Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 90–100 | Cite as

Simulation of the Crack Propagation in Rocks Using Fracture Mechanics Approach

Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed

Abstract

Crack propagation in brittle rock was simulated under different conditions to describe fracturing behavior of rocks due to the applied stress e.g., water pressure. It is assumed that pre-existing cracks initiate and propagate from the edges of the borehole. The two-dimensional finite element fracture code Franc2D with the non-cohesive method was used for computing the stress intensity factor (SIF), energy-release rates (G), and crack propagation and fracturing time. Static tensile and normal-distributed stresses were used within Franc2D to describe the fracture creation and propagation. Therefore, the pressure inside the bore hole was distributed as a tensile load along with the crack faces. Different scenarios were simulated by changing the boundary conditions, crack initiation, and propagation paths. The SIF determines the amount of tensile failure that is required to create a fracture. Then, the injection rate and pressure can be determined. The direction of fracturing is perpendicular to the maximum applied stresses. The crack propagation direction was compared with experimental observations taken from the literature. The predefined SIF solutions were modified according to the Franc2D solutions. Hence, the ability to use Franc2D for fracture simulation in brittle rock was demonstrated.

Keywords

Brittle materials fracturing Crack propagation Franc2D Hydraulic fracture Linear elastic fracture mechanics Rock fracturing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is a part of the Post doctorate research project ‘Hot Dry Rock’. Support from the Institute of Geology, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany and from the Institute of International Education (IIE), USA is gratefully appreciated.

References

  1. 1.
    A.P. Bunger, J. Mclennan, R. Jeffrey, in Effective And Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing, Brisbane, vol. 9, pp. 9–10Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.-Q. Xiao, D.-X. Ding, F.-L. Jiang, G. Xu, Fatigue damage variable and evolution of rock subjected to cyclic loading. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 47(3), 461–468 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Singhal, R. Gupta, Applied Hydrogeology of Fractured Rocks (Springer, New York, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Adachi, E. Siebrits, A. Peirce, J. Desroches, Computer simulation of hydraulic fractures. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 44(5), 739–757 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Q. Rao, Z. Sun, O. Stephansson, C. Li, B. Stillborg, Shear fracture (Mode II) of brittle rock. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40(3), 355–375 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L.H.S.W. Cui, A.D. Cheng, D.H.S.W. Leshchinsky, Y.H.S.W. Abousleiman, J.C. Roegiers, Stability analysis of an inclined borehole in an isotropic poroelastic medium, in 35th US Symp. Rock Mech. (1995).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cornell Fracture Group, FRANC2D Version 3.2 (2010). [Online]. Available: http://www.cfg.cornell.edu/software/franc2d_casca.htm. Accessed 07 Jul 2013
  8. 8.
    A.M. Al-Mukhtar, H. Biermann, P. Hübner, S. Henkel, Determination of some parameters for fatigue life in welded joints using fracture mechanics method. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 19(9), 1225–1234 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.C. Hee, A.D. Jefferson, Two Dimensional Analysis of a Gravity Dam Using The Program (Cardiff University, Cardiff, 2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A.M. Al-Mukhtar, The Safety analysis concept of welded components under cyclic loads using components under cyclic loads using (Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, 2010).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Erdogan, G.C. Sih, On the crack extension in plates under plane loading and transverse shear. J. Fluids Eng. 85(4), 519–525 (1963)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B.K. Atkinson, H.B. Jovanovich, Fracture Mechanics (Academic Press, New York, 1987)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.L. Miskimins, S. Green, Hydraulic Fracturing Laboratory Test on a Rock with Artificial Discontinuities (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Casas, J. Miskimins, A. Black, S. Green, Laboratory hydraulic fracturing test on a rock with artificial discontinuities. Proc. SPE Annu. Tech. Conf. Exhib. (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Wawrzynek, A. Ingraffea, FRANC2D-A Two Dimensional Crack Propagation Simulator, Version 2.7: User’s Guide, 1993Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. Murdoch, J. Richardson, Forms and sand transport in shallow hydraulic fractures in residual soil. Can. Geotech. J. 1073, 1061–1073 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Chen, H. Tang. Method to calculate fatigue fracture life of control fissure in perilous rock. Appl. Math. Mech. 28, 643–649 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    B.J. Carter, A.R. Ingraffea, T. Engelder, Modeling Ithaca’ s Natural Hydraulic Fractures (A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    C. Zhao, H. Matsuda, C. Morita, M.R. Shen, Study on failure characteristic of rock-like materials with an open-hole under uniaxial compression. Strain 47(5), 405–413 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Geosciences, Geoengineering and Mining, Institute of GeologyTechnische Universität Bergakademie FreibergFreibergGermany
  2. 2.Al-Khawrizmie College of EngineeringBaghdad UniversityBaghdadIraq
  3. 3.Faculty of Engineering, Chemical Engineering DepartmentSoran UniversityKurdistan regionIraq

Personalised recommendations