Failure Investigation of Products and Components in Metal Forming Industry: Root Cause Analysis and Process-Based Approach

  • Sofia Papadopoulou
  • Athanasios Vazdirvanidis
  • Anagnostis Toulfatzis
  • Andreas Rikos
  • George PantazopoulosEmail author
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed


Fatigue fracture, occurring in selected industrial manufactured products and components during production, testing or service conditions, is a typical failure mode. Primarily, the main qualitative and phenomenological aspects and features of failure modes are presented for industrial components (track-type chain blocks and steel rebars), based on case history approach, and correlated with the prevailed operating loading conditions. These characteristics are mainly recorded for the identification of the emergent failure mechanism(s). The second part of the paper includes the presentation of selected methodological techniques which are briefly summarized and discussed. The aim is to provide a wider perspective of failure prevention, using the process and systems approach principles, which broaden the scope of the organization capability to address and minimize the risks and capitalize the opportunities, assisting to quality and business improvement.


Fractography Fatigue Industrial components Steel rebars 



The authors wish to express their gratitude to ELKEME Management for the encouragement and continuous support.


  1. 1.
    G.D. Quinn, Fractography of Ceramics and Glasses, 2nd edn. (U.S. Government, NIST, Gaithersburg, 2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F.K. Geitner, H.P. Bloch, Machinery Failure, Analysis and Troubleshooting, Practical Machinery Management for Process Plants (Butterworth-Heinmann, Oxford, 2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.A. Ryder, T.J. Davies, I. Brough, F.R. Hutchings, General practice in failure analysis, in Failure Analysis and Prevention, ASM Handbook, (ASM International, 1986), pp. 15–46Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Lynch, S. Moutsos, A brief history of fractography. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 6, 54–69 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Psyllaki, K. Papadimitriou, G. Pantazopoulos, Failure modes of liquid nitrocarburized and heat treated tool steel under monotonic loading conditions. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 6(6), 13–18 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B.O. Alli, Fundamental Principles of Occupational Health and Safety (International Labour Office, Geneva, 2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.D. Antolovich, A. Saxena, Fatigue failures, in Failure Analysis and Prevention, ASM Handbook (ASM International, 1986), pp. 102–135Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Pantazopoulos, A. Vazdirvanidis, A. Toulfatzis, A. Rikos, Fatigue failure of steel links operating as chain. Eng. Fail. Anal. 16, 2440–2449 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Pantazopoulos, S. Zormalia, Analysis of failure mechanism of gripping tool steel component operated in an industrial draw bench. Eng. Fail. Anal. 18, 1595–1604 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G.W. Powell, Identification of failures, in Failure Analysis and Prevention, ASM Handbook (ASM International, 1986), pp. 75–81Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Berto, A. Majid, L. Marsavina, Mixed mode fracture. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 91, 1 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. Perez, Mixed Mode Fracture Mechanics, Fracture Mechanics (Springer, Cham, 2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Pantazopoulos, A. Vazdirvanidis, A. Toulfatzis, S. Papadopoulou, A. Rikos, Failure analysis of industrial products and components: from identification to process-based approach, in Materials Science and Technology 2019—Industry Related Failures, Portland Oregon, 29 September–3 October 2019, Conference Proceedings, pp. 904–911Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Pantazopoulos, Damage assessment using fractography as failure evaluation: applications in industrial metalworking machinery. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 11(6), 588–594 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Pantazopoulos, A. Toulfatzis, A. Vazdirvanidis, Analysis of the degradation process of structural steel component subjected. Metallogr. icrostruct. Anal. 5(2), 149–156 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    ASM, Atlas of Microstructures of Industrial Alloys, vol. 7, 8th ed, Metals Handbook (1973)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    U. Zerbst, C. Klinger, R. Clegg, Fracture mechanics as a tool in failure analysis—prospects and limitations. Eng. Fail. Anal. 55, 376–410 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Majumdar, R. Ali, A. Kumar, A. Deb, Optimum rib design in TMT rebars to enhance fatigue life while retaining bond strength. Mater. Civ. Eng. 30(3), 04017313 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Maciejewski, The effects of sulfide inclusions on mechanical properties and failures of steel components. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 15(2), 169–178 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Nishida, Failure Analysis in Engineering Applications (Butterwoth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1992)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    G.A. Pantazopoulos, A short review on fracture mechanisms of mechanical components operated under industrial process conditions: fractographic analysis and selected prevention strategies. Metals 9, 148 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Toulfatzis, G. Pantazopoulos, C. David, D. Sagris, A. Paipetis, Machinability of eco-friendly lead free brass alloys: cutting-force and surface-roughness optimization. Metals 8, 250 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Mariajayaprakash, T. Senthilvelan, Optimizing process parameters of screw conveyor (sugar mill boiler) through failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) and Taguchi method. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 14(6), 772–783 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Espejo, C.J. Moreno, A performance evaluation of three inference engines as expert systems for failure mode identification in shafts. Eng. Fail. Anal. 53, 24–35 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    D.P. Dennies, How to Organize and Run a Failure Investigation (ASM International, Almere, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    G.A. Pantazopoulos, A process-based approach in failure analysis. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 14(4), 551–553 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Quality Management Systems—Requirements, ISO 9001:2015, Brussels, Belgium: CEN—European Committee for Standardization (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ELKEME Hellenic Research Centre for Metals S.A.Oinofyta ViotiasGreece

Personalised recommendations