and treatment. https://sydney.academia.edu/SaschaCallaghan/Papers.
  4. Coggon, J. 2013. Anorexia nervosa, best interests, and the patient’s human right to “a wholesale overwhelming of her autonomy”: A Local Authority v. E [2012] EWHC 1639 (COP) * [2012] HRLR 29. Medical Law Review. Epub ahead of print November 5, http://medlaw.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/11/05/medlaw.fwt031.full.
  5. Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2013. Concluding observations on the initial report of Australia, adopted by the Committee at its tenth session. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRPD/Pages/Session10old.aspx.
  6. Hayes, T. 2012. Making decisions: Balancing principles, forcing food: Self-determination and best interests. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9(4): 387–391.Google Scholar
  7. Hope, T., J. Tan, A. Stewart, and J. McMillan. 2013. Agency, ambivalence and authenticity: The many ways in which anorexia nervosa can affect autonomy. International Journal of Law in Context 9(1): 20–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kendall, S. 2014. Anorexia nervosa: The diagnosis: A postmodern ethics contribution to the bioethics debate on involuntary treatment for anorexia nervosa. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11(1). doi:10.1007/s11673-013-9496-x
  9. Richardson, G. 2012. Mental Disabilities and the law: From Substitute to supported decision-making? Current Legal Problems 65(1): 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Szmukler, G., R. Daw, and F. Callard. 2013. Mental health law and the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. Epub ahead of print November 23, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016025271300126X.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Discipline of Psychiatry and the Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in MedicineUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryWestmead HospitalWestmeadAustralia
  3. 3.Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in MedicineUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations