Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

December 2013, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 539–540 | Cite as

Bad Conservation Research Is Unethical Conservation Research

Comment on “Ethics of Species Research and Preservation” by Rob Irvine

• Authors
• Authors and affiliations

• David M. FrankEmail author

Case Studies

First Online: 04 October 2013

Received: 21 August 2013

Accepted: 14 September 2013

• 1 Shares
• 192 Downloads
• 1 Citations

Keywords

Species conservation Research ethics Speartooth shark 

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

1. Irvine, R. 2013. Ethics of species research and preservation. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10(2): 261–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Pillans, R.D., J.D. Stevens, P.M. Kyne, and J. Salini. 2005. Acoustic tracking of Glyphis sp. A in the Adelaide River, Northern Territory, Australia. Canberra: Department of the Environment and Heritage. http://www.environment.gov.au/coasts/publications/pubs/glyphis-nt.pdf.
3. Stevens, J.D., R.D. Pillans, and J. Salini. 2005. Conservation assessment of Glyphis sp. A (speartooth shark), Glyphis sp. C (northern river shark), Pristis microdon (freshwater sawfish) and Pristis zijsron (green sawfish). Hobart: CSIRO Marine Research. http://www.environment.gov.au/coasts/publications/pubs/assessment-glyphis.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

• David M. Frank
  • 1
  Email author

1. 1.Center for Bioethics, Environmental Studies ProgramNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA