Bayesian Networks for Frequency Analysis in Dependability

Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

The high suppleness of Bayesian networks has led to their wide application in a variety of dependability modeling and analysis problems. The main objective of this paper is to extend the use of such powerful tool to estimate the occurrence frequency of failures and consequences in a straightforward way. Such extension is based on the employment of a transformation operator to substitute the original terms with matrices that hold the full dependability description of the corresponding element. Two simple case studies in reliability and safety contexts are treated using the suggested method whose results are validated through their comparison to the corresponding results of other classical dependability techniques.

Keywords

Bayesian networks Failure frequency Reliability modeling Safety analysis Dependability 

References

  1. 1.
    P. Weber, G. Medina-Oliva, C. Simon, B. Iung, Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 25(4), 671–682 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Zhang, V.V. Thai, Expert elicitation and Bayesian network modeling for shipping accidents: a literature review. Saf. Sci. 87, 53–62 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Bobbio, L. Portinale, M. Minichino, E. Ciancamerla, Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 71(3), 249–260 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Bearfield, W. Marsh, Generalising event trees using Bayesian networks with a case study of train derailment. Comput. Saf. Reliab. Secur. 3688, 52–66 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Badreddine, N.B. Amor, A Bayesian approach to construct bow tie diagrams for risk evaluation. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 91(3), 159–171 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Khakzad, F. Khan, P. Amyotte, Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 91(1–2), 46–53 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Barua, X. Gao, H. Pasman, M.S. Mannan, Bayesian network based dynamic operational risk assessment. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 41, 399–410 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Cai, Y. Liu, Q. Fan, A multiphase dynamic Bayesian networks methodology for the determination of safety integrity levels. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 150, 105–115 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. Villa, V. Cozzani, Application of Bayesian networks to quantitative assessment of safety barriers’ performance in the prevention of major accidents. Chem. Eng. Trans. 53, 151–156 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.A. Adedigba, F. Khan, M. Yang, Dynamic safety analysis of process systems using nonlinear and non-sequential accident model. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 111, 169–183 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Khakzad, G. Landucci, G. Reniers, Application of dynamic Bayesian network to performance assessment of fire protection systems during domino effects. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 167, 232–247 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. Dutuit, A. Rauzy, Approximate estimation of system reliability via fault trees. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 87(2), 163–172 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Hayashi, Transformation from availability expression to failure frequency expression. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 55(2), 252–261 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D.J. Smith, K.G.L. Simpson, Functional Safety: A Straightforward Guide to Applying IEC 61508 and Related Standards, 2nd edn. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    IEC 61508, Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems (International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, 2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Industrial Health and SafetyBatna 2 UniversityBatnaAlgeria

Personalised recommendations