Implicit-Function-Based Design and Additive Manufacturing of Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

  • Yogesh TripathiEmail author
  • Mukul Shukla
  • Amba D. Bhatt


Regeneration or repairing an injured tissue using porous scaffolds, to rehabilitate the mechanical, biological and chemical actions, is one of the better options available, for tissue engineering and trauma cure. In this work, the nature-inspired gyroid architecture is selected for design of porous scaffolds. Implicit-function-based modeling is performed to understand the basic geometric characteristics of this complex architecture. A study on the effect of tuning the offset parameter (t) used in the gyroid equation, on the scaffold porosity and specific surface area, is carried out. Further, gyroid scaffolds with varying porosities and interconnected pores are modeled and subsequently manufactured using the fused deposition modeling (FDM) additive manufacturing (AM) technique, with polylactic acid (PLA) filaments. Results show that the function-based gyroid modeling is ideally suited for the design and AM of continuous porous scaffolds. Compression test is also conducted on AMed scaffolds to examine their load bearing ability. Tests reveal that the porous scaffolds have compressive strength equivalent of that of the human trabecular bone. Additionally, this study investigated in vitro, the cell viability of PLA gyroid scaffolds by measuring the cell proliferation after 48 and 72 h showing expected biocompatibility. In conclusion, the FDM manufactured gyroid scaffolds seem to be a viable alternative for bone tissue engineering applications.


additive manufacturing bone scaffolds compression behavior gyroid implicit surface modeling in vitro PLA 



We are thankful to the National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS) Pune, India, for providing access to the MTT assay testing facility. The lead author would like to thank the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), Government of India, for providing financial assistance as research fellowship.


  1. 1.
    R. Langer and P. Vacanti, Tissue Engineering, Science, 1993, 260(5110), p 920−926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Qu, H. Fu, Z. Han, and Y. Sun, Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: A Review, RSC Adv., 2019, 9, p 2625−26262Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.I. Mohhammed and I. Gibson, Design of Three-Dimensional, Triply Periodic Unit Cell Scaffold Structures for Additive Manufacturing, J. Mech. Des., 2018, 140(7), p 071701−071710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Wohlgemuth, N. Yufa, J. Hoffman, and E.L. Thomas, Triply Periodic Bicontinuous Cubic Microdomain Morphologies by Symmetries, Macromolecules, 2001, 34(7), p 6083−6089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Q. Li, Q. Hong, Q. Qi, X. Ma, X. Han, and J. Tian, Towards Additive Manufacturing Oriented Geometric Modeling Using Implicit Functions, Vis. Comput. Ind. Biomed. Art, 2018, 1(1), p 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O. Al Ketan, A. Soliman, A.M. AlQubaisi, and R.K.A. Al-Rub, Nature-Inspired Lightweight Cellular Co-continuous Composites with Architected Periodic Gyroidal Structures, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2017, 20(2), p 1700594Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Rajagopalan and R.A. Robb, Schwarz meets Schwann: Design and Fabrication of Biomorphic and Durataxic Tissue Engineering Scaffolds, Med. Image Anal., 2006, 10(5), p 693−712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Yanez, A. Cuadrado, O. Martel, H. Afonso, and D. Monopoli, Gyroid Porous Titanium Porous Structures: A versatile Solution to be used as Scaffolds in Bone Defect Reconstruction, Mater. Des., 2018, 140, p 21−29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Yuan, S. Ding, and C. Wen, Additive Manufacturing Technology for porous Metal Implant Applications and Triple Minimal Surface Structures: A Review, Bioact. Mater., 2019, 4(1), p 56−70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F.P. Melchels, A.M. Barradas, B.C.A. Van, B.J. De, J. Feijen, and D.W. Grijpma, Effects of the Architecture of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds on Cell Seeding and Culturing, Acta Biomater., 2010, 6(11), p 4208−4217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F.P. Melchels, K. Bertoldi, R. Gabbrielli, R.H. Velders, J. Feijen, and D.W. Grijpma, Mathematically Defined Tissue Engineering Scaffold Architectures Prepared by Stereolithography, Biomaterials, 2010, 31(27), p 6909−6916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Afshar, P. Anaraki, H. Montazerian, and J. Kadkhodapour, Additive Manufacturing and Mechanical Characterization of Graded Porosity Scaffolds Designed Based on Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Architectures, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2016, 62, p 481−494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A.M. Abou- Ali, O. Al-Ketan, R. Rowshan, and R.A. Al- Rub, Mechanical Response of 3D Printed Bending-Dominated Ligament-Based Triply Periodic Cellular Polymeric Solids, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28(4), p 2316−2326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Michielsen and D.G. Stavenga, Gyroid Cuticular Structures in Butterfly Wing Scales: Biological Photonic Crystals, J. R. Soc. Interface, 2008, 5(18), p 85−94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Saho, X. Ke, A. Liu, M. Sun, Y. He, X. Yang, J. Fu, Y. Liu, L. Zhang, G. Yang, S. Xu, and Z. Gou, Bone Regeneration in 3D Printing Bioactive Ceramic Scaffolds with Improved Tissue/Material Interface Pore Architecture in Thin-Wall Bone Defect, Biofabrication, 2017, 9(2), p 025003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. Song, C. Hu, X. Pei, J. Sun, H. Sun, L. Wu, Q. Jiang, H. Fan, B. Yang, C. Zhou, Y. Fan, and X. Zhang, Dual Modulation on Crystallinity and Macro/Microstructures of 3D Printed Porous Titanium Implants to Enhance the Stability and Osseointegration, J. Mat. Chem. B, 2019, 7, p 2865−2877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. Zhanga, X. Peia, P. Songb, H. Suna, H. Lia, Y. Fana, Q. Jianga, C. Zhoua, and X. Zhanga, Porous Bioceramics Produced by Inkjet 3D Printing: Effect of Printing Ink Formulation on the Ceramic Macro and Micro Porous Architecture Control, Compos Part B, 2018, 155, p 112−121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    X. Pei, L. Ma, B. Zhang, J. Sun, Y. Sun, Y. Fan, Z. Gou, C. Zhou, and X. Zhang, Creating Hierarchical Porosity Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds with Osteoinduction by Three-Dimensional Printing and Microwave Sintering, Biofacrication, 2017, 9(4), p 045008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Asadi-Eydivand, M. Solati-Hashjin, A. Farzad, and N.A. Osman, Effect of Technical Parameters on Porous Structure and Strength of 3D Printed Calcium Sulfate Prototypes, Robot CIM Int. Manuf., 2016, 37, p 57−67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    G.H. Wu and S.H. Hsu, Review: Polymeric-Based 3D Printing for Tissue Engineering, J. Med. Biol. Eng., 2015, 35(3), p 285−292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M.C. Wurm, T. Most, B. Bergauer, D. Rietzel, F.W. Neukam, S.C. Cifuentes, and C.V. Wilmowsky, In-Vitro Evaluation of Polylactic Acid (PLA) Manufactured by Fused Deposition Modelling, J. Bio. Eng., 2017, 11, p 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Gremare, V. Guduric, R. Bareille, V. Heroguez, S. Latour, N. L’heureux, J.-C. Fricain, S. Catros, and D.L. Nihouannen, Characterization of Printed PLA Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 2018, 106(4), p 887−894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Oftadeh, M. Perez-Viloria, J. Villa-Camacho, A. Vaziri, and A. Nazarian, Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Trabecular Bone: A Review, J. Biomech. Eng., 2015, 137(1), p 0108021−01080215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A.V. Rammohan, T. Lee, and V.B.C. Tan, A Novel Morphological Model of Trabecular Bone Based on the Gyroid, Int. J. App. Mech., 2015, 7(3), p 1550048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    S.M. Giannitelli, D. Accoto, M. Trombetta, and A. Rainer, Current Trends in the Design of Scaffolds for Computer-Aided Tissue Engineering, Acta Biomater., 2014, 10(2), p 580−594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26. Accessed 22 Apr 2019
  27. 27. Accessed 22 Apr 2019
  28. 28.
    L.S. Nair and C.T. Laurencin, Polymers as Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering and Controlled Drug Delivery, Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol., 2006, 102, p 47−90Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    V. Mazzanti, L. Malagutti, and F. Mollica, FDM 3D Printing of Polymers Containing Natural Fillers: A Review of Their Mechanical Properties, Polymers, 2019, 11(7), p 1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    X. Chan, H. Fan, X. Deng, L. Wu, T. Yi, L. Gu, C. Zhou, Y. Fan, and X. Zhang, Scaffolds Structural Microenvironmental Cues to Guide Tissue Regeneration in Bone Tissue Applications, Nanomaterials, 2018, 8(11), p 960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    L.J. Gibson, Biomechanics of Cellular Solids, J. Biomech., 2005, 38(3), p 377−399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    V.S. Deshpande, M.F. Ashby, and N.A. Fleck, Foam Topology: Bending vs Stretching Dominated Architectures, Acta Mater., 2001, 49(6), p 1035−1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    D. Li, W. Liao, N. Dai, and Y.M. Xie, Comparison of Mechanical Properties and Energy Absorption of Sheet-Based and Strut-Based Gyroid Cellular Structures with Graded Densities, Materials, 2019, 12(13), p 2183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    D.W. Abueidda, M. Elhebeary, C.-S. Andrew Shiang, S. Pang, R.K.A. Al-Rub, and I.M. Jasiuk, Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Polymeric Gyroid Cellular Structure: Experimental and Finite Element Study, Mater. Des., 2019, 165, p 107597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    S. Sahmani, S. Saber-Samandari, M.M. Aghdam, and A. Khandan, Nonlinear Resonance Response of Porous Beam-Type Implants Corresponding to Various Morphology Shapes for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2018, 27, p 5370−5383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    I. Maskery, L. Sturm, A.O. Aremu, A. Panesar, C.B. Williams, C.J. Tuck, R.D. Wildman, I.A. Ashcroft, and R.J.M. Hague, Insights into the Mechanical Properties of several Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Lattice Structures made by Polymer Additive Manufacturing, Polymer, 2018, 52, p 62−71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    L.L. Hench, Bioceramics: From Concept to Clinic, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1991, 74, p 1487−1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMotilal Nehru National Institute of Technology AllahabadPrayagrajIndia

Personalised recommendations