Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 1126–1130 | Cite as

Experimental Analysis of Low-Velocity Impact Behaviors of Carbon Fiber Composite Laminates

Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • 178 Downloads

Abstract

Manufacture processing of composite laminates often leads to unequal thickness of lamina and different impact responses. However, almost all existing works neglected this problem because they considered equal thickness for each lamina. This paper aims to study the influence of unequal thickness of each lamina on the impact behaviors of composite laminates by experiments. Effects of the layup patterns and impact energy are mainly studied. Results in terms of the impact experiments of carbon fiber composite laminates show that subtle difference for the thickness of the total laminate leads to relatively large errors for the impact responses, especially for the impact force-deflection curves. Also, the ratio of absorbed energy to the impact energy increases with the specimen thickness. Therefore, the practical design of composite laminates should be taken into account this difference fully due to manufacturing.

Keywords

Composite laminates Impact experiments Manufacturing factors 

References

  1. 1.
    M. Aktas, C. Atas, B.M. Icten, R. Karakuzu, An experimental investigation of the impact response of composite laminates. Compos. Struct. 87(4), 307–313 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Atas, O. Sayman, An overall view on impact response of woven fabric composite plates. Compos. Struct. 82(3), 336–345 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Z. Aslan, R. Karakuzu, B. Okutan, The response of laminated composite plates under low-velocity impact loading. Compos. Struct. 59(PII S0263-8223(02)00185-X1), 119–127 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Sevkat, B. Liaw, F. Delale, Drop-weight impact response of hybrid composites impacted by impactor of various geometries. Mater. Des. 52, 67–77 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. de Moura, A.T. Marques, Prediction of low velocity impact damage in carbon-epoxy laminates. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 33(3), 361–368 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Davies, X. Zhang, Impact damage prediction in carbon composite structures. Int. J. Impact Eng. 16(1), 149–170 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Pappada, R. Rametta, A. Largo, A. Maffezzoli, Low-velocity impact response in composite plates embedding shape memory alloy wires. Polym. Compos. 33(5), 655–664 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Lei, Z. Wang, L. Tong, X. Tang, Macroscopic mechanical characterization of SMAs fiber-reinforced hybrid composite under uniaxial loading. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 22(10), 3055–3062 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Sayer, N.B. Bektas, O. Sayman, An experimental investigation on the impact behavior of hybrid composite plates. Compos. Struct. 92(5), 1256–1262 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fibre reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight impact event, ASTM D 7136/D 7136M-05 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L.S. Kistler, A.M. Waas, Experiment and analysis on the response of curved laminated composite panels subjected to low velocity impact. Int. J. Impact Eng. 21(9), 711–736 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Sun, Z.Q. Wang, B. Yang, X.K. Sun, Experimental investigation of GF/epoxy laminates with different SMAs positions subjected to low-velocity impact. Compos. Struct. 171, 170–184 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Kim, M. Rim, I. Lee, T. Hwang, Composite damage model based on continuum damage mechanics and low velocity impact analysis of composite plates. Compos. Struct. 95, 123–134 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Faggiani, B.G. Falzon, Predicting low-velocity impact damage on a stiffened composite panel. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 41(6), 737–749 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H.E. Johnson, L.A. Louca, S. Mouring, A.S. Fallah, Modelling impact damage in marine composite panels. Int. J. Impact Eng. 36(1), 25–39 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    C.S. Lopes, O. Seresta, Y. Coquet, Z. Gurdal, P.P. Camanho, B. Thuis, Low-velocity impact damage on dispersed stacking sequence laminates. Part I: experiments. Compos. Sci. Technol. 69(7–8), 926–936 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    F. Aymerich, C. Pani, P. Priolo, Damage response of stitched cross-ply laminates under impact loadings. Eng. Fract. Mech. 74(4), 500–514 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. Aymerich, C. Pani, P. Priolo, Effect of stitching on the low-velocity impact response of [0(3)/90(3)](s) graphite/epoxy laminates. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 38(4), 1174–1182 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    F. Aymerich, F. Dore, P. Priolo, Prediction of impact-induced delamination in cross-ply composite laminates using cohesive interface elements. Compos. Sci. Technol. 68(12SI), 2383–2390 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. Ghelli, G. Minak, Low velocity impact and compression after impact tests on thin carbon/epoxy laminates. Compos. Part B Eng. 42(7), 2067–2079 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Chemical Machinery and Process Equipment, School of Energy EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations