Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 218–225 | Cite as

Structural Health Monitoring of Railroad Wheels Using Wheel Impact Load Detectors

Peer Reviewed

Abstract

This paper proposes two quantitative criteria for removing railroad wheels from service, based on real-time structural health monitoring trends that are developed using data collected from trains while in service. The data is collected using wheel impact load detectors (WILDs). These impact load trends are able to distinguish wheels with a high probability of failure from high-impact wheels with a low probability of failure. The trends indicate the critical wheels that actually need to be removed, while at the same time allowing wheels that aren’t critical to remain in service. As a result, the safety of the railroad will be much improved by being able to identify and remove wheels that have high likelihood of causing catastrophic failures.

Keywords

Catastrophic failure Crack growth rate Data interpretation Failure analysis Nondestructive testing Structural health monitoring 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research reported in this paper was supported by funds from Union Pacific Railroad and Meridian Railroad (Research Agreement No. 18140, Monitors: Rex Beck and Todd Snyder). The support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee, M.L., Chiu, W.K.: A comparative study on impact force prediction on a railway track-like structure. Struct. Health Monit. 4(4), 355–376 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gustavson, R.: Static and dynamic finite element analysis of concrete sleepers. Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Union Pacific Railroad, Omaha, NE. Information collected from Union Pacific Railroad laboratory database, retrieved by Brant Stratman on May 10, 2004 thru August 13, 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tanaka, T., Kinoshita, K., Nakayama, H.: Effect of loading time on high cycle range impact fatigue strength and impact fatigue crack growth. JSME Int. J. Ser. 1 35(1), 108–116 (1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheng, Y., Chen, D., Nogata, F.: Fatigue behaviour of a rail steel under low and high loading rates. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 17(1), 113–118 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Association of American Railroads: 2005 Field Manual of the AAR Interchange Rules, Rule 41, AAR, pp. 268–325 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kalay, S., Tajaddini, A.: Condemning wheels due to impact loads: preliminary survey—six railroads experience. AAR Report R-754, February 1990Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barke, D., Chiu, W.K.: Structural health monitoring in the railway industry: A review. Struct. Health Monit. 4(1), 81–93 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johansson, A., Nielsen, J.: Railway wheel out-of-roundness – Influence of wheel-rail contact forces and track response. 13th International Wheelset Conference, Rome, Italy (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kalay, S., Tajaddini, A., Stone, D.H.: Detecting wheel tread surface anomalies. Rail Transportation – 1992 American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, USA, pp. 165–174 (1992)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Partington, W.: Wheel impact load monitoring. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. Transport 100(4), 243–245 (1993)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lonsdale, C., Pilch, J., Dedmon, S.: Stress effects of wheel impact loads. Proceedings of the 14th International Wheelset Congress, Orlando, FL, 6–12 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bladon, K.: In: Barke, D.W. (ed.) Function of wayside wheel impact monitors, Adelaide, Australia (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tournay, H.M., Mulder, J.M.: The transition from the wear to the stress regime. Wear 191, 107–112 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stone, D.H., Moyar, G.J.: Wheel shelling and spalling – An interpretive review. Rail Transp. ASME 19–31 (1989)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marais, J.J.: Wheel failures on heavy haul freight wheels due to subsurface effects. Proceedings of the 12th International Wheelset Congress, Qingdao, China, pp. 306–314 (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mutton, P.J., Epp, C.J., Dudek, J.: Rolling contact fatigue in railway wheels under high axle loads. Wear 144, 139–152 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Giammarise, A.W., Gilmore, R.S.: Wheel quality: A North American locomotive builder’s perspective. GE Research & Development Center, CRD140, September 2001Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stone, D.H., Majumder, G., Bowaj, V.S.: Shattered rim wheel defects and the effect of lateral loads and brake heating on their growth, November 17–22, 2002. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 1–4 (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ekberg, A., Kabo, E., Andersson, H.: An engineering model for prediction of rolling contact fatigue of railway wheels. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 25, 899–909 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stone, D.H.: Wheel shattered rims – An interpretive review. Wheels and Axles, Cost Effective Engineering, ImechE Seminar Publication, pp. 75–84 (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beretta, S., Roberti, A., Ghidini, A., Donzella, G.: Deep shelling in railway wheels, September 2001. Proceedings of the 13th International Wheelset Congress, Rome, Italy, paper 23 (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stone, D.H., Kalay, S.F., Lonsdale, C.P.: Effect of wheel impact loading on shattered rims, September 2001. Proceedings of the 13th International Wheelset Congress, Rome, Italy, paper 2 (2001)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Berge, S.: Shattered rim fracture research, October 19–20, 2000. Proceedings of the 2000 Brenco Rail Conference, LaQuinta, California (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stone, D.H., Geoffrey, E.D.: The effect of discontinuity size on the initiation of shattered rim defects. ASME Transp. Div. 19, 7–14 (2000)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gordon, J., Perlman, A.B.: Estimation of residual stresses in railroad commuter car wheels following manufacture. Proc. Int. Mech. Eng. Cong. Exhibition ASME RTD 15, 13–18 (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brant Stratman
    • 1
  • Yongming Liu
    • 1
  • Sankaran Mahadevan
    • 1
  1. 1.Vanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations