Neonatal Euthanasia: Why Require Parental Consent?
- 663 Downloads
The Dutch rules governing neonatal euthanasia, known as the Groningen Protocol, require parental consent for severely disabled infants with poor prognoses to have their lives terminated. This paper questions whether parental consent should be dispositive in such cases, and argues that the potential suffering of the neonate or pediatric patient should be the decisive factor under such unfortunate circumstances.
KeywordsEuthanasia Pediatric euthanasia Groningen protocol
- American Academy of Pediatrics’ Committee on Bioethics. 1995. Informed consent, parental permission and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 95(2): 314–317.Google Scholar
- Cohan, J.A. 2006. Judicial enforcement of lifesaving treatment for unwilling patients. Creighton Law Review 39: 849–913.Google Scholar
- Davis, D.S. 1994. Does "no" mean "yes"? The continuing problem of Jehovah's Witnesses and refusal of blood products. Second Opinion 19(3): 34–43.Google Scholar
- Dickens, B., et al. 1998. Dealing with demands for inappropriate treatment. Canadian Medical Association Journal 6: 817–821.Google Scholar
- Frith, M. 2004. Doctors can withhold sick boy’s life saving treatment. The Independent 23 October.Google Scholar
- McAlpine, J. 2007. “Euthanasia” doctor merits mercy. Sunday Times 8 July, 15.Google Scholar
- Merrick, J. 2003. Spiritual healing, sick kids, and the law: Inequities in the American healthcare system. American Journal of Law. Medical Ethics (Burlington, Mass.) 29(2/3): 269–299.Google Scholar
- Moore, P. 2007. An end of life quandary in need of a statutory response: When patients demand life sustaining treatment that physicians are unwilling to provide. Boston College Law Review. Boston College. Law School 48: 433–469.Google Scholar
- Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 1944. 321 US 158.Google Scholar
- Roser, M.A. 2007. Boy’s short life to have lasting impact. Austin American Statesman 21 May, B1.Google Scholar
- Tatman v. Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center, Court of Appeals of Tennessee. 2001.Google Scholar
- Urquhart, F. 2007. Consultant calls for debate to clear up end-of-life decisions. The Scotsman 12 July, 7.Google Scholar