Investigation of CMAS Resistance of Sacrificial Suspension Sprayed Alumina Topcoats on EB-PVD 7YSZ Layers
- 43 Downloads
Molten calcium–magnesium–aluminum–silicate (CMAS) mineral particles cause significant degradation of thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) in aero-engines. One approach to protect the TBC coating against the CMAS attack is the application of a sacrificial coating on top of the TBC coating. In this work, Al2O3 coatings were deposited on EB-PVD 7YSZ layers using suspension plasma spraying (SPS) and suspension high velocity oxy-fuel spraying (SHVOF), in order to produce sacrificial topcoats with two different microstructures and porosity levels. The coating systems were tested under CMAS attack with one natural volcanic ash and two artificial CMAS powders by conducting infiltration tests at 1250 °C in the time intervals between 5 min and 10 h. It was found that the porosity and morphology of suspension sprayed alumina topcoats, the chemical composition of the deposits and the infiltration conditions strongly influence the CMAS infiltration, reaction kinetics and formation of the reaction products. While the porous SPS coatings offer limited resistance against CMAS infiltration, the dense SHVOF coatings show promising CMAS sealing behavior. Among the formed reaction products, only (Fe, Mg) Al spinel acted as an efficient barrier against CMAS infiltration. However, the formation of uniform spinel layers strongly depends on the pore morphology of the sacrificial coating and the CMAS chemistry.
Keywords7YSZ Al2O3 CMAS EB-PVD sacrificial coating suspension spraying thermal barrier coatings
The authors express their gratitude to J. Brien, A. Handwerk and D. Peters from DLR Cologne for producing of the EB-PVD 7YSZ layers, as well as for technical support and advisory. The work was performed in the Framework of the Research Project DFG No. SCHU 1372/5 1, LE1373/34-1 funded by DFG-Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation). The authors acknowledge the financial support.
- 5.R. Naraparaju, U. Schulz, P. Mechnich, P. Döbber, and F. Seidel, Degradation Study of 7 wt.% Yttria Stabilised Zirconia (7YSZ) Thermal Barrier Coatings on Aero-Engine Combustion Chamber Parts Due to Infiltration by Different CaO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2 Variants, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2014, 260, p 73-81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.R. Naraparaju, J.J.G. Chavez, P. Niemeyer, K.U. Hess, W.J. Song, D.B. Dingwell, S. Lokachari, C.V. Ramana, and U. Schulz, Estimation of CMAS Infiltration Depth in EB-PVD TBCs: A New Constraint Model Supported with Experimental Approach, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2019, 39(9), p 2936-2945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.L.-M. Berger, F.-L. Toma, and A. Potthoff, Thermal Spraying with Suspensions: An Economic Spray Process, Therm. Spray Bull., 2013, 6(2), p 98-101Google Scholar
- 22.M. Barbosa, F.-L. Toma, D. Beitelschmidt, O. Ligabue, S. Bursich, and L. Tagliaferri, Suspension sprayed YSZ thermal barrier coatings: road to industrial application, ITSC 2018—Proceedings of the International Thermal Spray Conference, F. Azarmi, T. Eden, T. Hussain, Y.-C. Lau, H. Li, K. Shinoda, F.-L. Toma, and J. Veilleux, Ed., ASM International, Orlando, 2018, p 113-119Google Scholar
- 25.E.M. Levin, C.R. Robbins, and H.F. McMurdie, in Phase Diagrams for Ceramists, Vol. I, The American Ceramic Society, Columbus, OH, 1964, p 210, 219, 246Google Scholar