Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 349–353 | Cite as

Corrosion Failure Analysis on Heat Exchanger Pipes

  • Zheng Qiankun
  • Shi Yafei
  • Rao Sixian
  • Li Huifeng
  • Zhu Xingjiang
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • 316 Downloads

Abstract

The heat exchange pipes in one synthetic ammonia plant were in use for only thirteen months, but obvious leakage occurred in the pipes. Investigations indicated that corrosion of the pipes was quite serious, resulting in corrosion pits penetrating the pipes in some spots. Analysis on the metallurgical structure indicated that no problems existed on the pipe material AISI 1020 low carbon steel; the corrosion inhibitors or scale inhibitors were added in the circulating water. The only problem was deduced to exist in the maintenance of the pipes during the idling period; survey of the maintenance of the pipes during the idling period proved the deduction above. Since no effective measures were taken to protect the pipes in the coolers and the circulating water was not emptied, the corrosion products and scales deposited on the pipes and formed local occluded cells; the occluded cells accelerated the pitting corrosion of the pipes and induced leakage in a short time.

Keywords

Pitting Microstructure Failure analysis Corrosion failure analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    J. Dejun, Present situation and development of technology for ammonia synthetic process. Mod. Chem. Ind. 08, 9–14 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. Liang, B. Ji, Failure analysis of corrosion leakage for oil pipeline. Surf. Technol. 08, 68–73 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Zhang, M. Xu, X. Liu, L. Guo, Y. Guo, L. Wang, H. Wang, Corrosion perforation failure analysis of a natural gas pipeline. Total Corros. Control 04, 65–67 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Zhang, Y. Li, Y. Chen, Failure analysis on cracking of hydrogenation reactor distillate lead-out pipeline. Petro-Chem. Equip. 01, 96–98 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Q. Ma, S. You, J. Jia, L. An, Surficial aluminizing of AISI 1020 steel in molten salts and aluminizing mechanism. J. Lanzhou Univ. Technol. 03, 10–12 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Cui, X. Cao, Z. Feng, Corrosion pit morphology on the impact of oil and gas pipeline failure pressure. J. Ship Mech. Z1, 124–131 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Zhang, Tahe oilfield gas pipeline corrosion characteristics and rules. Sci. Technol. Rev. 31, 65–70 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Hu, M. Li, Study on corrosion mechanism and protection of buried oil and gas pipeline. J. Oil Gas Technol. 06, 367–368 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Ma, H. Zhang, The corrosion mechanism of oil and gas pipelines. Chem. Eng. Equip. 11, 121–122 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Niu, Study of the oil transportation pipeline corrosion and corrosion rate prediction. Pipeline Tech. Equip. 05, 45–47 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Z. Li, X. Shang, H. Hao, M. Wang, Y. Xie, Screening test methods for inhibitors used for oil and gas gathering pipelines. Corros. Prot. 03, 177–180 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. Xu, L. Wei, Z. Liu, A. Sun, J. Lin, Y. Xue, T. Li, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, D. Lei, Analysis of reasons for subsea pipeline perforation. Corros. Prot. 08, 683–687 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zheng Qiankun
    • 1
  • Shi Yafei
    • 1
  • Rao Sixian
    • 1
  • Li Huifeng
    • 1
  • Zhu Xingjiang
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringAnhui University of TechnologyMa’anshanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.National Machine Quality Supervision and Inspection CenterMa’anshanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations