Advertisement

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 1516–1525 | Cite as

Prediction of Residual Fatigue Life of Composite Mono Leaf Spring Based on Stiffness Degradation

  • N. I. JamadarEmail author
  • S. B. Kivade
  • Prathmesh Tati
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • 67 Downloads

Abstract

Estimation of remaining useful life gained considerable attention in composites technology in recent years. It is due to efficient technique to check the reliability or sustainability of components. This paper adopts the mixed-mode approaches such as experimental, analytical and finite element methods to predict the residual fatigue life of cracked composite mono leaf spring. The finite element analysis is carried out on both healthy and cracked composite springs to analyze static and fatigue life. Experimental fatigue test has been conducted on an artificially cracked leaf spring for 500 set numbers of fatigue cycles up to 2000 to record strains. These strains are used in Hwang and Han analytical model to determine the residual fatigue life of cracked spring. As a result, the residual fatigue life of cracked spring is found to be 2.48 × 106 cycles determined by the model. At the end, the stiffness degradation curve is drawn by Hwang and Han model and compared with benchmark stiffness degradation curve. The analytical model results are found to be in closer approximation with the benchmark.

Keywords

Cracked composite mono leaf spring Residual fatigue life Hwang and Han analytical model Stiffness degradation 

List of symbols

dF/dn

Fatigue modulus degradation rate

A, C, B

Material constants

Tx, Ty and Tz

Translation along x, y and z directions

Rx, Ry and Rz

Rotations along x, y and z directions

No

Fatigue modulus at 0th cycle

N

No. of applied fatigue cycles

Nf

No. of Fatigue cycles to failure

n

Difference in subsequent residual fatigue cycles

En

Stiffness of cracked spring at subsequent fatigue cycles

E1

Stiffness of cracked spring at zero fatigue cycles

K

Stiffness of spring

σmax

Maximum stress

σu

Ultimate tensile strength

Abbreviations

SG-1

Strain gauge-1

SG-2

Strain gauge-2

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research work was supported by Automotive Research Association of India, Chakan Plant, Pune, by providing the testing facility.

References

  1. 1.
    T. Peng, Y. Liu, A. Saxena, K. Goebel, In-situ fatigue life prognosis for composite laminates based on stiffness degradation. J. Compos. Struct. 132, 155–165 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Basu, Identification of stiffness degradation in structures using wavelet analysis. Constr. Build. Mater. 19, 713–772 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H.A. Whitworth, A stiffness degradation model for composite laminates under fatigue loading. J. Compos. Struct. 40(2), 95–101 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K.S. Han, W. Hwang, Fatigue life prediction and failure mechanisms of composite materials. J. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2(1), 29–50 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Adden, K. Pfleiderer, I. Solodov, P. Horst, G. Busse, Characterization of stiffness degradation caused by fatigue damage in textile composites using circumferential plate acoustic waves. J. Compos. Technol. 68, 1616–1623 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Marguères, F. Meraghni, Damage induced anisotropy and stiffness reduction evaluation in composite materials using ultrasonic wave transmission. J. Compos.: Part A. 45, 134–144 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T.P. Philippidis, A.P. Vassilopoulos, Fatigue design allowables for GRP laminates based on stiffness degradation measurements. J. Compos. Sci. Technol. 60, 2819–2828 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Murari, C.S. Upadhyay, Micromechanics based ply level material degradation model for unidirectional composites. J. Compos. Struct. 94, 671–680 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Basri, W.K. Chiu, Numerical analysis on the interaction of guided Lamb waves with a local elastic stiffness reduction in quasi-isotropic composite plate structures. J. Compos. Struct. 66, 87–97 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Zhang, A.P. Vassilopoulos, T. Keller, Stiffness degradation and fatigue life prediction of adhesively-bonded joints for fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Int. J. Fatigue. 30(10), 1813–1820 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Taheri-Behrooz, M.M. Shokrieh, L.B. Lessard, Residual stiffness in cross-ply laminates subjected to cyclic loading. J. Compos. Struct. 85(3), 205–212 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.S. Tate, A.D. Kelkar, Stiffness degradation model for biaxial braided composites under fatigue loading. J. Compos. Part B: Eng. 39(3), 548–555 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Hwang, K.S. Han, Fatigue of composites fatigue modulus concept and life prediction. J. Compos. Mater. 20(2), 154–165 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y. Yamada, K. Iwata, T. Kadowaki, T. Sumiya, Method of reduced variables for stiffness degradation process of unidirectional CFRP composites subjected to alternating bending. J. Compos. Sci. Technol. 138, 117–123 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spring Design Manual-Society of Automotive Engineers (AE-11)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ansys nCode Manual, HBM, 2010Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.VTU, Research Resource CenterBelagavi RegionIndia
  2. 2.Basavakalyan Engineering CollegeBasavakalyanIndia
  3. 3.Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of TechnologyPimpri, PuneIndia

Personalised recommendations