Advertisement

Influence of White Layer and Residual Stress Induced by Hard Cutting on Wear Resistance During Sliding Friction

  • Zhang Fangyuan
  • Duan ChunzhengEmail author
  • Sun Wei
  • Ju Kang
Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

The white layer and residual stress formed in a hard cutting process significantly influence the wear resistance of the workpiece. Orthogonal hard cutting experiments were performed on AISI 52100 steel with PCBN inserts. The results reveal that the white layer is formed on machined surfaces. Moreover, residual compressive stress exists in the white layers when the workpieces are cut by unworn tools, whereas tensile stress exists in the white layers when the workpieces are cut by worn tools. Under lubricated condition, the white layer (with the characteristics of high hardness and grain refinement) improves the resistance to abrasive wear. The high retained austenite content improves the resistance to fatigue wear. Furthermore, the residual compressive stress in the white layer inhibits the initiation and propagation of cracks, thereby increasing the fatigue wear resistance. Meanwhile, the residual tensile stress increases the speed of crack propagation in the white layer, which decreases the fatigue wear resistance. Under dry condition, the high hardness and grain refinement of the white layer increase the strength of the machined surface, thereby improving the adhesive wear resistance. The residual stress does not affect the wear resistance.

Keywords

hard cutting mechanical residual stress sliding friction wear resistance white layer 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 51375072); SCP (Grant Number JCKY2016212A506-0102).

References

  1. 1.
    X. Li and U. Olofsson, A Study on Friction and Wear Reduction Due to Porosity in Powder Metallurgic Gear Materials, Tribol. Int., 2017, 110, p 86–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.W. Gebretsadik, J. Hardell, and B. Prakash, Friction and Wear Characteristics of Different Pb-Free Bearing Materials in Mixed and Boundary Lubrication Regimes, Wear, 2015, 340, p 63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    X.M. Zhang, L. Chen, and H. Ding, Effects of Process Parameters on White Layer Formation and Morphology in Hard Turning of AISI52100 Steel, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 2016, 30(Supplement), p 1–6Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S.B. Hosseini, U. Klement, Y. Yao, and K. Ryttberg, Formation Mechanisms of White Layers Induced by Hard Turning of AISI, 52100 Steel, Acta Mater., 2015, 89, p 258–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F.Y. Zhang, C.Z. Duan, M.J. Wang, and W. Sun, White and Dark Layer Formation Mechanism in Hard Cutting of AISI52100 Steel, J. Manuf. Process., 2018, 32, p 878–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Jomaa, V. Songmene, and P. Bocher, An Investigation of Machining-Induced Residual Stresses and Microstructure of Induction-Hardened AISI, 4340 Steel, Mater. Manuf. Process., 2016, 31(7), p 838–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G.T.C. Ooi, S. Roy, and S. Sundararajan, Investigating the Effect of Retained Austenite and Residual Stress on Rolling Contact Fatigue of Carburized Steel with XFEM and Experimental Approaches, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2018, 732, p 311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Liu, G.Y. Tian, B. Gao, K. Zeng, and F. Qiu, Domain Wall Characterization inside Grain and around Grain Boundary under Tensile Stress, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2019, 471, p 39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Ramesh and S.N. Melkote, Modeling of White Layer Formation under Thermally Dominant Conditions in Orthogonal Machining of Hardened AISI, 52100 Steel, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, 2008, 48(3–4), p 402–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y.B. Guo, A.W. Warren, and F. Hashimoto, The Basic Relationships between Residual Stress, White Layer, and Fatigue Life of Hard Turned and Ground Surfaces in Rolling Contact, CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., 2010, 2(2), p 129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y.B. Guo and A.W. Warren, An Experimental Study on the Effect of Machining-Induced White Layer on Frictional and Wear Performance at Dry and Lubricated Sliding Contact, Tribol. Trans., 2010, 53(1), p 127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D.H. Cho, S.A. Lee, and Y.Z. Lee, Mechanical Properties and Wear Behavior of the White Layer, Tribol. Lett., 2012, 45(1), p 123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Y. Choi, Influence of a White Layer on the Performance of Hard Machined Surfaces in Rolling Contact, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B-J. Eng. Manuf., 2010, 224(B8), p 1207–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Z. Fang-yuan, D. Chun-zheng, X. Xin-xin, and W. Min-jie, Influence of Cutting Condition on White Layer Induced by High Speed Machining of Hardened Steel, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2018, 98(1–4), p 77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    C.Z. Duan, W. Sen Kong, Q.L. Hao, and F. Zhou, Modeling of White Layer Thickness in High Speed Machining of Hardened Steel Based on Phase Transformation Mechanism, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2013, 69(1–4), p 59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    F.Y. Zhang, C.Z. Duan, W. Sun, and K. Ju, Effects of Cutting Conditions on the Microstructure and Residual Stress of White and Dark Layers in Cutting Hardened Steel, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2019, 266, p 599–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Hua, R. Shivpuri, X. Cheng, V. Bedekar, Y. Matsumoto, F. Hashimoto, and T.R. Watkins, Effect of Feed Rate, Workpiece Hardness and Cutting Edge on Subsurface Residual Stress in the Hard Turning of Bearing Steel Using Chamfer + Hone Cutting Edge Geometry, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Wen and P. Huang, “Principles of Tribology,” John Wiley & Sons, 2012.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Jurenka and M. Spaniel, Advanced FE Model for Simulation of Pitting Crack Growth, Adv. Eng. Softw., 2014, 72(SI), p 218–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. Jisheng and D.T. Gawne, Wear Characteristics of Plasma-Nitrided CrMo Steel Under Mixed and Boundary Lubricated Conditions, J. Mater. Sci., 1997, 32(4), p 913–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Jisheng and D.T. Gawne, Effect of Thermochemical Treatments on the Sliding Wear Mechanisms of Steels under Boundary Lubrication, Tribol. Trans., 1999, 42(3), p 626–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    X. Han, Y. Hu, and S. Yu, Investigation of Material Removal Mechanism of Silicon Wafer in the Chemical Mechanical Polishing Process Using Molecular Dynamics Simulation Method, Appl. Phys. A, 2009, 95(3), p 899–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. Singh, R.K. Khatirkar, and S.G. Sapate, Microstructure Evolution and Abrasive Wear Behavior of D2 Steel, Wear, 2015, 328, p 206–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. Zhou, G. Liu, Z. Han, and K. Lu, Grain Size Effect on Wear Resistance of a Nanostructured AISI52100 Steel, Scr. Mater., 2008, 58(6), p 445–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Y. Shen, S.M. Moghadam, F. Sadeghi, K. Paulson, and R.W. Trice, Effect of Retained Austenite - Compressive Residual Stresses on Rolling Contact Fatigue Life of Carburized AISI, 8620 Steel, Int. J. Fatigue, 2015, 75, p 135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    X.D. Ren, Q.B. Zhan, H.M. Yang, F.Z. Dai, C.Y. Cui, G.F. Sun, and L. Ruan, The Effects of Residual Stress on Fatigue Behavior and Crack Propagation from Laser Shock Processing-Worked Hole, Mater. Des., 2013, 44, p 149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Novak, M. Kalin, P. Lukas, G. Anne, J. Vleugels, and O. Van der Biest, The Effect of Residual Stresses in Functionally Graded Alumina-ZTA Composites on Their Wear and Friction Behaviour, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2007, 27(1), p 151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    T. Hanlon, A.H. Chokshi, M. Manoharan, and S. Suresh, Effects of Grain Refinement and Strength on Friction and Damage Evolution under Repeated Sliding Contact in Nanostructured Metals, Int. J. Fatigue, 2005, p 1159–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    H.-K. Jun, J.-W. Seo, I.-S. Jeon, S.-H. Lee, and Y.-S. Chang, Fracture and Fatigue Crack Growth Analyses on a Weld-Repaired Railway Rail, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2016, 59, p 478–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Y.J. Cao, J.Q. Sun, F. Ma, Y.Y. Chen, X.Z. Cheng, X. Gao, and K. Xie, Effect of the Microstructure and Residual Stress on Tribological Behavior of Induction Hardened GCr15 Steel, Tribol. Int., 2017, 115, p 108–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    K. Fukaura, Y. Yokoyama, D. Yokoi, N. Tsujii, and K. Ono, Fatigue of Cold-Work Tool Steels: Effect of Heat Treatment and Carbide Morphology on Fatigue Crack Formation, Life, and Fracture Surface Observations, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2004, 35A(4), p 1289–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    B. Omidvar and A. Ghorbanpoor, The Role of Oil Seepage in Fatigue Crack Growth of Lubricated Wearing Systems, Eng. Fract. Mech., 1998, 60(2), p 239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    P. Sahoo and S.K.R. Chowdhury, A Fractal Analysis of Adhesive Wear at the Contact between Rough Solids, Wear, 2002, 253(PII S0043-1648(02)00243-09-10), p 924–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhang Fangyuan
    • 2
  • Duan Chunzheng
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sun Wei
    • 1
  • Ju Kang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina
  2. 2.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringNingbo UniversityNingboChina

Personalised recommendations