Micromechanical Modeling and Investigating the Effect of Particle Size and the Interface of Phases on the Mechanical Behavior of Dual-Phase Steels

  • Alireza Fallahi ArezodarEmail author
  • Ali Nikbakht


Dual-phase (DP) ferrite–martensite steels have a fine microstructure that consist of martensite islands, dispersed in a ferrite matrix. In the present work, a micromechanical-based finite element (FE) analysis is carried out in order to investigate the mechanical properties of this type of steels, such as yield stress and tensile strength. The step forward contribution of the present study is to insert the effect of the presence of the interface of the constituting phases in the FE model. In order to do so, a micromechanical FE model is developed in which the effect of the interface of the constituting phases is taken into account by means of cohesive elements. The required parameters of the cohesive elements are determined by a trial and error procedure which compares the numerical results to the experimental ones. Experimental data is used to verify the created FE model. This model is then used to investigate the effect of martensite volume fraction and small-to-large particle size ratio of martensite on the deformation behavior of the DP steel. This study shows that considering the interface of the constituting phases greatly affects the numerical results on stress and strain distributions and produces more realistic findings in agreement with experiments. The results show that applying cohesive elements between two phases have reduced tensile strength, yield stress, and the amount of uniform elongation.


cohesive zone elements dual-phase steel ferrite martensite micromechanical modeling 


Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    M.S. Rashid, GM 980X-A Unique High Strength sheet steel with Superior Formability. SAE Technical Paper No. 760206, p 938–949 (1976).
  2. 2.
    A. Fallahi, Microstructure-Properties Correlation of Dual Phase Steels Produced by Controlled Rolling Process, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2002, 18, p 451–454Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Calcagnotto, Y. Adachi, D. Ponge, and D. Raabe, Deformation and Fracture Mechanisms in Fine-and Ultrafine-Grained Ferrite/Martensite Dual-Phase Steels and the Effect of Aging, Acta Mater., 2011, 59, p 658–670. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.P. Shen, T.C. Lei, and J.Z. Liu, Microscopic Deformation Behavior of Martensitic-Ferritic Dual-Phase Steels, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 1986, 2, p 28–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F.M. Al-Abbasi and J.A. Nemes, Micromechanical Modeling of the Effect of Particle Size Difference in Dual Phase Steels, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2003, 40, p 3379–3391. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    F.M. Al-Abbasi and J.A. Nemes, Micromechanical Modeling of Dual Phase Steels, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2003, 45, p 1449–1465. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F.M. Al-Abbasi and James A. Nemes, Characterizing DP-Steels Using Micromechanical Modeling of Cells, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2007, 39, p 402–415. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Uthaisangsuk, U. Prahl, and W. Bleck, Failure Modeling of Multiphase Steels Using Representative Volume Elements Based on Real Microstructures, Proc. Eng., 2009, 1, p 171–176. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G.I. Barenblatt, The Formation of Equilibrium Cracks During Brittle Fracture: General Ideas and Hypothesis, Axially Symmetric Cracks, J. Appl. Math. Mech., 1959, 23, p 622–636. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.S. Dugdale, Yielding of Steel Sheets Containing Slits, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1960, 8, p 100–104. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. Tvergaard and J.W. Hutchinson, The Relation Between Crack Growth Resistance and Fracture Process Parameters in Elastic-Plastic Solids, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1992, 40, p 1377–1397. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    X.-P. Xu and A. Needleman, Numerical Simulations of Fast Crack Growth in Brittle Solids, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1994, 42, p 13971434. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    G.T. Camacho and M. Ortiz, Computational Modeling of Impact Damage in Brittle Materials, Int. J. Solids Struct., 1996, 33, p 2899–2938. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Hosseini-Toudeshky, B. Anbarlooie, and J. Kadkhodapour, Micromechanics Stress–Strain Behavior Prediction of Dual Phase Steel Considering Plasticity and Grain Boundaries Debonding, Mater. Des., 2015, 68, p 167–176. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Khamedi, A. Fallahi, and H. Zoghi, The Influence of Morphology and Volume Fraction of Martensite on AE Signals During Tensile Loading of Dual-Phase Steels, Int. J. Recent Trends Eng. Technol., 2009, 1, p 30–34Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Kuang, Y. Kang, H. Yu, and R. Liu, Stress–Strain Partitioning Analysis of Constituent Phases in Dual Phase Steel Based on the Modified Law of Mixture, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2009, 16, p 393–398. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Fallahi, E. Lak, and A. Nikbakht, Investigating the effect of the interface in numerical calculation of mechanical behavior of dual phase steels by using micromechanical modeling cells. The Bi-Annual International Conference on Experimental Solid Mechanics and Dynamics, Tehran, Iran, 2014Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. Lak, A. Fallahi, and A. Nikbakht, Predicting the deformation behavior of dual phase steels using micromechanical modeling of cell. The 22nd Annual International Conference on Mechanical Engineering (ISME), Ahvaz, Iran, 2014Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H.W. Reinhardt and H.A.W. Cornelissen, Post-Peak Cyclic Behaviour of Concrete in Uniaxial and Alternating Tensile and Compressive Loading, Cem. Concr. Res., 1984, 14, p 263–270. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.W. Hutchinson and A.G. Evans, Mechanics of Materials: Top-Down Approaches to Fracture, Acta Mater., 2000, 48, p 125–135. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    N. Chandra, H. Li, C. Shet, and H. Ghonem, Some Issues in the Application of Cohesive Zone Models for Metal-Ceramic Interfaces, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2002, 39, p 2827–2855. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. Tasan, M. Diehl, D. Yan, M. Bechtold, F. Roters, L. Schemmann, C. Zheng, N. Peranio, D. Ponge, M. Koyama, K. Tsuzaki, and D. Raabe, An Overview of Dual-Phase Steels: Advances in Microstructure-Oriented Processing and Micromechanically Guided Design, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 2015, 45, p 391–431. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Khamedi, A. Fallahi, and A. Refahi Oskouei, Effect of Martensite Phase Volume Fraction on Acoustic Emission Signals Using Wavelet Packet Analysis During Tensile Loading of Dual Phase Steels, Mater. Des., 2010, 31, p 2752–2759. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Fallahi, R. Khamedi, G. Minak, and A. Zucchelli, Monitoring of the Deformation and Fracture Process of Dual Phase Steels Employing Acoustic Emission Techniques, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 548, p 183–188. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. Alaie, S. Ziaei Rad, J. Kadkhodapour, M. Jafari, M. Asadi Asadabad, and S. Schmauder, Effect of Microstructure Pattern on the Strain Localization in DP600 Steels Analyzed Using Combined In-Situ Experimental Test and Numerical Simulation, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, 638, p 251–261. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.New Technologies Research Center (NTRC)Amirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations