Advertisement

Performance Comparison of Double-Layer Liner for Shaped Charge Fabricated Using Kinetic Spray

  • Seungtae Lee
  • Jaeick Kim
  • Kim Seejo 
  • Seong Lee
  • Jaechul Jeong
  • Changhee Lee
Peer Reviewed
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

Shaped charge (SC) ammunition is a weapon designed to penetrate armor. The functions of the liner, which is a core component of the SC, are penetration and explosion. Because of the increasing necessity for the liner with both penetrating and demolition functions, a double-layer liner was produced which could cause explosion after penetration (penetration–explosion effect, PE). A double-layer liner was designed to increase the explosive power of the SC and to enhance the SC’s performance by PE effect. Reactive Al and Al-Ni coatings were successfully deposited on the conical Cu liner via kinetic spray to fabricate the double-layer liner. A ballistic test was conducted to compare the explosive power between a single Cu liner and double-layer liners and to identify the PE effect. By measuring the penetration area of the target plate and the number of broken support bolts, the liner’s explosive power was compared and determined. The explosive power of double-layer liner was stronger than that of the single Cu liner. Alumina and an intermetallic compound of Al-Ni, both of which are evidence of exothermic reactions, were investigated using EDS and XRD techniques.

Keywords

Al-Ni composite ballistic test double-layer liner kinetic spray shaped charge 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by an Agency for Defense Development (ADD) grant funded by the Korean government (MOST) (No. 111115-911004001).

References

  1. 1.
    P. Chou and W. Flis, Recent Developments in Shaped Charge Technology, Propellants Explos. Pyrotech., 1986, 11(4), p 99-114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.P. Walters and J.A. Zukas, Fundamentals of Shaped Charges, Wiley, New York, 1989Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Birkhoff, D.P. MacDougall, E.M. Pugh, and S.G. Taylor, Explosives with Lined Cavities, J. Appl. Phys., 1948, 19(6), p 563-582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.R. Kennedy, History of the Shaped Charge Effect: The First 100 Years, Defense Technical Information Center, Fort Belvoir, 1990Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.R. Bell, J.T. Hardesty, and N.G. Clark, Reactive Perforating: Conventional and Unconventional Applications, Learnings and Opportunities, in 8th European Formation Damage Conference, May 27-29, 2009 (Netherland), Society of Petroleum EngineersGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Saran, O. Ayısıt, and M.S. Yavuz, Experimental Investigations on Aluminum Shaped Charge Liners, Procedia Eng., 2013, 58, p 479-486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Walters, and A.P. Ground, An Overview of the Shaped Charge Concept, in 11th Annual ARL/USMA Technical Symposium, 2003Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Hasenberg, Consequences of Coaxial Jet Penetration Performance and Shaped Charge Design Criteria. Master Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, 2010Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.J. Kim, S.H. Mun, K.A. Lee, C.H. Lee, and S. Lee, Manufacturing and Evaluating for the Two Layer/Explosive Materials and Their Numerical Simulations, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2014, 767, p 52-59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Smith, J. Brockmann, R. Dykhuizen, D. Gilmore, R. Neiser, and T. Roemer, Cold Spray Direct Fabrication-High Rate, Solid State, Material Consolidation, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 1998, 542, p 65-76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E.H. Kwon, S.H. Cho, J.W. Han, C.H. Lee, and H.J. Kim, Particle Behavior in Supersonic Flow During the Cold Spray Process, Met. Mater. Int., 2005, 11(5), p 377-381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Byun, J. Kim, C. Lee, S.J. Kim, and S. Lee, Kinetic Spraying Deposition of Reactive-Enhanced Al-Ni Composite for Shaped Charge Liner Applications, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2016, 25(3), p 483-493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Won, G. Bae, K. Kang, C. Lee, S.J. Kim, K.-A. Lee, and S. Lee, Bonding, Reactivity, and Mechanical Properties of the Kinetic-sprayed Deposition of Al for a Thermally Activated Reactive Cu Liner, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2014, 23(5), p 818-826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Alkhimov, V. Kosarev, and S. Klinkov, The Features of Cold Spray Nozzle Design, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2001, 10(2), p 375-381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Wu, H. Fang, S. Yoon, H. Kim, and C. Lee, Measurement of Particle Velocity and Characterization of Deposition in Aluminum Alloy Kinetic Spraying Process, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2005, 252(5), p 1368-1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    W.P. Walters and S.K. Golaski, Hemispherical and Conical Shaped-Charge Liner Collapse and Jet Formation, US Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, Adelphi, 1987Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    W.P. Walters, Shock Waves in the Study of Shaped Charges, US Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, Adelphi, 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mechanical Properties of Fasteners—Bolts, Screws, Studs and Nuts Made of Non-Ferrous Metals. ISO 8839, Standard Catalogue for ISO, International Organization for Standardization, 1986Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. Xi, L. Jinxu, L. Shukui, L. Cuicui, G. Wenqi, and W. Tengteng, Effect of Interaction Mechanism between Jet and Target on Penetration Performance of Shaped Charge Liner, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 553, p 142-148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Held, Liners for Shaped Charges, J. Battlef. Technol., 2001, 4(3), p 1-7Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Xiao, X. Zhang, Y. Wang, F. Xu, and H. Wang, Demolition Mechanism and Behavior of Shaped Charge with Reactive Liner, Propellants Explos. Pyrotech., 2016, 41(4), p 612-617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M.A. Trunov, M. Schoenitz, and E. Dreizin, Effect of Polymorphic Phase Transformations in Alumina Layer on Ignition of Aluminium Particles, Combust. Theor. Model., 2006, 10(4), p 603-623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Biswas and S. Roy, Comparison Between the Microstructural Evolutions of Two Modes of SHS of NiAl: Key to a Common Reaction Mechanism, Acta Mater., 2004, 52(2), p 257-270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    P. Church, R. Claridge, P. Ottley, I. Lewtas, N. Harrison, P. Gould, C. Braithwaite, and D. Williamson, Investigation of a Nickel-Aluminum Reactive Shaped Charge Liner, J. Appl. Mech., 2013, 80(3), p 031701CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seungtae Lee
    • 1
  • Jaeick Kim
    • 1
  • Kim Seejo 
    • 2
  • Seong Lee
    • 3
  • Jaechul Jeong
    • 4
  • Changhee Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Kinetic Spraying Coating Laboratory, Division of Materials Science and EngineeringHanyang UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Design EngineeringAndong National UniversityAndongRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.The 4th Research and Development InstituteAgency for Defense DevelopmentDaejeonRepublic of Korea
  4. 4.Ammunition Systems Department, Defence R&D CenterHanwha CorporationDaejeonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations