Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 27, Issue 9, pp 4932–4940 | