Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 225–227

The Strange Case of Dr. B and Mr. Hide: Ethical Sensitivity as a Means to Reflect Upon One’s Actions in Managing Conflict of Interest

Comment on “Toward a Sociology of Conflict of Interest in Medical Research” by Sarah Winch and Michael Sinnott
Case Studies

Keywords

Bioethics Ethical sensitivity Professional ethics Research Conflict of interest 

References

  1. Lo, B., and M.J. Field (eds.). 2009. Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  2. Potvin, M.-J. 2010. Ricoeur’s “petite éthique”: An ethical epistemological perspective for clinician–bioethicists. HEC Forum 22(4): 311–326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Rest, J.R., and D. Narvaez. 1994. Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Stevenson, R.L. 1991. The strange case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, REP edition. New York: Dover Publications. Originally published as Strange case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1886).Google Scholar
  5. Winch, S., and M. Sinnott. 2011. Toward a sociology of conflict of interest in medical research. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8(4): 389–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Programmes de bioéthique, Department of Social and Preventive MedicineUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations