Advertisement

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 1587–1600 | Cite as

Prioritizing the Causes of Fire and Explosion in the External Floating Roof Tanks

  • Parisa Moshashaei
  • Seyed Shamseddin Alizadeh
  • Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi
  • Leila Khazini
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • 77 Downloads

Abstract

In the oil industry, many flammable products such as liquid hydrocarbons are usually stored in the atmospheric storage tanks. One type of these suitable tanks is the floating roof tanks. Among the floating roof tanks, external floating roof tanks are mainly used to store large quantities of petroleum products such as crude oil or condensate, gasoline, kerosene. The purpose of this study is prioritizing the causes of fire and explosion in the external floating roof tanks. In this study, firstly, the causes of fire and explosion of the external floating roof tanks were identified and then the obtained variables were scored by the process and safety specialists. In the next step, the causes were weighed and prioritized using the analytic network process method and Super Decisions software. The findings of the study identified 11 main criteria and 71 sub-criteria for fire and explosion of external floating roof tanks. Results revealed that several effective risk factors in the fire and explosion are natural disasters, static electricity, operational error, faulty firefighting system, maintenance error, piping rupture/leak, equipment/instrument failure, open flames, tank crack/rupture, runaway reactions, and sabotage, respectively. This study will help experts to identify the effective risk factors in fire and explosion in external floating roof tanks and their importance. Therefore, they can prioritize and implement the control measures to prevent fire and explosion incidents in external floating roof tanks.

Keywords

Fire Explosion External floating roof tanks ANP 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to Health Faculty of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences for funding this work under the master’s thesis (Project Reference: 5/D/35901). The authors are also grateful to experts of safety and process of refineries in Tabriz, Tehran, and to those who helped us collect the data.

References

  1. 1.
    F. Centenoa, E.E.C. Rodrigues, Reduced-scale study of liquid fuel storage tank fire using fire dynamics simulator. Therm. Eng. 14(1), 40–46 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    X. Fu et al., Application of compressed air foam system in extinguishing oil tank fire and middle layer effect. Procedia Eng. 45, 669–673 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K.R. Marianayagam, Numerical Simulation Study on Parameters related to Athabasca Bitumen Recovery with SAGD. Earth Sciences and Petroleum Engineering (Institutt for petroleumsteknologi og anvendt geofysikk, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 2012), p. 57Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Zhaoa, J.S. Liu, The feasibility study of extinguishing oil tank fire by using compressed air foam system. Procedia Eng. 135(1), 61–66 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Akyuz, Quantification of human error probability towards the gas inerting process on-board crude oil tankers. Saf. Sci. 80, 77–86 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Z. Nivolianitou, et al., A methodology for the hazard assessment in large hydrocarbon fuel tanks. Chem. Eng. Trans. 26, 171–176 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Wen-hea, X. Zhi-shenga, S. Bao-jiang, Numerical simulation of fire thermal radiation field for large crude oil tank exposed to pool fire. Procedia Eng. 52, 395–400 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Lin, P. Yi, Y. Shuangchun, The cause of fire and preventive measures in oil depot. Int. J. Eng. Res. Dev. 4(11), 55–57 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Zhang, H. Jiang, C. Zhang, Study of charging nitrogen to external floating roof tank to prevent rim-seal fires from lightning. Procedia Eng. 71, 124–129 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Guan et al., Experiment study of oil tank fire characteristics dependent on the opening of tank top. Procedia Eng. 62, 932–939 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.D. Argyropoulos et al., Modelling pollutants dispersion and plume rise from large hydrocarbon tank fires in neutrally stratified atmosphere. Atmos. Environ. 44, 803–813 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C.H. Shelley, storage tank fires: is your department prepared? Fire Eng. 161(11), 63 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Ennis, Pressure relief considerations for low-pressure (atmospheric) storage tanks. Symp. Ser. 151, 1–13 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Taveau, Explosion of fixed roof atmospheric storage tanks, part 1: background and review of case histories. Process Saf. Prog. 30(4), 381–392 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A.M. Thyer, et al., A review of catastrophic failures of bulk liquid storage tanks. Loss Prev. Bull. 1(205), 3–11 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Mansour, Fires in Large Atmospheric Storage Tanks and Their Effect on Adjacent Tank (Loughborough University, Loughborough, 2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    API, Evaporative Loss Measurement. in Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards.Ch. 19, Sec. 2-E., Washington, DC: API (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    API, API Standard 650, Welded Steel Tanks for Oil Storage, tenth edition. Washington (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Alaska, Fire Hazard Assessment for Valdez Crude Tank Internal Floating Roofs (Alyeska Pipeline Service Company, Alaska, 2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    C.B. Ching, J.R. Lockwood, An Application Of Fire Science To An Industrial Incident Fire Safety Science Digital Archive (National University of Singapore, India, 1988)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    K.S. Yeng, Design, Construction and Operation of the Floating Roof Tank. Course ENG 4111 and ENG 4112 Research Project (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    API, Evaporative Loss From External Floating Roof Tanks (American Petroleum Institute, Washington, 1989)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Park. VOC Emissions From Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Tanks-Background Information For Proposed Standards, EPA-450/3-81-003a. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (1984)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    D.O. Nwabueze, Liquid hydrocarbon storage tank fires—how prepared is your facility? Chem. Eng. Trans. 48, 301–306 (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    EPA, Alternative Control Techniques Document: Volatile Organic Liquid Storage in Floating and Fixed Roof Tanks (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, 1994)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Manual Of Petroleum Measurement Standards: Chapter 19: Evaporative Loss Measurement, Evaporative Loss From Floating Roof Tanks. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC (1994)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    R.L. Ferry, Estimating Storage Tank Emissions-Changes Are Coming (TGB Partnership, Hillsborough, 1994)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    EPA, Benzene Emissions From Benzene Storage Tanks-Background Information For Proposed Standards. EPA-450/3-80-034a, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC (1980)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    TICO, Storage tank. Turnkey project solution. Internal Floating Roof Tank VS External Floating Roof Tank, Which Is Better?. Concept of external floating roof tank.A complete solution for tanks. Floating Roof Tank. External Floating Roof Tank. BNH. Gas tanks. Tags: Floating Roof Tank. Manufacturer, Exporter, India, Cheap CostGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    J.I. Changa, C.C. Lin, A study of storage tank accidents. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 19, 51–59 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    H. Persson, A. Lönnermark, Tank Fires: Review of Fire Incidents 1951–2003 (SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute, Borås, 2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    A.A. Israel, Lightning protection of floating roof tanks. Am. J. Eng. Res. AJER 2(10), 11–21 (2013)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    API, Verification of lightning protection requirements for above ground hydrocarbon storage tanks. API/EI Research Report (2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    LASTFIRE, Review of Escalation Mechanisms (Resource Protection International, Buckinghamshire, 1997)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    API, Interim Study-Prevention and Suppression of Fires in Large Aboveground Atmospheric Storage Tanks. API Publication 2021A (1998)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    T. Saaty, Fundamentals of the analytic network process. in The fifth international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process ISAHP. August, Kobe, Japan. (12–14), p. 1–14 (1999)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    W. Eddie, L. Heng, Application of ANP in process models: an example of strategic partnering. Build. Environ. 42, 278–287 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ş. Gür, M. Hamurcu, T. Eren, Using analytic network process and goal programming methods for project selection in the public institution. Les Cahiers MECAS 13, 36–46 (2016)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    T. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    T. Saaty, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: the Analytic Network Process (RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1996)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    A. Jafarnezhad, E. Asgharizadeh, G. Asemian, Priority of technology transfer methods in oil drilling industry by using analysis network process (ANP). Int. J. Learn. Dev. 3(5), 15–25 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    A. Valipour et al., Analytic network process (ANP) to risk assessment of gas refinery EPC projects in Iran. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 9(3), 1359–1365 (2013)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    M. Moradi, A. Fatemi, H. Soltanpanah, The risk analysis of oil projects using fuzz ANP technique. Int. Res. J. Manag. Sci. 2(2), 55–61 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    T. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Decision Making and The Analytic Network Process (ANP) for Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback:Super Decisions (2003)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    W. Atherton, J. Ash, Review Of Failures, Causes & Consequences In The Bulk Storage Industry (2007)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    D. Sullivan, P. Curran, Static Ignition Hazards When Handling Petroleum Products (Fiberglass Tank & Pipe Institute, Houston, 2013), pp. 1–10Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    R. Alaimo, Handbook of Chemical Health and Safety (American Chemical Society, Washington, 2001)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    LASTFIRE, Review of Escalation Mechanisms (Resource Protection International, Buckinghamshire, 2012)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    EPA, Guidance document for the writing of standard operating procedures Taken from United States Environmental Protection Agency Guidance for Preparing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) EPA QA/G-6 (2007)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    H. Duhon, SOPs That Operators Will Actually Want To Use: A Guide to Writing Effective SOPs (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2015), p. 31Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    L. Xu-qing, L. Quan-zhen, G. Hong, Study of fire fighting system to extinguish full surface fire of large scale floating roof tanks. Procedia Eng. 11, 189–195 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Chemguard, Fixed or Semi-Fixed Fire Protection Systems for Storage Tanks. 204 S. 6th Ave • Mansfield, Tx 76063.www.chemguard.com (2005)
  53. 53.
    P. Okoh, S. Haugen, The influence of maintenance on some selected major accidents. Chem. Eng. Trans. 31, 493–498 (2013)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    K.A. Mansour, Fires in large atmospheric storage tanks and their effect on adjacent tanks, pp. 22. Doctoral dissertation (2012)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    OGP, Risk assessment data directory storage incident frequencies. Int. Assoc. Oil Gas Prod. 3(434), 7–18 (2010)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wikipedia, External floating roof tank (2015)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    CLG, Creating a Reliability Culture:CASE STUDY. CLG • 500 Cherrington Parkway. www.clg.com (2010)
  58. 58.
    B.V, M.O.a.G., Floating Roof sinking Failure report of Condensate Tank 5E-220-TB002A. Acting Production Eng. Coordinator (2014)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    C. Lin, A safety study of oil tank farms. M.S. thesis. National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung,Taiwan, ROC (2003)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    S. Li, Oil tank fire statistical analysis. Fire Control Theory Res. 4, 117 (2004)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Y. Yao, Oil tank fire mode and behavior of the fire. Nat Gas Oil 27, 20 (2006)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    D.A. Greenwood, Differential settlement tolerance of cylindrical steel tanks for bulk liquid storage. Proceeding of the conference on settlement of structures. British geotechnical society, Cambridge, England (1974)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    S. Gazioglu, J. Withiam, Evaluation of a Differentially Settled Tank. Missouri University of Science and Technology (Scholars’ Mine) (1984)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    E2G, Pressure Relief Systems for Runaway Reactions. Engineers at E2G|The Equity Engineering Group, Inc. (2017)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    PEAC, Runaway Industrial Chemical Reactions (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Parisa Moshashaei
    • 1
  • Seyed Shamseddin Alizadeh
    • 1
  • Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi
    • 2
    • 3
  • Leila Khazini
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Health FacultyTabriz University of Medical SciencesTabrizIran
  2. 2.Road Traffic Injury Research CenterTabriz University of Medical SciencesTabrizIran
  3. 3.Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, Health FacultyTabriz University of Medical SciencesTabrizIran
  4. 4.Department of Chemical Engineering, Chemical and Petroleum Engineering FacultyTabriz UniversityTabrizIran

Personalised recommendations