Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 69–81 | Cite as

The Other Abortion Myth—the Failure of the Common Law

Article

Abstract

The 2006 trial of Suman Sood put criminal abortion on the public agenda for the first time in 25 years in NSW. Response to the case highlights tenacious myths about abortion law in Australia; namely that the common law “is an ass” that allows for abortion only by way of a lack of application of the law. By briefly explaining the history of abortion in Australia, I argue that the Sood case does not represent a general failure of the common law to allow abortion, nor does it support the popular myth that abortion is “technically” illegal, or that doctors who perform abortions have historically been the target of the criminal law in Australia. I show that contrary to myths promoted particularly around the 1998 Western Australian reforms, abortion has long been lawful in Australia, and the common law has merit compared to other regulatory regimes. Hence, arguments for alternative abortion regimes should not depend on myths which are shown to be unrepresentative of the political and legal situation in Australia.

Keywords

Abortion Law Sood Common law 

References

  1. ABC. 2006. The Sood Abortion Trial. Law Report. August 29. http://www.abc.net.au/rn/lawreport/stories/2006/1724391.htm. Viewed 8 August 2008.
  2. ABC. 2007. Vic MPs to be Given Conscience Vote on Abortion. Lateline. July 17 http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2007/s1981184.htm Viewed 8 August 2008.
  3. Albury, R. 1999. The politics of reproduction: Beyond the slogans. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  4. ALRA. (WA) Association for the legal right to abortion (Western Australia) website http://users.bigpond.net.au/alra/ Viewed 8 August 2008
  5. ALRA (WA). 1974. Report on Legal, Medical, Social and Political Aspects of Abortion Relevant to Western Australia. January. unpublished.Google Scholar
  6. Baird, B. 1998. The self aborting woman. Australian Feminist Studies, 13(28): 323–337.Google Scholar
  7. Barker and Larkin. 1968. Insight Article. Age, February 14.Google Scholar
  8. Brankovich, J. 2001. Constructing a feminist morality in the Western Australian abortion debate 1998. Journal of Australian Studies, 67:86–94, 220–221.Google Scholar
  9. Broad, C. 2007. Crimes (Decriminalisation of Abortion) Bill: Second Reading. Legislative Council 19 July: 2144.Google Scholar
  10. Cannold, L. 2005. The abortion case that could set an ugly precedent for women. Age, August 11.Google Scholar
  11. Cannold, L. 1998. The abortion myth: Feminism, morality and the hard choices women make. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  12. Cannold, L., and Calcutt, C. 2001. The Australian pro-choice movement and the Struggle for Legal Clarity, Liberal Laws and Liberal Access: Two Case Studies. In Advocating for Abortion Access: 11 Country Studies, ed. B. Klugman and D. Budlender: 41-70. Johannesburg: The Women’s Health Project.Google Scholar
  13. Chappell, D. 1968. Abortion and the law in Australia. Australian Humanist, 6: 10–15.Google Scholar
  14. Cica, N. 1991. The inadequacies of Australian abortion law. Australian Journal of Family Law 5: 37–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cica, N. 1998a. Ordering the law on abortion in Australia's wild west. Alternative Law Journal, 23(2): 89.Google Scholar
  16. Cica, N. 1998b. Abortion law in Australia. Parliamentary Library of Australia 31 August, http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/RP/1998-99/99rp01.htm Viewed 6 March 2007.
  17. Coleman, K. 1991. Discourses on sexuality: The modern abortion debates. Phd Diss., Macquarie University.Google Scholar
  18. Davenport, C. 1998. Achieving law reform in Western Australia. Australian Feminist Studies 13(28): 299–305.Google Scholar
  19. de Crespigny Lachlan, J., & Savulescu, J. (2004). Abortion: Time to clarify Australia’s confusing laws. The Medical Journal of Australia, 181, 201–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Illawarra Mercury. 1998. Perth doctor defends abortion as legal. February 6.Google Scholar
  21. Jacobsen, Geesche. 2006a. Baby had little chance. Sydney Morning Herald, July 18: 4.Google Scholar
