Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 365–372

Dignity Promotion and Beneficence

Article

Abstract

The concept of dignity has occasioned a robust conversation in recent healthcare scholarship. When viewed as a whole, research on dignity in healthcare has engaged each of the four bioethical principles popularized by Beauchamp and Childress, but has paid the least attention to beneficence. In this paper, we look at dignity and beneficence. We focus on the dignity promotion component of a model of dignity derived from a grounded theory study. After describing the study and presenting a précis of the resulting model, we review the principle of beneficence and look at the ways in which the notion of dignity promotion can be used to complement our understanding of this principle. Specifically, we explore what we can learn from dignity promotion about the relational nature of beneficence in healthcare and how dignity promotion can be marshaled to help address the epistemological quandary of soft paternalism.

Keywords

Dignity Beneficence Grounded theory 

References

  1. Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beyleveld, D., and R. Brownsword. 2001. Human dignity in bioethics and biolaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Birrrell, J., D. Thomas, and C.A. Jones. 2006. Promoting privacy and dignity for older patients in hospital. Nursing Standard 20(18): 41–46.Google Scholar
  4. Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic interactionism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Calnan, M., D. Badcott, and G. Woolhead. 2006. Dignity under threat? A study of the experiences of older people in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Health Services 36(2): 355–375.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chochinov, H.M. 2007. Dignity and the essence of medicine: The A, B, C, and D of dignity conserving care. BMJ 335: 184–187.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chochinov, H.M., T. Hack, S. McClement, L. Kristjanson, and M. Harlos. 2002. Dignity in the terminally ill: A developing empirical model. Social Science & Medicine 54: 433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cody, W.K. 2003. Paternalism in nursing and healthcare: Central issues and their relation to theory. Nursing Science Quarterly 16(4): 288–296.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallagher, A., S. Li, P. Wainwright, I. Rees Jones, and D. Lee. 2008. Dignity in the care of older people: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature. BMC Nursing 7: 11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Glaser, B.G., and A.L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  11. Jacelon, C.S. 2003. The dignity of elders in an acute care hospital. Qualitative Health Research 13(4): 543–556.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobson, N. 2007. Dignity and health: A review. Social Science & Medicine 64: 292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacobson, N. 2009a. Dignity violation in health care. Qualitative Health Research 19(11): 1536–1547.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacobson, N. 2009b. A taxonomy of dignity: A grounded theory study. BMC International Health and Human Rights 9(3). Accessible at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/3.
  15. Levenson, R. 2007. The challenge of dignity in care: Upholding the rights of the individual. London: Help the Aged. http://www.helptheaged.org (accessed July 25, 2008).Google Scholar
  16. Lothian, K., and I. Philp. 2001. Maintaining the dignity and autonomy of older people in the healthcare setting. British Medical Journal 322: 668–670.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lundqvist, A., and T. Nilstun. 2007. Human dignity in paediatrics: The effects of health care. Nursing Ethics 14(2): 216–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malpas, J., and N. Lickis (eds.). 2007. Perspectives on human dignity: A conversation. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Matiti, M.R., and G. Trorey. 2004. Perceptual adjustment levels: Patients’ perception of their dignity in the hospital setting. International Journal of Nursing Studies 41: 735–744.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Miller, S. C. 2003. The duty to care: Need and agency in Kantian and feminist ethics. PhD diss., Stony Brook University.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, S.C. 2005. Need, care and obligation. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 80(57): 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nordenfelt, L. 2004. The varieties of dignity. Health Care Analysis 12(2): 69–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. President’s Council on Bioethics. 2008. Human dignity and bioethics: Essays commissioned by the President’s Council on Bioethics. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. Pullman, D. 1999. The ethics of autonomy and dignity in long-term care. Canadian Journal on Aging 18(1): 26–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Schatzman, L. 1991. Dimensional analysis: Notes on an alternative approach to the grounding of theory in qualitative research. In Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss, ed. D.R. Maines, 303–314. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  26. Soderberg, A., F. Gilje, and A. Norberg. 1997. Dignity in situations of ethical difficulty in intensive care. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 13: 135–144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Stabell, A., and D. Naden. 2006. Patients’ dignity in a rehabilitation ward: Ethical challenges for nursing staff. Nursing Ethics 13(3): 236–248.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Strauss, A.L. 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health Systems Research and Consulting UnitCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Joint Centre for BioethicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations