Journal of Thermal Spray Technology

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 852–859 | Cite as

Examination on Substrate Preheating Process in Cold Gas Dynamic Spraying

Peer Reviewed

Abstract

Substrate preheating always takes an important role in particle bonding and formation of the first layer coating in cold gas dynamic spraying (CGDS). In this study, a systemic investigation on substrate preheating process is conducted with Cu, Al, Steel, and Ti substrate by both numerical and experimental methods. The computational fluid dynamic (CFD) approach is adopted to simulate the heat exchange process between gas and solid substrate. The numerical results show that substrate can be significantly preheated by the high-temperature gas, especially by the gas at the near-wall zone behind the bow shock where the temperature is extremely high. Moreover, the comparison between different substrates implies that substrates with smaller thermal conductivity can achieve higher surface temperature and larger temperature gradient which may greatly contribute to the generation of residual stress, such as Ti substrate in this study. For the heat flux, Cu substrate obtains the largest value at the center zone of the substrate surface, followed by Al, Steel, and Ti substrate, but at the outer zone, the heat flux through the Cu substrate surface is smaller than the other three types of substrates. Besides, based on the experimental results, it is found that the substrate surface temperature amounts to the peak value only when the preheating time is sufficiently long.

Keywords

cold gas dynamic spraying heat transfer numerical simulation substrate preheating surface temperature 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 50476075) and the Chinese Ministry of Education’s Academic Award for Outstanding Doctoral Student.

References

  1. 1.
    A.P. Alkimov, V.F. Kosarev, and A.N. Papyrin, A Method of Cold Gas Dynamic Deposition, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, 1990, 315(5), p 1062-1065Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.C. Dykhuizen and M.F. Smith, Gas Dynamic Principles of Cold Spray, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 1998, 7(2), p 205-212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Papyrin, Cold Spray Technology, Adv. Mater. Process., 2001, 159(9), p 49-51Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Assadi, F. Gärtner, T. Stoltenhoff, and H. Kreye, Bonding Mechanism in Cold Gas Spraying, Acta Mater., 2003, 51(15), p 4379-4394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Bae, Y. Xiong, S. Kumar, K. Kang, and C. Lee, General Aspects of Interface Bonding in Kinetic Sprayed Coatings, Acta Mater., 2008, 56(17), p 4858-4868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Schmidt, H. Assadi, F. Gärtner, H. Richter, T. Stoltenhoff, H. Kreye, and T. Klassen, From Particle Acceleration to Impact and Bonding in Cold Spraying, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2009, 18(5-6), p 794-808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W.-Y. Li and C.-J. Li, Optimal Design of a Novel Cold Spray Gun Nozzle at a Limited Space, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2005, 14(3), p 391-396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W.-Y. Li, H. Liao, H.-T. Wang, C.-J. Li, G. Zhang, and C. Coddet, Optimal Design of Convergent-Barrel Cold Spray Nozzle by Numerical Method, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2006, 253(2), p 708-713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Fukumoto, H. Wada, K. Tanabe, M. Yamada, E. Yamaguchi, A. Niwa, M. Sugimoto, and M. Izawa, Effect of Substrate Temperature on Deposition Behavior of Copper Particles on Substrate Surfaces in the Cold Spray Process, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2007, 16(5-6), p 643-650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.G. Legoux, E. Irissou, and C. Moreau, Effect of Substrate Temperature on the Formation Mechanism of Cold-Sprayed Aluminum, Zinc and Tin Coatings, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2007, 16(5-6), p 619-626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.C. King, G. Bae, S.H. Zahiri, M. Jahedi, and C. Lee, An Experimental and Finite Element Study of Cold Spray Copper Impact onto Two Aluminum Substrates, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2010, 19(3), p 620-634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T.-C. Jen, L.-J. Li, W.-Z. Cui, Q.-H. Chen, and X.-M. Zhang, Numerical Investigations on Cold Gas Dynamic Spray Process with Nano- and Microsize Particles, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2005, 48(21-22), p 4384-4396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Samareh and A. Dolatabadi, A Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Cold Spray Process: The Effects of Substrate Location and Shape, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2007, 16(5-6), p 634-642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Karimi, A. Fartaj, G. Rankin, D. Vanderzwet, W. Birtch, and J. Villafuerte, Numerical Simulation of the Cold Gas Dynamic Spray Process, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2005, 15(4), p 518-523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. Samareh, O. Stier, V. Lüthen, and A. Dolatabadi, Assessment of CFD Modeling via Flow Visualization in Cold Spray Process, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2009, 18(5-6), p 934-943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    FLUENT Inc., FLUENT Manual, Lebanon, NH, 1990Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    V.F. Kosarev, S.V. Klinkov, A.P. Alkhimov, and A.N. Papyrin, On Some Aspects of Gas Dynamics of the Cold Spray Process, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2003, 12(2), p 265-281CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shuo Yin
    • 1
  • Xiao-fang Wang
    • 1
  • Wen-ya Li
    • 2
  • Xue-ping Guo
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Energy and Power EngineeringDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina
  2. 2.Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Friction Welding Technologies, School of Materials Science and EngineeringNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anChina
  3. 3.LERMPS (Laboratoire d’Etudes et de Recherches sur les Matériaux, les Procédés et les Surfaces)Université de Technologie de Belfort-MontbéliardBelfort CedexFrance
  4. 4.Marine Engineering CollegeDalian Maritime UniversityDalianChina

Personalised recommendations