  22. Jacobsen, Geesche. 2006b. Revealed: the dark past of a guilty abortion doctor. Sydney Morning Herald August 24.Google Scholar
  23. Kirkby, M. 1998. Western Australia’s new abortion laws: Restrictive and reinforcing the power of the medical profession and the state over women’s bodies and lives. Australian Feminist Studies 13(28): 305–312.Google Scholar
  24. Kirkby, M. 2004. The politics of abortion. Paper presented at the Sydney Social Forum, September 19, in Sydney.Google Scholar
  25. Le Grand, Chip. 1998. Hospital ultimatum on abortion. The Australian April 30.Google Scholar
  26. Mark, Russell. 1998. Landmark abortion charges thrown out. Courier-Mail, July 31.Google Scholar
  27. McGregor, Adrian and Matt Price. 1998. Interstate show of solidarity for doctors. The Australian, February 19.Google Scholar
  28. O’Brien, Natalie. 1998. Call for national debate on abortion. The Australian, February 24.Google Scholar
  29. Petersen, G. 1998. George Petersen remembers: The contradictions, problems, and betrayals of Labor in government in New South Wales. Petersen: Sydney.Google Scholar
  30. Petersen, K. 2000. Abortion: Medicalisation and legal gatekeeping. Journal of Law and Medicine 7: 267–272.Google Scholar
  31. Powell, Sian. 1998a. Eastern caution on West’s abortion win. The Australian, April 4.Google Scholar
  32. Powell, Sian. 1998b. Pro-choice: Within the guidelines. The Australian, July 30.Google Scholar
  33. Pollard, Ruth. 2006. Medical menace ran theatre of blood. Sydney Morning Herald, October 7.Google Scholar
  34. Pringle, H. 1996. Abortion in and out of the courts. Current Affairs Bulletin, (April-May), 31.Google Scholar
  35. Pringle, H. 1997. Is abortion illegal? Australian Journal of Political Science 32(1): 93–110. doi:10.1080/10361149751020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pringle, H. 2007. Urban mythology: The question of abortion in parliament. Australasian Parliamentary Review 22(2): 5–22.Google Scholar
  37. Rankin, M. 2001. Contemporary Australian abortion law: The description of a crime and the negation of a woman’s right to abortion. Monash University Law Review. Monash University. Faculty of Law 27(2): 231–252.Google Scholar
  38. Rankin, M. 2003. Recent developments in Australian abortion law: Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory. Monash University Law Review. Monash University. Faculty of Law 29(2): 316–335.Google Scholar
  39. Riseman, N. 2005. Medical choice: The Australian movement to legalize abortion, 1967-80. Lilith (Fitzroy, Vic.) 14: 92–104.Google Scholar
  40. Summers, Anne. 2005. Future of abortion hangs on landmark hearing. Sydney Morning Herald, August 11.Google Scholar
  41. Stephen, K. 1998. Changes to Western Australia's abortion law in 1998. Pro-Choice Forum, http://www.prochoiceforum.org.uk/al5.asp. Viewed 6 March 2007
  42. Sydney Morning Herald. 1977. Appeal court upholds doctor’s suspension on abortion issue. March 19: 5.Google Scholar
  43. Sydney Morning Herald. 1980. ‘Quite barbaric’ says SM. For trial on alleged abortion bid. May 10: 3.Google Scholar
  44. Teasdale, L. 1999. Confronting the fear of being ‘caught’: Discourses on abortion in Western Australia. The University of New South Wales Law Journal, 22(1), 60–99.Google Scholar
  45. Wainer, B. 1972. It isn’t nice. Alpha Books: Sydney.Google Scholar
  46. Wiseman, Heather. 2006. The fear factor. Australian Doctor, November 3: 23.Google Scholar
  47. Wolf, Naomi. 1995. Our bodies, our souls: Rethinking pro-choice rhetoric. The New Republic 213:26, October 16.Google Scholar

Cases cited

  1. CES v Superclinics (Australia) Pty Ltd 1995 38 NSWLR 47Google Scholar
  2. King v Bourne 1939 1 KB 687Google Scholar
  3. R v Bayliss and Cullen 1986 9 Qld Lawyer RepsGoogle Scholar
  4. R v Davidson 1969 VR 667Google Scholar
  5. R v Sood (Ruling No 3) 2006 NSWSC 762 (15 September 2006)Google Scholar
  6. R v Sood 2006 NSWSC 1141 (31 October 2006)Google Scholar
  7. R v Wald 1972 3 DCR (NSW) 25Google Scholar
  8. Royal Women's Hospital v Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria 2006 VSCA 85 (20 April 2006)Google Scholar
  9. Superclinics Australia Pty Ltd v CES & Ors S88/1996 (11 September1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of LawMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations