Skip to main content
Log in

Quasi-Static Compression and Deformation Behavior of Additively Manufactured Flexible Polymeric Lattice Structure

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of unit cell configuration and relative density on compression behavior, deformation mechanism and energy absorption capacity of body centered cubic (BCC) flexible polymeric lattice structures was experimentally investigated in this work. Three different types of BCC cell configurations i.e. uniform cell (UBCC), uniform with z-axis reinforced cell (UBCCz) and graded cell (GBCC) were additively manufactured through digital light processing 3D printing process. Quasi static compressive testing was carried out to determine the mechanical response of lattice structures and significant effect of cell architecture and relative density on compression and strength properties were observed. The experimental results show that irrespective of lattice type the elastic modulus and collapse strength of each lattice increases with increasing relative density. However, the modulus and strength for UBCCz is higher than other two configurations due to additional vertical strut which add extra stiffening in loading direction. UBCCz lattice also showed high energy absorption capacity followed by UBCC and GBCC lattice. It was also determined that for any fixed relative density, different lattice configurations show different stress-strain behavior and deformation modes due to unique unit cell construction. The non-graded lattice shows a uniform overall deformation while gradient lattice shows layer by layer collapse. The work proposed that lattice relative density and cell configuration can be steered to improve the overall stiffness and strength of flexible lattice structures in energy absorption applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time due to legal or ethical reasons. However, the same can be provided to desirous on demand through email after publication of the submitted manuscript.

References

  1. M. Helou and S. Kara, Design, Analysis and Manufacturing of Lattice Structures: An Overview, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 2018, 31(3), p 243–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Panesar, M. Abdi, D. Hickman and I. Ashcroft, Strategies for Functionally Graded Lattice Structures Derived Using Topology Optimisation for Additive Manufacturing, Addit. Manuf., 2018, 19, p 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Al Rifaie, A. Mian and R. Srinivasan, Compression Behavior of Three-Dimensional Printed Polymer Lattice Structures, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. L, 2019, 233(8), p 1574–1584.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Wicks and J.W. Hutchinson, Optimal Truss Plates, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2001, 38(30–31), p 5165–5183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buckminster FR, inventor. Synergetic Building Construction. United States patent US 2,986,241 (1961)

  6. S. Hyun, A.M. Karlsson, S. Torquato and A.G. Evans, Simulated Properties of Kagomé and Tetragonal Truss Core Panels, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2003, 40(25), p 6989–6998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Meng, W. Zhang, D. Quan, G. Shi, L. Tang, Y. Hou, P. Breitkopf, J. Zhu and T. Gao, From Topology Optimization Design to Additive Manufacturing: Today’s Success and Tomorrow’s Roadmap, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 2020, 27(3), p 805–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. V.S. Deshpande, N.A. Fleck and M.F. Ashby, Effective Properties of the Octet-Truss Lattice Material, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2001, 49(8), p 1747–1769.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. H.J. Rathbun, Z. Wei, M.Y. He, F.W. Zok, A.G. Evans, D.J. Sypeck and H.N. Wadley, Measurement and Simulation of the Performance of a Lightweight Metallic Sandwich Structure with a Tetrahedral Truss Core, J. Appl. Mech., 2004, 71(3), p 368–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Tang, G. Dong, Q. Zhou and Y.F. Zhao, Lattice Structure Design and Optimization with Additive Manufacturing Constraints, IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., 2017, 15(4), p 1546–1562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Wang, C. Xie, R. He, G. Ding, K. Zhang, G. Wang and D. Fang, Polymer-Derived Silicon Nitride Ceramics by Digital Light Processing Based Additive Manufacturing, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2019, 102(9), p 5117–5126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. S.L. Sing, W.Y. Yeong, F.E. Wiria and B.Y. Tay, Characterization of Titanium Lattice Structures Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting Using an Adapted Compressive Test Method, Exp. Mech., 2016, 56(5), p 735–748.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rehme, O.: Cellular Design for Laser Freeform Fabrication. Cuvillier Verlag (2010)

  14. K. Ushijima, W.J. Cantwell, R.A. Mines, S. Tsopanos and M. Smith, An Investigation into the Compressive Properties of Stainless Steel Micro-Lattice Structures, J. Sandw. Struct. Mater., 2011, 13(3), p 303–329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Ushijima, W.J. Cantwell and D.H. Chen, Prediction of the Mechanical Properties of Micro-Lattice Structures Subjected to Multi-Axial Loading, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2013, 1(68), p 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Tancogne-Dejean and D. Mohr, Stiffness and Specific Energy Absorption of Additively-Manufactured Metallic BCC Metamaterials Composed of Tapered Beams, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2018, 141, p 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R.A. Mines, S. Tsopanos, Y. Shen, R. Hasan and S.T. McKown, Drop Weight Impact Behaviour of Sandwich Panels with Metallic Micro Lattice Cores, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2013, 60, p 120–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. H.S. Abdulhadi and A. Mian, Effect of Strut Length and Orientation on Elastic Mechanical Response of Modified Body-Centered Cubic Lattice Structures, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L, 2019, 233(11), p 2219–2233.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Al Rifaie, M.J.: Resilience and Toughness Behavior of 3D-Printed Polymer Lattice Structures: Testing and Modeling. Doctoral dissertation, Wright State University (2017).

  20. S. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Xu, W. Zhang and J. Zhu, Compressive Behavior and Energy Absorption of Polymeric Lattice Structures Made by Additive Manufacturing, Front. Mech. Eng., 2020, 15(2), p 319–327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Z. Liu, H. Chen and S. Xing, Mechanical Performances of Metal-Polymer Sandwich Structures with 3D-Printed Lattice Cores Subjected to Bending Load, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 2020, 20(3), p 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Li, J. Qin, B. Wang, T. Zheng and Y. Hu, Design and Compressive Behavior of a Photosensitive Resin-Based 2-D Lattice Structure with Variable Cross-Section Core, Polymers, 2019, 11(1), p 186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zheng, X., Deotte, J., Vericella, J., Shusteff, M., Weisgraber, T., Lee, H., Fang, N., Spadaccini, C.M.: Lightweight Micro Lattices with Nanoscale Features Fabricated from Projection Microstereolithography. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 27th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). pp. 510–513. IEEE (2014)

  24. J. Shen and D.S. Ricketts, Additive Manufacturing of Complex Millimeter-Wave Waveguides Structures Using Digital Light Processing, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Techn., 2019, 67(3), p 883–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. U.A. Dar, H.H. Mian, M. Abid, A. Topa, M.Z. Sheikh and M. Bilal, Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Compressive Behavior of Lattice Structures Manufactured Through Projection Micro Stereolithography, Mater. Today Commun., 2020, 25, p 101563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Guo, Y. Zeng, P. Li and J. Chen, Fine Lattice Structural Titanium Dioxide Ceramic Produced by DLP 3D Printing, Ceram. Int., 2019, 45(17), p 23007–23012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. C. He, C. Ma, X. Li, L. Yan, F. Hou, J. Liu and A. Guo, Polymer-Derived SiOC Ceramic Lattice with Thick Struts Prepared by Digital Light Processing, Addit. Manuf., 2020, 35, p 101366.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. J.H. Park and K. Park, Compressive Behavior of Soft Lattice Structures and Their Application to Functional Compliance Control, Addit. Manuf., 2020, 33, p 101148.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gautam, R., Sridharan, V.S., Teh, W.L., Idapalapati, S.: Compressive Response of Strut-Reinforced Kagome with Polyurethane Reinforcement

  30. Dar, U.A., Mian, H.H., Qadeer, A., Abid, M., Pasha, R.A., Bilal, M., Sheikh, M.Z.: Experimental and Numerical Investigation of 3D Printed Micro-Lattice Structures for High Energy Absorption Capabilities. In: Proceedings of the 2020 17th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST). pp. 162–166. IEEE (2020)

  31. T. Stanković, J. Mueller, P. Egan and K. Shea, A Generalized Optimality Criteria Method for Optimization of Additively Manufactured Multimaterial Lattice Structures, J. Mech. Des., 2015, 137(11), p 111405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work is supported by Pakistan Science Foundation (PSF) under PSF-NSFC joint research program (PSF/NSFC-II/Eng/P-COMSATS-Wah-05). The technical assistance of Dr. Muhammad Shahid (SCME & SMME, NUST) and Dr. Mirza Jamil Ahmed (DMME, PIEAS) in experimental work is highly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uzair Ahmed Dar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dar, U.A., Mian, H.H., Abid, M. et al. Quasi-Static Compression and Deformation Behavior of Additively Manufactured Flexible Polymeric Lattice Structure. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 31, 3107–3119 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06419-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06419-3

Keywords

Navigation