Advertisement

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 1601–1606 | Cite as

Comparison of Double- and Single-Bonded Repairs to Symmetrical Composite Structures

  • A. Benkheira
  • M. BelhouariEmail author
  • S. Benbarek
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

The object of this study is an experimental analysis of the repair of a laminate composite damaged by central circular notch. The effects of the repair technique used, single or double patch, the nature of the patch and its stacking sequence, were highlighted. The main results show that the performance of the repair depends on several parameters, namely the nature of the patch and its stacking sequence, the technique repair used.

Keywords

Laminate composite Stacking sequence Composite patch Stiffness 

References

  1. 1.
    K.H. Chung, W.H. Yang, Study of the fatigue crack growth behaviour of thick aluminium panels repaired with a composite patch. Compos. Struct. 60, 1–7 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    T.H. Hosseini, G. Sadeghi, H.R. Daghyani, Experimental fatigue crack growth and crack-front shape analysis of assymetric repaired aluminium panels with glass-époxy composite patches. Compos. Struct. 71, 401–406 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.D. Mathias, X. Balandraud, M. Grediac, Applying a genetic algorithm to the optimization of composite patches. Comput. Struct. 84, 823–834 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S.M. Fekih, A. Albedah, F. Benyahia, M. Belhouari, B. Bachir Bouiadjra, A. Miloudi, Optimisation of the sizes of bonded composite repair in aircraft structures. Mater. Des. 41, 171–176 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.D. Mathias, M. Grédiac, X. Balandraud, On the bidirectional stess distribution in rectangular bonded composite patches. Int. J Solids Struct. 43, 6921–6947 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    X. Liu, Wang progressive failure analysis of bonded composite repairs. Compos. Struct. 81, 331–340 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.N. Duong, C.H. Wang, Composite repair/Theory and Design, 1st edn. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007). ISBN 978-0-0804-5146-6Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O. Harald, D. McGeorge, J.R. Weitzenbôck, G.O. Guthu, Predicting failure of bonded patches using a fracture mechanics approach. Int. J. Adhesion Adhes. 37, 102–111 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Cheng, X.J. Gong, S. Aivazzadeh, X. Xiao, Experimental observation of tensile behavior of patch repaired composites. Polym. Test. 34, 146–154 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    X.J. Gong, P. Cheng, S. Aivazzadeh, X. Xiao, Design and optimization of bonded patch repairs of laminated composite structures. Compos. Struct. 123, 292–300 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Madani, S. Touzain, X. Feaugas, S. Cohendouz, M. Ratwani, Experimental and numerical study of repair techniques for panels with geometrical discontinuities. Comput. Mater. Sci. 48, 83–93 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Davis, D. Bond, Principles and practices of adhesive bonded structural joints and repairs. Int. J. of Adhesion Adhes. 19, 91–105 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Jefferson Andrew, V. Arumugam, C. Ramesh, S. Poorani, C. Santulli, Quasi-static indentation properties of damaged glass/epoxy composite laminates repaired by the application of intra-ply hybrid patches. Polym. Test. 61, 132–145 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K.B. Katnam, L.F.M. DaSilva, T.M. Young, Bonded repair of composite aircraft structures: A review of scientific challenges and opportunities. Prog. in Aerosp. Sci. 61, 26–42 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    V.S. Balakrishnan, H. Seidlitz, Potential repair techniques for automotive composites: A review. Compos. Part B. 145, 28–38 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Baker, Development of a Hard-Patch Approach for Scarf Repair of Composite Structure: DSTO TR-1892, Defence Science and Technology Organisation (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Tzetzis, P.J. Hogg, M. Jogia, The compression performance and the associated global buckling behavior of a vacuum-infused repaired composite component monitored by the shadow moiré technique. Exp Tech. 32, 39–46 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P.M. Wales, K.B. Katnam, H.F. Marren, T.M. Young, Composite repairs using vacuum infusion and bondline veils, in Royal Aeronautical Society Aircraft Structural Design Conference, vol. 4 (2014).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    F. Ellert, I. Bradshaw, R. Steinhilper, Major factors influencing tensile strength of repaired CFRP samples. Proc. CIRP. 33, 275–280 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    K.B. Katnam, J.X. Dhote, T.M. Young, Experimental analysis of the bond line stress concentrations to characterize the influence of adhesive ductility on the composite single lap joint strength. J. Adhesion 89, 406–486 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Sidi Bel Abbes, Sidi Bel AbbesSidi Bel AbbèsAlgeria

Personalised recommendations