Advertisement

Fatigue of Surface-Treated Nickel-Based Superalloy at High Temperature

  • K. S. ChinEmail author
  • S. Idapalapati
  • D. T. Ardi
Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Nickel-based superalloy IN718 specimens were subjected to two surface treatments, namely shot peening (SP) and deep cold rolling (DCR) to investigate the effects of surface integrity (in particular residual stresses and cold work) on fatigue performance. Residual stress and cold work profiles of the different specimens were obtained using x-ray diffraction (XRD). Microhardness profiles were also obtained from the samples as a comparison against full width at half maximum (FWHM) from XRD in evaluation of cold work. Surface roughness effects were found to be insignificant, evident from the surface-initiated fatigue cracks in both SP and DCR specimens. Fatigue life improvements exhibited by SP and DCR specimens over the as-machined equivalent can be attributed to crack retardation due to work-hardened layer as well as compressive residual stresses.

Keywords

cold work fatigue nickel-based superalloys residual stress surface treatment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, and Advanced Remanufacturing and Technology Centre (ARTC), Singapore, for providing resources, facilities and financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    M.N. James, D.J. Hughes, Z. Chen, H. Lombard, D.G. Hattingh, D. Asquith, J.R. Yates, and P.J. Webster, Residual Stresses and Fatigue Performance, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2007, 14(2), p 384–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P.J. Withers and H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, Residual Stress. Part 2—Nature and Origins, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2001, 17(4), p 366–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Starker, H. Wohlfahrt, and E. Macherauch, Subsurface Crack Initiation During Fatigue as a Result of Residual Stresses, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1979, 1(3), p 319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y.K. Gao, M. Yao, P.G. Shao, and Y.H. Zhao, Another Mechanism for Fatigue Strength Improvement of Metallic Parts by Shot Peening, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2003, 12(5), p 507–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Shiozawa, Y. Morii, S. Nishino, and L. Lu, Subsurface Crack Initiation and Propagation Mechanism in High-Strength Steel in a Very High Cycle Fatigue Regime, Int. J. Fatigue, 2006, 28(11), p 1521–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. Altenberger, R.K. Nalla, U. Noster, B. Scholtes, and R.O. Ritchie, On the Fatigue Behavior and Associated Effect of Residual Stresses in Deep-Rolled and Laser Shock Peened Ti-6Al-4V Alloys at Ambient and Elevated Temperatures, HCF 2002: 7th National Turbine Engine High Cycle Fatigue Conference, 2002.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P.J. Withers, Residual Stress and Its Role in Failure, Rep. Prog. Phys., 2007, 70(12), p 2211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.E. Hack and G.R. Leverant, Influence of Compressive Residual Stress on the Crack-Opening Behavior of Part-Through Fatigue Cracks, Residual Stress Effects in Fatigue, ASTM International, 1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E.P. DeGarmo, J.T. Black, R.A. Kohser, and B.E. Klamecki, Materials and Process in Manufacturing, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2003, p 383Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G.A. Webster and A.N. Ezeilo, Residual Stress Distributions and Their Influence on Fatigue Lifetimes, Int. J. Fatigue, 2001, 23, p 375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R.K. Nalla, I. Altenberger, U. Noster, G.Y. Liu, B. Scholtes, and R.O. Ritchie, On the Influence of Mechanical Surface Treatments—Deep Rolling and Laser Shock Peening—On the Fatigue Behavior of Ti–6Al–4 V at Ambient and Elevated Temperatures, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2003, 355(1), p 216–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.C. McClung, A Literature Survey on the Stability and Significance of Residual Stresses During Fatigue, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2007, 30(3), p 173–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P.S. Prevéy, The Effect of Cold Work on the Thermal Stability of Residual Compression in Surface Enhanced IN718, DTIC Document, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W.Z. Zhuang and G.R. Halford, Investigation of Residual Stress Relaxation Under Cyclic Load, Int. J. Fatigue, 2001, 23(5), p 31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Chen, H. John, J. Xu, J. Hawk, and X. Liu, Effects of Hammer Peening and Aging Treatment on Microstructure, Mechanical Properties and Corrosion Resistant of Oil-Grade Alloy, 2012, 718, p 609–614Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. Singh and M. Marya, Surface Modification of Oilfield Alloys by Ultrasonic Impact Peening: uNS N07718, N07716, G41400, and S17400, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2016, 25(1), p 338–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Prevéy, D. Hombach, and P. Mason, Thermal Residual Stress Relaxation and Distortion in Surface Enhanced Gas Turbine Engine Components, DTIC Document, 1998.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Kobayashi, T. Matsui, and Y. Murakami, Mechanism of Creation of Compressive Residual Stress by Shot Peening, Int. J. Fatigue, 1998, 20(5), p 351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    K.J. Marsh, Shot Peening: Techniques and Applications, Eng. Mater. Advis. Serv. Ltd. (United Kingdom), 1993, 1993, p 320Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R.L. Murthy and B. Kotiveerachari, Burnishing of Metallic Surfaces—A Review, Precis. Eng., 1981, 3(3), p 172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    L. Luca, S. Neagu-Ventzel, and I. Marinescu, Effects of Working Parameters on Surface Finish in Ball-Burnishing of Hardened Steels, Precis. Eng., 2005, 29(2), p 253–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    I. Altenberger, Deep Rolling—The Past, the Present and the Future, Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Shot Peen., 2005, p 144–155.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    P.S. Prevéy, The Measurement of Subsurface Residual Stress and Cold Work Distributions in Nickel Base Alloys, Residual Stress Des. Process Mater. Sel. WB Young, ed., ASME, Met. Park. OH, Citeseer, 1987, p 11–19.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    E.O. Ezugwu, Z.M. Wang, and A.R. Machado, The Machinability of Nickel-Based Alloys: A Review, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1999, 86(1–3), p 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    P.S. Prevéy and J.T. Cammett, The Effect of Shot Peening Coverage on Residual Stress, Cold Work and Fatigue in a Ni-Cr-Mo Low Alloy Steel, 8th Int. Conf. Shot Peen., 2002, p 1–7.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    T. Klotz, D. Delbergue, P. Bocher, M. Lévesque, and M. Brochu, Surface Characteristics and Fatigue Behavior of Shot Peened Inconel 718, Int. J. Fatigue, 2018, 110(October 2017), p 10–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    W.T. Becker and S. Lampman, Fracture Appearance and Mechanisms of Deformation and Fracture, Mater. Park. OH ASM Int., 2002, 2002, p 559–586Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Y. Mutoh, G.H. Fair, B. Noble, and R.B. Waterhouse, The Effect of Residual Stresses Induced by Shot Peening on Fatigue Crack Propagation in 2 High Strength Aluminium Alloys, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1987, 10(4), p 261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    J.T. Cammett, P.S. Prevéy, and N. Jayaraman, The Effect of Shot Peening Coverage on Residual Stress, Cold Work, and Fatigue in a Nickel-Base Superalloy, DTIC Document, 2005.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    H. Holzapfel, V. Schulze, O. Vöhringer, and E. Macherauch, Residual Stress Relaxation in an AISI, 4140 Steel Due to Quasistatic and Cyclic Loading at Higher Temperatures, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 1998, 248(1), p 9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    K.A. Soady, Life Assessment Methodologies Incoroporating Shot Peening Process Effects: Mechanistic Consideration of Residual Stresses and Strain Hardening Part 1—Effect of Shot Peening on Fatigue Resistance, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2013, 29(6), p 637–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    E. Hershko, N. Mandelker, G. Gheorghiu, H. Sheinkopf, I. Cohen, and O. Levy, Assessment of Fatigue Striation Counting Accuracy Using High Resolution Scanning Electron Microscope, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2008, 15(1–2), p 20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Y. Zong, P. Liu, B. Guo, and D. Shan, Investigation on High Temperature Short-Term Creep and Stress Relaxation of Titanium Alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2014, 620, p 172–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    R.K. Nalla, I. Altenberger, U. Noster, G.Y. Liu, B. Scholtes, and R.O. Ritchie, On the Influence of Mechanical Surface Treatments-Deep Rolling and Laser Shock Peening-on the Fatigue Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V at Ambient and Elevated Temperatures, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2003, 355(1–2), p 216–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    B.J. Foss, S. Gray, M.C. Hardy, S. Stekovic, D.S. McPhail, and B.A. Shollock, Analysis of Shot-Peening and Residual Stress Relaxation in the Nickel-Based Superalloy RR1000, Acta Mater., 2013, 61(7), p 2548–2559CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Advanced Remanufacturing and Technology CentreSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations