Constitutive Modeling for Hot Deformation Behavior of Al-5083 + SiC Composite

  • Amitava RudraEmail author
  • Satyabrata Das
  • Rupa Dasgupta


In the present research, isothermal hot deformation behavior of aluminum 5083 alloy + 15 (wt.%) SiC composite was obtained through compression test on INSTRON 8801 universal tensile testing machine (UTM) under a wide temperature range of 473-773 K and strain rate range of 0.01-10 s−1. The experimental true stress–strain data were employed to establish constitutive equations based on modified Johnson–Cook (JC) model and modified Zerilli–Armstrong (ZA) model to predict the hot flow behavior of the composite. The flow stress values obtained from these two models were plotted against the experimental flow curves to check the accuracy of these models. Suitability of the models was evaluated by comparing correlation coefficient (R), average absolute relative error and relative errors of prediction. The results show that the hot flow stresses of the present material depend on temperature and strain rate significantly. Both the models give good description of the hot deformation behavior of the composite. The prediction accuracy is found to be higher for modified ZA model compared to modified JC model, though the number of materials constants involved and time needed to evaluate them to establish the model are lower for modified JC model.


aluminum 5083 composite constitutive equation flow stress hot deformation Johnson–Cook model Zerilli–Armstrong model 



The authors sincerely thank Director, CSIR-AMPRI, Bhopal, for providing experimental facilities and giving permission for publishing this work. The corresponding author wants to thank CSIR, India, and AcSIR-AMPRI, Bhopal, for providing the fellowship and support, respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    T. Murai, S.-I. Matsuoka, S. Miyamoto, and Y. Oki, Effects of Extrusion Conditions on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of AZ31B Magnesium Alloy Extrusions, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2003, 141, p 207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.-L. Hu, Z.-S. Ji, and X.-Y. Chen, Effect of Extrusion Ratio on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of AZ91D Magnesium Alloy Recycled from Scraps by Hot Extrusion, Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China, 2010, 20, p 987–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ü. Cöcen and K. Önel, Ductility and Strength of Extruded SiCp/Aluminium-Alloy Composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2002, 62, p 275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    İ. Özdemir, Ü. Cöcen, and K. Önel, The Effect of Forging on the Properties of Particulate-SiC-Reinforced Aluminium-Alloy Composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2000, 60, p 411–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    O. Sabokpa, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, H. Abedi, and N. Haghdadi, Artificial Neural Network Modeling to Predict the High Temperature Flow Behavior of an AZ81 Magnesium Alloy, Mater. Des., 2012, 39, p 390–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Rao, Y. Prasad, and K. Suresh, Materials Modeling and Simulation of Isothermal Forging of Rolled AZ31B Magnesium Alloy: Anisotropy of Flow, Mater. Des., 2011, 32, p 2545–2553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Changizian, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, and A.A. Roostaei, The High Temperature Flow Behavior Modeling of AZ81 Magnesium Alloy Considering Strain Effects, Mater. Des., 2012, 39, p 384–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Chen, G. Zhao, J. Yu, W. Zhang, and T. Wu, Analysis and Porthole Die Design for a Multi-hole Extrusion Process of a Hollow, Thin-Walled Aluminum Profile, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2014, 74, p 383–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Bontcheva, G. Petzov, and L. Parashkevova, Thermomechanical Modelling of Hot Extrusion of Al-Alloys, Followed by Cooling on the Press, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2006, 38, p 83–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y.-J. Qin, Q.-L. Pan, Y.-B. He, W.-B. Li, X.-Y. Liu, and X. Fan, Modeling of Flow Stress for Magnesium Alloy During Hot Deformation, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, 527, p 2790–2797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Mandal, V. Rakesh, P. Sivaprasad, S. Venugopal, and K. Kasiviswanathan, Constitutive Equations to Predict High Temperature Flow Stress in a Ti-Modified Austenitic Stainless steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, 500, p 114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. Lin and X.-M. Chen, A Critical Review of Experimental Results and Constitutive Descriptions for Metals and Alloys in Hot Working, Mater. Des., 2011, 32, p 1733–1759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Song, J. Ning, X. Mao, and H. Tang, A modified Johnson–Cook model for Titanium Matrix Composites Reinforced with Titanium Carbide Particles at Elevated Temperatures, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2013, 576, p 280–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Varol, A. Canakci, and S. Ozsahin, Artificial Neural Network Modeling to Effect of Reinforcement Properties on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Al2024–B4C Composites Produced by Powder Metallurgy, Compos. B Eng., 2013, 54, p 224–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. Senthilkumar, A. Balaji, and D. Arulkirubakaran, Application of Constitutive And Neural Network Models for Prediction of High Temperature Flow Behavior of Al/Mg based nanocomposite, Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China, 2013, 23, p 1737–1750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. Chen, G. Zhao, and J. Yu, Hot Deformation Behavior and Constitutive Modeling of Homogenized 6026 Aluminum Alloy, Mater. Des., 2015, 74, p 25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y. Prasad and K. Rao, Processing Maps and Rate Controlling Mechanisms of Hot Deformation of Electrolytic Tough Pitch Copper in the Temperature Range 300–950°C, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, 391, p 141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y. Prasad, Recent Advances in the Science of Mechanical Processing, Indian J. Technol., 1990, 28, p 435–451Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Goswami, G. Spanos, P. Pao, and R. Holtz, Precipitation Behavior of the ß Phase in Al-5083, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, 527, p 1089–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Y. Prasad and T. Seshacharyulu, Modelling of Hot Deformation for Microstructural Control, Int. Mater. Rev., 1998, 43, p 243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    V. Senthilkumar, A. Balaji, and R. Narayanasamy, Analysis of Hot Deformation Behavior of Al 5083–TiC Nanocomposite Using Constitutive and Dynamic Material Models, Mater. Des., 2012, 37, p 102–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Y. Lin, X.-M. Chen, and G. Liu, A Modified Johnson–Cook Model for Tensile Behaviors of Typical High-Strength Alloy Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, 527, p 6980–6986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. Samantaray, S. Mandal, U. Borah, A. Bhaduri, and P. Sivaprasad, A Thermo-Viscoplastic Constitutive Model to Predict Elevated-Temperature Flow Behavior in a Titanium-Modified Austenitic Stainless Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, 526, p 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. Vedani, E. Gariboldi, and F. D’Errico. Hot Workability and Processing Maps of Aluminium Based Discontinuously Reinforced Composites. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2002, 18, p 507–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amitava Rudra
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Satyabrata Das
    • 3
  • Rupa Dasgupta
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR)BhopalIndia
  2. 2.CSIR-Advanced Materials and Processes Research InstituteBhopalIndia
  3. 3.Ex-CSIR-Advanced Materials and Processes Research InstituteBhopalIndia

Personalised recommendations