Advertisement

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 445–452 | Cite as

Reliability Analysis of Type III Gas Storage Vessel Under Pressure Loading

  • A. Ghouaoula
  • A. Hocine
  • M. Hadj MelianiEmail author
  • A. Maizia
  • Rami Suleiman
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

This work presents the suggestion of a model for the prediction of the reliability of type III gas storage vessel under pressure, considering the geometrical and mechanical uncertainties using the Monte Carlo method. Using the hoop stress for each ply, the Monte Carlo method was used to predict the distribution function of the mechanical response. The random design variables of the aluminum liner; which is overwrapped by a composite manufactured by filament winding. Nine random design variables with uncertainties were selected, namely: elastic constants of metallic and composite materials, ply angles, thickness, and finally the mechanical loading (pressure). To ensure the accuracy of the obtained results, we have performed 105 simulations. The obtained results showed that the elastic properties of the composite materials have no significant influence on the security of the composite vessels type III in relation to the manufacturing parameters: which are thickness, winding angle, and the loading pressure. The probability of failure increased significantly when all the random variables were considered simultaneously.

Keywords

Composite Metallic liner Type III vessel Analytical design Reliability Uncertainty 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    A. Hocine, D. Chapelle, L. Boubakar, A. Benamar, A. Bezazi, Analysis of intermetallic swelling on the behavior of a hybrid solution for compressed hydrogen storage: Part I—Analytical modeling. Int. J. Mater. Design 31, 2435–2443 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Hocine, A. Maizia, M. Chérifi, D. Chapelle, A contribution of the reliability based approach for cylindrical composite of sensitivity analytical design. Adv. Mater. Process. Technol. 3, 1–10 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.J. Sobey, J.I.R. Blake, R.A. Shenoi, Monte Carlo reliability analysis of tophat stiffened composite plate structures under out of plane loading. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 110, 41 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L.F. Sánchez-Heres, J.W. Ringsberg, E. Johnson, Influence of mechanical and probabilistic models on the reliability estimates of fiber-reinforced cross-ply laminates. Struct. Saf. 51, 35–46 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.M. Frangopol, S. Recek, Reliability of fiber-reinforced composite laminate plates. Probab. Eng. Mech. 18, 119–137 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.H. Lopez, L.F.F. Miguel, I.M. Belo, J.E. Souza Cursi, Advantages of employing a full characterization method over FORM in the reliability analysis of laminated composite plates. Compos. Struct. 107, 635–642 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.P. Teixeira, C. GuedesSoares, T.A. Netto, S.F. Estefen, Reliability of pipelines with corrosion defects. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 85, 228–237 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C.C. António, L.N. Hoffbauer, An approach for reliability-based robust design optimization of angle-ply composites. Compos. Struct. 90, 53–59 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Meriem-Benziane, S.A. Abdul-Wahab, H. Zahloul, B. Babaziane, M. Hadj-Meliani, G. Pluvinage, Finite element analysis of the integrity of an API X65 pipeline with a longitudinal crack repaired with single-and double-bonded composites. Compos. Part B: Eng. 77, 431–439 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Hadj Meliani, Z. Azari, M. Al-Qadhi, N. Merah, G. Pluvinage, A two-parameter approach to assessing notch fracture behaviour in clay/epoxy nanocomposites. Compos. Part B: Eng. 80, 126–133 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O. Bouledroua, M. Hadj Meliani, G. Pluvinage, Assessment of pipe defects using a constraint-modified failure assessment diagram. J. Failure Anal. Prev. 17(1), 144–153 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Pluvinage, O. Bouledrou, M. Hadj Meliani, R. Suleiman, Corrosion defect analysis using domain failure assessment diagram. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 165, 126–134 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O. Bouledroua, M. Hadj Meliani, Z. Azari, A. Sorour, N. Merah, G. Pluvinage, Effect of sandblasting on tensile properties, hardness and fracture resistance of a line pipe steel used in algeria for oil transport. J. Failure Anal. Prev. 17(5), 890–904 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Ghouaoula
    • 1
  • A. Hocine
    • 1
  • M. Hadj Meliani
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • A. Maizia
    • 1
  • Rami Suleiman
    • 4
  1. 1.Controls Laboratory Tests, Measurements and Simulations MechanicsPO. Box 151, Hay Salem, Hassiba Benbouali University of ChlefChlefAlgeria
  2. 2.LPTPMHassiba Benbouali University of ChlefChlefAlgeria
  3. 3.LEM3University of LorraineMetzFrance
  4. 4.Center of Research Excellence in Corrosion (CoRE-C)King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM)DhahranSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations