Advertisement

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 1099–1110 | Cite as

Determination of the Failure Susceptibility of a Flat Die Used in Biomass Pelletizing Machines by Means of FEA-Based Design Exploration

  • H. Kursat CelikEmail author
  • Hasan Yilmaz
  • Allan E. W. Rennie
  • Recep Cinar
  • M. Ziya Firat
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • 146 Downloads

Abstract

This paper focuses on a design analysis of a flat die used in an agricultural biomass pelletizing machine by considering its high-pressure loading failure susceptibility. The pellet die is one of the key elements in a pelletizing machine, and the strength of the die plate has an important role on the pellet’s quality and producibility. In fact, higher compression ratio (CR—the ratio of effective length and the internal (press channel) diameter of a die orifice/hole) will provide denser pellets which is a desired phenomenon, however, if the compression pressure is too high or CR is not determined to compensate high pressures, the raw material may block the die and the die may experience deformation failure due to overloading. If the desire is to make high-quality pellets with no die failure, optimum flat die hole/orifice design parameters should be used which can provide the best CR for a specific compression pressure. This is the core motivation of this research. In this study, finite element analysis (FEA)-based design exploration has been utilized for a sample single hole flat die with various die geometry parameters against various compression pressure values. Following the FEA design exploration undertaken, a response surface analysis (RSA) was carried out and then estimation models (empirical equations), which could be used to calculate parameters of the die hole/orifice against applied compression pressure and failure susceptibility based on structural stress and deformation, was described. The results gained from the RSA have indicated that the estimation models have high R2 values (higher than 98%) which could be used for adequately predicting failure susceptibility indicators. In addition to this, FEM-based simulation printouts have provided useful stress distribution visuals on the die against different compression pressure values. Most especially, the study has highlighted that a detailed structural optimization study may be scheduled in order to obtain die geometry design parameters with a focus on the failure susceptibility.

Keywords

Stress analysis Design of agricultural machinery Biomass pelletizing Flat die design 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research study is part-supported financially by The Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Akdeniz University (Turkey) and Lancaster Product Development Unit (LPDU) in Lancaster University (UK).

References

  1. 1.
    ABC Machinery, Pellet mill die decides your pellets production (2017a), http://www.bestbiomassmachine.com/solutions/Pellet-Mill-Die-Decides-Your-Pellets-Production.html. Accessed 28 Aug 2017
  2. 2.
    ABC Machinery, Pellet mill dies (2017b), http://www.gemco-energy.com/pellet-mill-dies.html. Accessed 28 Aug 2017
  3. 3.
    ANSYS Product Documentation, Release Notes: Chapter 5-DesignXplorer, Release 18.1 (ANSYS, Inc., 2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G.E.P. Box, N.R. Draper, Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces (Wiley, New York, 1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.L. Briggs, D.E. Maier, B.A. Watkins, K.C. Behnke, Effect of ingredients and processing parameters on pellet quality. Poult. Sci. 78, 1464–1471 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    California Pellet Mill Co. Roskamp Champion. Dies and die selection—die metallurgy (2015), https://www.cpm.net/downloads/Dies%20and%20Die%20Selection.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2017
  7. 7.
    A.R. Celma, F. Cuadros, F.L. Rodriguez, Characterization of pellets from industrial tomato residues. Food Bioprod. Process. 90, 700–706 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Ciolkosz, R. Hilton, C. Swackhamer, H. Yi, V.M. Puri, D. Swomley, G. Roth, Farm-scale biomass pelletizer performance for switchgrass pellet production. Am. Soc. Agric. Biol. Eng. 31(4), 559–567 ISSN: 0883-8542 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.31.10803
  9. 9.
    S. Döring, Power from Pellets (Springer, Berlin, 2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19962-2_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Garcia-Maraver, V. Popov, M. Zamorano, A review of European standards for pellet quality. Renew. Energy 36, 3537–3540 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Garcia-Maraver, M. Carpio, Biomass pelletization process, in Biomass Pelletization: Standards and Production, ed. by A. Garcia-Maraver, J.A. Pérez-Jiménez (WIT Press, Southampton, 2015), pp. 53–66Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.K. Holm, U.B. Henriksen, J.E. Hustad, L.H. Sorensen, Toward an understanding of controlling parameters in softwood and hardwood pellet production. Energy Fuel 20, 2686–2694 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Hu, T. Lei, S. Shen, Q. Zhang, Optimal design and evaluation of a ring die granulator for straws. BioResources 7(1), 489–503 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Jackson, A. Turner, T. Mark, M. Montross, Densification of biomass using a pilot scale flat ring roller pellet mill. Fuel Process. Technol. 148, 43–49 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Mani, L.G. Tabil, S. Sokhansanj, An overview of compaction of biomass grinds. Powder Handl. Process. 15, 160–168 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Mani, L.G. Tabil, S. Sokhansanj, Grinding performance and physical properties of wheat and barley straws, corn stover and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 27, 339–352 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Milovančević, J. Stefanović-Marinović, B. Anđelković, A. Veg, Embedded condition monitoring of power transmission of a pellet mill. Trans. Famena XXXIV(2), 71–79 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y.-H. Moon, J. Yang, B.-C. Koo, J.-W. An, Y.-L. Cha, Y.-M. Youn, G.-D. Yu, G.-H. An, K.-G. Park, I.H. Choi, Analysis of factors affecting miscanthus pellet production and pellet quality using response surface methodology. BioResources 9(2), 3334–3346 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. Nilsson, S. Bernesson, P.A. Hansson, Pellet production from agricultural raw materials—a systems study. Biomass Bioenergy 35, 679–689 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    PelHeat.com, The Beginner’s guide to pellet production (2015), http://www.pelheat.com/The_Beginners_Guide_To_Making_Pellets.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2017
  21. 21.
    J.H. Peng, H.T. Bi, C.J. Lim, S. Sokhansanj, Study on density, hardness, and moisture uptake of torrefied wood pellets. Energy Fuels 27, 967–974 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef301928q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Protić, D. Mitić, V. Stefanović, Wood pellets production technology, in Proceedings of International Conference on Safety of Technical Systems in Living and Working Environment - (STS 2011), October 27–28, 2011, Niš, Serbia, pp. 179–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Puig-Arnavat, L. Shang, Z. Sárossy, J. Ahrenfeldt, U.B. Henriksen, From a single pellet press to a bench scale pellet mill—Pelletizing six different biomass feedstocks. Fuel Process. Technol. 142, 27–33 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. Salas-Bringas, T. Filbakk, G. Skjevrak, O.I. Lekang, O. Hoibo, R.B. Schuller, Compression rheology and physical quality of wood pellets pre-handled with four different conditions. Ann. Trans. Nord. Rheol. Soc. 18, 87–93 (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Standard EN 16127. Solid biofuels—Determination of length and diameter for pellets and cylindrical briquettesGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    W. Stelte, J.K. Holm, A.R. Sanadi, S. Barsberg, J. Ahrenfeldt, U.B. Henriksen, Fuel pellets from biomass: the importance of the pelletizing pressure and its dependency on the processing conditions. Fuel 90(11), 3285–3290 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    K. Theerarattananoon, F. Xu, J. Wilson, R. Ballard, L. McKinney, S. Staggenborg, P. Vadlani, Z.J. Pei, D. Wang, Physical properties of pellets made from sorghum stalk, corn stover, wheat straw, and big bluestem. Ind. Crops Prod. 33(2), 325–332 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. Werther, M. Sanger, E.U. Hartge, T. Ogada, Z. Siagi, Combustion of agricultural residues. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 26, 1–27 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    H. Yilmaz, A research on the pelleting of various agricultural residues and determination of pellet physical properties. M.Sc. thesis, Akdeniz University, 2014. (In Turkish) Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. Zamorano, V. Popov, M.L. Rodríguez, A. García-Maraver, A comparative study of quality properties of pelletized agricultural and forestry lopping residues. Renew. Energy 36, 3133–3140 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Kursat Celik
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hasan Yilmaz
    • 1
  • Allan E. W. Rennie
    • 2
  • Recep Cinar
    • 3
  • M. Ziya Firat
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural Machinery and Technology Engineering, Faculty of AgricultureAkdeniz UniversityAntalyaTurkey
  2. 2.Lancaster Product Development Unit, Engineering DepartmentLancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  3. 3.Engineering BureauYenasoft Ltd.IstanbulTurkey
  4. 4.Department of Animal Science, Faculty of AgricultureAkdeniz UniversityAntalyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations