Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 1612–1617 | Cite as

Nonlinear Creep Deformation of Polycarbonate at High Stress Level: Experimental Investigation and Finite Element Modeling

  • Daiki Ikeshima
  • Akihiro Matsuzaki
  • Takumi Nagakura
  • Kanako Emori
  • Akio YonezuEmail author


It is well known that polycarbonate (PC) undergoes time-dependent deformation (i.e., creep deformation), and nonlinear creep deformation is often experienced at high stress level. Using the time–temperature–stress superposition principle (TTSSP), we obtain a new master curve, which covers higher stress level, and successfully establish a new modeling method of creep deformation of PC. First, to investigate the effect of applied stress level on the creep compliance (i.e., stress-dependent nonlinear creep deformation), this study conducted various creep tests with eight different stress levels. We found that the creep compliance curve strongly depended on the applied stress level; in particular, a higher stress level induced a larger difference in creep compliance. According to the TTSSP, the creep compliance curve at each stress level shifts with the creep time (i.e., stress reduced time). When we appropriately selected the stress reduced time, we obtained the master curve of creep compliance, which is unified with respect to various applied stresses. However, we found that the stress-shifted factor is not compliant with the previous TTSSP, especially in the higher stress regime. Therefore, this regime was also considered to obtain a new master curve that can cover a wide range of stress levels. Finally, our established creep model (master curve and stress shift factor) was introduced into FEM, and then this numerical model was verified by comparison with experimental data. Our model may be useful for predicting the creep deformation of PC subjected to a wide range of applied stresses.


finite element method nonlinear creep deformation behavior polycarbonate stress shift factor time–stress superposition principle 



This work is supported by the JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No. 17K06062) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and by a research grant from the Suga Weathering Technology Foundation (SWTF) (No. 67).


  1. 1.
    Z.N. Yin and T.J. Wang, Deformation Response and Constitutive Modeling of PC, ABS and PC/ABS Alloys Under Impact Tensile Loading, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2010, 527, p 1461–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Cao, X. Ma, B. Zhang et al., Tensile Behavior of Polycarbonate Over a Wide Range of Strain Rates, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2010, 527, p 4056–4061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Ito, Y. Masuda, and K. Nagai, Evaluation of Long-Term Stability and Degradation on Polycarbonate Based Plastic Glass, J. Polym. Eng., 2014, 35, p 31–40Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Sakai and S. Somiya, Analysis of Creep Behavior in Thermoplastics Based on Visco-Elastic Theory, Mech. Time-Depend. Mater., 2011, 15, p 293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.L. Williams, R.F. Landel, and J.D. Ferry, The Temperature Dependence of Relaxation Mechanisms in Amorphous Polymers and Other Glass-forming Liquids, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1955, 77, p 3701–3707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. An, R. Selvaraj, S. Hong, and N. Kim, Creep Behavior of ABS Polymer in Temperature-Humidity Conditions, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2017, 26, p 2754–2762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Bozorg-Haddad and M. Iskander, Comparison of Accelerated Compressive Creep Behavior of Virgin HDPE Using Thermal and Energy Approaches, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2011, 20, p 1219–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L.C.E. Struik, Physical aging in amorphous polymers and other materials, Elsevier, London, 1978Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Cangialosi, H. Schut, Veen Av, and S.J. Picken, Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy for Measuring Free Volume during Physical Aging of Polycarbonate, Macromolecules, 2003, 36, p 142–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Xu, Z. Yue, and X. Chen, Analysis of Damage During Bending Creep Tests, Philos. Mag. Lett., 2009, 89, p 335–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Luo, C. Wang, R. Zhao et al., Creep Behavior of Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) with Growing Damage, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2008, 483–484, p 580–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G.U. Losi and W.G. Knauss, Free Volume Theory and Nonlinear Thermoviscoelasticity, Polym. Eng. Sci., 1992, 32, p 542–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W.G. Knauss and I. Emri, Volume Change and Nonlinearly Thermo-Viscoelasticity Constitution of Polymers, Polym. Eng. Sci., 1987, 27, p 86–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P.A.O. Connel and G.B. McKenna, Large Deformation Response of Polycarbonate: Time-Temperature, Time-Aging Time, and Time-Strain Superposition, Polym. Eng. Sci., 1997, 37, p 1485–1495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. Bernstein and A. Shokooh, The Stress Clock Function in Viscoelasticity, J. Rheol., 1980, 24, p 189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Lai and A. Bakker, Analysis of the Non-linear Creep of Highdensity Polyethylene, Polymer, 1995, 36, p 93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    W. Luo, T. Yang, and Q. An, Time-Temperature-Stress Equivalence and Its Application to Nonlinear Viscoelastic Materials, Acta Mech. Solida Sin., 2001, 14, p 195–199Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Jazouli, W. Luo, F. Bremand, and T. Vu-Khanh, Application of Time-Stress Equivalence to Nonlinear Creep of Polycarbonate, Polym. Test., 2005, 24, p 463–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Kichenin, K.D. Van, and K. Boytard, Finite-Element Simulation of a New Two-Dissipative Mechanisms Model for Bulk Medium-Density Polyethylene, J. Mater. Sci., 1996, 31, p 1653–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Lu, B. Wang, J. Ma et al., Measurement of Creep Compliance of Solid Polymers by Nanoindentation, Mech. Time Depend. Mater., 2003, 7, p 189–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Seltzer and Y.-W. Mai, Depth Sensing Indentation of Linear Viscoelastic-Plastic: A Simple Method to Determine Creep Compliance, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2008, 75, p 4852–4862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    W. Luo, C. Wang, X. Hu, and T. Yang, Long-Term Creep Assessment of Viscoelastic Polymer by Time-Temperature-Stress Superposition, Acta Mech. Solida Sin., 2012, 25, p 571–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R.A. Schapery, On the Characterization of Nonlinear Viscoelastic Materials, Polym. Eng. Sci., 1969, 4, p 295–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    S.C. Yen and F.L. Williamson, Accelerated Characterization of Creep Response of an Off-Axis Composite Material, Compos. Sci. Technol., 1990, 38, p 103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    W. Brostow, Time-Stress Correspondence in Viscoelastic Materials: An Equation for the Stress and Temperature Shift Factor, Mater. Res. Innov., 2000, 3, p 347–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    W.J. MacKnight and J.J. Aklonis, Introduction to Polymer Viscoelasticity, Vol 2, Wiley-Interscience Publication, London, 1983Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    N. Inoue, A. Yonezu, Y. Watanabe et al., Prediction of Asymmetric Yield Strengths of Polymeric Materials at Tension and Compression Using Spherical Indentation, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 2017, 139, p 0210021–02100211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    H. Zamanian, B. Marzban, P. Bagheri, and M. Gudarzi, On Stress Concentration Factor for Randomly Oriented Discontinuous Fiber Laminas with Circular/Square Hole, J. Sci. Eng., 2013, 3, p 7–18Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    S.P. Zaoutsos, G.C. Papanicolaou, and A.H. Carbon, on the Non-Linear Viscoelastic Behaviour of Polymer-Matrix Composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 1998, 58, p 883–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    A.M. Vinogradov, V.H. Schmidt, G.F. Tuthill, and W.G. Bohannan, Damping and Electromechanical Energy Losses in the Piezoelectric Polymer PVDF, Mech. Mater., 2004, 36, p 1007–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    D. Ikeshima, A. Yonezu, and L. Liu, Molecular Origins of Elastoplastic Behavior of Polycarbonate Under Tension: A Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Approach, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2018, 145, p 306–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Y. Higuchi and M. Kubo, Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Simulation of the Void Growth Process in the Block Structure of Semicrystalline Polymers, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2016, 24, p 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    K. Hagita, H. Morita, and H. Takano, Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study of a Fracture of Filler-Filled Polymer Nanocomposites, Polymer, 2016, 99, p 368–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    MSCsoftware. Marc® 2012 Volume D: User Subroutines and Special Routines.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    M. Fukuhara and A. Sampei, Low-Temperature Elastic Moduli and Dilational and Shear Internal Friction of Polycarbonate, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 1996, 35, p 3218–3221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daiki Ikeshima
    • 1
  • Akihiro Matsuzaki
    • 1
  • Takumi Nagakura
    • 1
  • Kanako Emori
    • 1
  • Akio Yonezu
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Precision MechanicsChuo UniversityBunkyoJapan

Personalised recommendations