Advertisement

Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 28, Issue 11, pp 6736–6745 | Cite as

Effects of Ultrasonic Surface Rolling Parameters on Surface Integrity of TC17 Alloy

  • Liang TanEmail author
  • Dinghua Zhang
  • Changfeng Yao
  • Junxue Ren
Article
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper was to investigate the effects of different static forces and feed speeds of ultrasonic surface rolling (USR) on the surface integrity of TC17 alloy. Surface roughness, in-depth residual stress, in-depth microhardness, and cross-sectional microstructure of the processed materials were measured and analyzed to get a comprehensive knowledge of the surface characteristics under different conditions. The results indicate that the specimens treated by USR achieve a considerable improvement in surface roughness (Ra 0.04-0.10 μm); meanwhile, the surface morphology is smooth and uniform. Moreover, the surface residual stress and microhardness are greatly improved compared to those of untreated specimen. The maximum compressive residual stress is approximately − 966 MPa at the depth of 300 μm, and the thickness of strengthened layer is about 1000 μm. The material of affected layer experiences plastic deformation in a certain extent. Moreover, the gradient change in microstructure and white layer are also observed on the subsurface layer. It is also concluded from the study that static force has a more significant impact on surface integrity characteristics compared with feed speed.

Keywords

microhardness distribution microstructure residual stress distribution surface roughness TC17 alloy ultrasonic surface rolling 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91860206 and 51875472), National Science and Technology Major Project of China (Grant No. 2017-VII-0001-0094), and the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Grant No. 2017JM5031).

References

  1. 1.
    X.H. Zhang, D.X. Liu, H.B. Tan, and X.F. Wang, Effect of TiN/Ti Composite Coating and Shot Peening on Fretting Fatigue Behavior of TC17 Alloy at 350 °C, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2009, 203(16), p 2315–2321Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.B. Jiao, C. Gao, L. Cheng, X.W. Li, and Y. Feng, A Very High-Cycle Fatigue Test and Fatigue Properties of TC17 Titanium Alloy, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2016, 25(3), p 1085–1093Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.T. Bozdana, On the Mechanical Surface Enhancement Techniques in Aerospace Industry-a Review of Technology, Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol., 2005, 77(4), p 279–292Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Moussaoui, M. Mousseigne, J. Senatore, and R. Chieragatti, The Effect of Roughness and Residual Stresses on Fatigue Life Time of an Alloy of Titanium, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2015, 78(1–4), p 557–563Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C.W. Huang, Y.Q. Zhao, S.W. Xin, C.S. Tan, W. Zhou, Q. Li, and W.D. Zeng, Effect of Microstructure on High Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Ti-5Al-5Mo-5 V-3Cr-1Zr Titanium Alloy, Int. J. Fatigue, 2017, 94, p 30–40Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y.G. Liu, H.M. Li, and M.Q. Li, Characterization of Surface Layer in TC17 Alloy Treated by Air Blast Shot Peening, Mater. Des., 2015, 65(65), p 120–126Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y.X. Geng, X.S. Mei, K.D. Wang, X. Dong, X. Yan, Z.J. Fan, W.Q. Duan, and W.J. Wang, Effect of Laser Shock Peening on Residual Stress, Microstructure and Hot Corrosion Behavior of Damage-Tolerant TC21 Titanium Alloy, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2018, 27(9), p 4703–4713Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C.C. Wong, A. Hartawan, and W.K. Teo, Deep Cold Rolling of Features on Aero-Engine Components, Proc. Cirp, 2014, 13, p 350–354Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Sequera, C.H. Fu, Y.B. Guo, and X.T. Wei, Surface Integrity of Inconel 718 by Ball Burnishing, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014, 23(9), p 3347–3353Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.K. Nalla, I. Altenberger, U. Noster, G.Y. Liu, B. Scholtes, and R.O. Ritchie, On the Influence of Mechanical Surface Treatments-Deep Rolling and Laser Shock Peening-on the Fatigue Behavior of Ti-6A-l4 V at Ambient and Elevated Temperatures, Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct., 2003, 355(1–2), p 216–230Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.S. Prevéy, N. Jayaraman, R.A. Ravindranath, and M. Shepard, Improved High Cycle Fatigue Damage Tolerance of Turbine Engine Compressor Components by Low Plasticity Burnishing (LPB), J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power, 2008, 130, p 1–5Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.T. Bozdana, N.N.Z. Gindy, and H. Li, Deep Cold Rolling with Ultrasonic Vibrations - a New Mechanical Surface Enhancement Technique, Int. J. Mach. Tool Manu., 2005, 45(6), p 713–718Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Ye, A. Telang, A.S. Gill, S. Suslov, Y. Idell, Z. Kai, J.M.K. Wiezorek, Z. Zhou, D. Qian, and S.R. Mannava, Gradient Nanostructure and Residual Stresses Induced by Ultrasonic Nano-crystal Surface Modification in 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel for High Strength and High Ductility, Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct., 2014, 613(11–12), p 274–288Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A.T. Bozdana and N.N.Z. Gindy, Comparative Experimental Study on Effects of Conventional and Ultrasonic Deep Cold Rolling Processes on Ti-6Al-4 V, Mater. Sci. Technol. Lond., 2008, 24(11), p 1378–1384Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H.B. Wang, G.L. Song, and G.Y. Tang, Evolution of Surface Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Ti-6Al-4 V Alloy Induced by Electropulsing-Assisted Ultrasonic Surface Rolling Process, J. Alloy. Compd., 2016, 681, p 146–156Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y.D. Ye, H.B. Wang, G.Y. Tang, and G.L. Song, Effect of Electropulsing-Assisted Ultrasonic Nanocrystalline Surface Modification on the Surface Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Ti-6Al-4 V Alloy, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2018, 27(5), p 2394–2403Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Wang, D.P. Wang, G. Liu, B.M. Gong, and N.X. Song, Investigations on the Nanocrystallization of 40Cr Using Ultrasonic Surface Rolling Processing, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2008, 255(5), p 1824–1829Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y. Liu, L.J. Wang, and D.P. Wang, Finite Element Modeling of Ultrasonic Surface Rolling Process, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2011, 211(12), p 2106–2113Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Y. Liu, X. Zhao, and D.P. Wang, Effective FE Model to Predict Surface Layer Characteristics of Ultrasonic Surface Rolling With Experimental Validation, Mater. Sci. Technol. Lond., 2014, 30(6), p 627–636Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.F. Xie, Y.L. Zhu, Y.L. Huang, C. Bai, and X.L. Ye, Microstructure Characteristics of 30CrMnSiNi2A Steel After Ultrasound-Aided Deep Rolling, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2013, 22(6), p 1642–1648Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    X.J. Cao, Y.S. Pyoun, and R. Murakami, Fatigue Properties of A S45C Steel Subjected to Ultrasonic Nanocrystal Surface Modification, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2010, 256(21), p 6297–6303Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Y.L. Zhu, K. Wang, L. Li, and Y.L. Huang, Evaluation of an Ultrasound-Aided Deep Rolling Process for Anti-Fatigue Applications, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2009, 18, p 1036–1040Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A.I. Dekhtyar, B.N. Mordyuk, D.G. Savvakin, V.I. Bondarchuk, I.V. Moiseeva, and N.I. Khripta, Enhanced Fatigue Behavior of Powder Metallurgy Ti-6Al-4 V Alloy by Applying Ultrasonic Impact Treatment, Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct., 2015, 641, p 348–359Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. Li, S.G. Qu, Y.X. Pan, and X.Q. Li, Effects of the Different Frequencies and Loads of Ultrasonic Surface Rolling on Surface Mechanical Properties and Fretting Wear Resistance of HIP Ti-6Al-4 V Alloy, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2016, 389, p 324–334Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M.L. Cheng, D.Y. Zhang, H.W. Chen, W. Qin, and J.S. Li, Surface Nanocrystallization and its Effect on Fatigue Performance of High-Strength Materials Treated by Ultrasonic Rolling Process, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2016, 83(1), p 123–131Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    X.H. Zhao, G.L. Xue, and Y. Liu, Gradient Crystalline Structure Induced by Ultrasonic Impacting and Rolling and its Effect on Fatigue Behavior of TC11 Titanium Alloy, Results Phys., 2017, 7, p 1845–1851Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    E. Maawad, H.G. Brokmeier, L. Wagner, Y. Sano, and Ch Genzel, Investigation on the Surface and Near-Surface Characteristics of Ti-2.5Cu After Various Mechanical Surface Treatments, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2011, 205(12), p 3644–3650Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    L. Wagner, M. Mhaede, M. Wollmann, I. Altenberger, and Y. Sano, Surface Layer Properties and Fatigue Behavior in Al 7075-T73 and Ti-6Al-4 V: Comparing Results after Laser Peening; Shot Peening and Ball-Burnishing, Int. J. Struct. Integr., 2011, 2(2), p 185–199Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    I. Altenberger, R.K. Nalla, Y. Sano, L. Wagner, and R.O. Ritchie, On the Effect of Deep-Rolling and Laser-Peening on the Stress-Controlled Low- and High-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Ti-6Al-4 V at Elevated Temperatures up to 550°C, Int. J. Fatigue, 2012, 44, p 292–302Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    D.X. Wu, C.F. Yao, and D.H. Zhang, Surface Characterization and Fatigue Evaluation in GH4169 Superalloy: Comparing Results after Finish Turning; Shot Peening and Surface Polishing Treatments, Int. J. Fatigue, 2018, 113, p 222–235Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    D. Arola and C.L. Williams, Estimating the Fatigue Stress Concentration Factor of Machined Surfaces, Int. J. Fatigue, 2002, 24(9), p 923–930Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    D.X. Wu, C.D. Yao, and D.H. Zhang, Surface Characterization of Ti1023 Alloy Shot Peened by Cast Steel and Ceramic Shot, Adv. Mech. Eng., 2017, 9(10), p 1–14Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Q.J. Zhang, J.G. Cao, and H.Y. Wang, Ultrasonic Surface Strengthening of Train Axle Material 30CrMoA, Proc. Cirp, 2016, 42, p 853–857Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    C.F. Yao, L. Tan, P. Yang, and D.H. Zhang, Effects of Tool Orientation and Surface Curvature on Surface Integrity in Ball End Milling of TC17, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., 2018, 94(5–8), p 1699–1710Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Y. Liu, X.H. Zhao, and D.P. Wang, Determination of the Plastic Properties of Materials Treated by Ultrasonic Surface Rolling Process Through Instrumented Indentation, Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct., 2014, 600, p 21–31Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    L. Tan, C.F. Yao, D.H. Zhang, and J.X. Ren, Empirical Modeling of Compressive Residual Stress Profile in Shot Peening TC17 Alloy Using Characteristic Parameters and Sinusoidal Decay Function, P. I. Mech. Eng. B-J. Eng., 2018, 232(5), p 855–866Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    K.A. Darling, M.A. Tschopp, A.J. Roberts, J.P. Ligda, and L.J. Kecskes, Enhancing Grain Refinement in Polycrystalline Materials Using Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment at Cryogenic Temperatures, Scripta Mater., 2013, 69(6), p 461–464Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    J.S. Li, W.D. Gao, Y. Cao, Z.W. Huang, B. Gao, Q.Z. Mao, and Y.S. Li, Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of a Gradient Nanostructured 316L Stainless Steel Processed by Rotationally Accelerated Shot Peening, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2018, 20, p 1800402Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Y.S. Li, L.Z. Li, J.F. Nie, Y. Cao, Y.H. Zhao, and Y.T. Zhu, Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical Properties of a 5052 Al Alloy with Gradient Structures, J. Mater. Res., 2017, 32, p 4443Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    A. Amanov, I.S. Cho, D.E. Kim, and Y.S. Pyun, Fretting Wear and Friction Reduction of CP Titanium And Ti-6Al-4V Alloy by Ultrasonic Nanocrystalline Surface Modification, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2012, 207(21), p 135–142Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    J.P. Nobre, A.C. Batista, L. Coelho, and A.M. Dias, Two Experimental Methods to Determining Stress-Strain Behavior of Work-Hardened Surface Layers of Metallic Components, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2010, 210(15), p 2285–2291Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    G. Liu, J. Lu, and K. Lu, Surface Nanocrystallization of 316L Stainless Steel Induced by Ultrasonic Shot Peening, Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct., 2000, 286, p 91–95Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Y.B. Guo and D.W. Schwach, An Experimental Investigation of White Layer on Rolling Contact Fatigue Using Acoustic Emission Technique, Int. J. Fatigue, 2005, 27(9), p 1051–1061Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liang Tan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dinghua Zhang
    • 1
  • Changfeng Yao
    • 1
  • Junxue Ren
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of High Performance Manufacturing for Aero Engine (Northwestern Polytechnical University)Ministry of Industry and Information TechnologyXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations