Metallurgical failure analysis of various implant materials used in orthopedic applications

  • B. Aksakal
  • Ö. S. Yildirim
  • H. Gul
Features Orthopedics

Conclusion

Through metallurgical SEM analysis, it was found that 42% of failures occurred due to corrosion plus erosion-corrosion, 16.5% were due to inclusions and stress gaps that could be correlated oto fatigue, 16.5% had traces of production impurities, and 25% showed fatigue via ductile-type failures. The results/reasons correlation can be summarized as follows:
  • • In the investigation of a total hip prosthesis, the fracture was multiorigined, probably due to the presence of manufacturing defects in both surfaces of the device; was associated with poor design of the component; and introduced points of high stress concentration.

  • • The study revealed that the failure of the stainless steel femoral compression plates occurred by a fretting-fatigue mechanism under the action of low nominal stresses and unidirectional bending.

  • • The failure of femoral compression titanium plates occurred by corrosion fatigue promoted by the presence of intense localized corrosion and intergranular cracking.

  • • The failure of hollow spinal rods occurred by overload caused by the intense formation of pitting corrosion during service. The pitting was associated with the presence of superficial manufacturing routes.

As a result of the analysis of various implant materials, the main reasons for failure are corrosive attack, manufacturing defects, and nonstandard-caused failures. Biocompatible inorganic materials, such as hydroxy-apatite coating with some binders, would make the dissolution of metal ions difficult and so may delay corrosion and wear and also minimize the loosening of implants from bone.

Keywords

Fatigue Failure Analysis Scanning Electron Micro Intergranular Crack Hydroxyapatite Coating 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G.K. Smith and J. Black: “Models for Systemic Effects of Metallic Implants,” Proc. Int. Symp. on Retrieval and Analysis of Orthopaedic Implants, NBS special publ. 472, National Bureau of Standards, MD, 1976, pp. 23–30.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C.R.F. Azevedo and E. Hippert, Jr.: “Failure Analysis of Surgical Implants in Brazil,” J. Eng. Failure Analys., 2002, 9, pp. 621–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.R.F. Azevedo: “Failure Analysis of a Commercially Pure Titanium Plate for Osteosynthesis,” J. Eng. Failure Analys., 2003, 10, in press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Pitrowski: “Clinical Biomedics,” Proc. Int. Symp. on Retrieval and Analysis of Orthopaedic Implants, NBS special publ. 472, National Bureau of Standards, MD, 1976, pp. 41–49.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.F. Williams: “A Review of Metallurgical Failure Modes in Orthopaedic Implants,” Proc. Int. Symp. on Retrieval and Analysis of Orthopaedic Implants, NBS special publ. 472, National Bureau of Standards, MD, 1976, pp. 11–21.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Ducheyne, J. Beight, J. Cuckler, B. Evans, and S. Radin: “Effect of Calcium Phosphate Coating Characteristics on Early Post-Operative Bone Tissue Ingrowth,” Biomaterials, 1990, 11, pp. 531–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Ban and S. Maruno: “Effect of Temperature on Electrochemical Deposition of Calcium Phosphate Coatings in a Simulated Body Fluid,” Biomaterials, 1995, 16, pp. 977–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.A. Jansen, J.G. Wolke, S. Swann, J.P. Van der Waerden, and K. deGroot: “Application of Magnetron Sputtering for Producing Ceramic Coatings on Implant Materials,” Clin. Oral Implants Res., 1993, 4, pp. 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C.S. Kim and P. Ducheyne: “Compositional Variations in the Surface and Interface of Calcium Phosphate Ceramic Coatings on Ti and Ti-6Al-4V due to Sintering and Immersion,” Biomaterials, 1991, 12, pp. 461–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Cheang and K.A. Khor: “Addressing Processing Problems Associated with Plasma Spraying of Hydroxyapatite Coatings,” Biomaterials, 1996, 17, pp. 537–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.P.A.T. Klein, J.G.C. Wolke, J.M.A. de Blieck-Hogervorst, and K. deGroot: “Features of Calcium Phosphate Plasma-Sprayed Coatings: An In Vitro Study,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1994, 28, pp. 961–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Ishikawa, M. Kon, S. Tenshin, and N. Kuwayama: “Effect of Preparation Conditions in Aqueous Solution on Properties of Hydroxyapatite,” Dent. Mater., 1990, 9, pp. 58–69.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Ducheyne, W. Van Raemdonck, J.C. Heughebaert, and M. Heughebaert: “Structural Analysis of Hydroxyapatite Coatings on Titanium,” Biomaterials, 1986, 7, pp. 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.L. Gilbert, C.A. Buckley, et al.: “Intergranular Corrosion-Fatigue Failure of Cobalt-Alloy Femoral Stems,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 1994, 76(1), pp.110–15.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Chaodi, G. Christopher, et al.: “Progressive Failure Analysis of Laminated Composite Femoral Prostheses for Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Biomaterials, 2002, 23, pp. 4249–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    W.L. Jaffe and D.F. Scott: “Total Hip Arthroplasty with Hydroxyapatite-Coated Prosthesis,” J. Bone Joint Surg., 1996, 78A(12), pp. 1919–34.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A.K. Lynn and D.L. DuQuesnay: “Hydroxyapatite-Coated Ti-6Al-4V, Part 1: The Effect of Coating Thickness on Mechanical Fatigue Behaviour,” Biomaterials, 2002, 23, pp. 1937–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D.W. Howie, S.D. Rogers, et al.: “Biological Effect of Cobalt Chrome in Cell and Animal Models,” Clin. Orthop., 1996, pp. 217–32.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M.A. Akoy, M. Baydoğan, et al.: “Failure Analysis on a Femur Prosthesis,” The Fifth Int. Fracture Symp. (Elaziğ, Turkey), Sept. 2001.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Christian, S. Stefanie, et al.: “Implant Failure of the Gamma Nail,” Injury, Int. J. Care Injured, 1999, 30, pp. 91–99.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M.M. Edwin, V.A. Edward, J.S. Peter, and J.S. Neal: “Exchange Nailing for Failure of Initially Rodded Tibial Shaft Fractures,” J. Orthop., 2001, 24(8), pp. 757–62.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H.G. Willer, L.G. Broback, and G.H. Buchorn: “Crevice Corrosion of Cemented Titanium Hip Implants,” Clin. Orthop., 1996, 333, pp. 51–57.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    B.F. Shagaldi and J. Compson: “Wear and Corrosion of Sliding Counterparts of Stainless-Steel Hip Screw-Plates,” Injury, Int. J. Care Injured, 2000, 31, pp. 85–92.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    M.A. Khan, R.L. Williams, and D.F. Williams: “Conjoint Corrosion and Wear of Titanium Alloys,” Biomaterials, 1999, 20, pp. 765–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    L. Reclaru et al.: “Corrosion Behaviour of a Welded Stainless-Steel Orthopedic Implant,” Biomaterials, 2001, 22, pp. 269–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. Walczak, F. Shahgaldi, and F. Heatley: “In Vivo Corrosion of 316L Stainless-Steel Implants,” Biomaterials, 1998, 19, pp. 229–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Toshikazu and N. Mitsuo: “Fracture Characteristics of Fatigued Ti6Al4V ELI as an Implant Material,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1998, 243, pp. 237–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    M.A. McGee et al.: “Implant Retrieval Studies of the Wear and Loosening of Prosthetic Joints: A Review,” Wear, 2000, 241, pp. 158–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    G. Berger, U. Ploska, and G. Willmann: “Hydroxyapatite’s Solubility May Cause Loosening of Coated Implants,” Proc. 13th Int. Symp. on Ceramics in Medicine (Bologna, Italy), 2001, pp. 192–95.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    O.E.M. Pohler: “Failure of Metallic Orthopaedic Implants,” Materials Characterization, Vol 10, Metals Handbook, 9th ed., American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1986, pp. 668–94.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    J.H. Dumplenton and E.H. Miller: “Failure of Metallic Orthopaedic Implants,” in Metals Handbook, 8th ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1993, pp. 571–80.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    K.R. Wheller and L.A. James: “Fatigue Behaviour of Type 316 Stainless Steel under Simulated Body Conditions,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1971, pp. 267–81.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    S. Suresh: Fatigue of Materials, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    S.S. Manson: ASTM STP 495, Avoidance, Control, and Repair of Fatigue Damage, ASTM, Philadelphia, 1971, pp. 254–346.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    R.O. Ritchie, R.H. Dauskardt, and B.N. Cox: “Fatigue of Advanced Materials: Summary and Future Trends,” Proc. of the Eng. Foundation Int. Conf. (Santa Barbara, CA), 1991, pp. 485–93.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    G. Haicheng, G. Huifang, C. Shufen, and C. Laird: “Orientation Dependence of Cyclic Deformation in High Purity Titanium Single Crystals,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1994, 118, pp. 23–36.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    I. Aitchison and B. Cox: “Interpretation of Fractographs of SSC in Hexagonal Metals,” Corrosion, 1972, 28(3), pp. 83–87.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    J.C. Chesnutt and J.C. Williams: “Comments on the Electron Fractography of Alpha Titanium,” Metall. Trans. A, 1977, 8(3), pp. 514–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Aksakal
    • 1
  • Ö. S. Yildirim
    • 2
  • H. Gul
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringAtatürk University, Engineering FacultyErzurumTurkey
  2. 2.Department of OrthopedicsAtatürk University, Faculty of MedicineErzurumTurkey
  3. 3.Vocational School of Technical SciencesUniversity of FiratElazigTurkey

Personalised recommendations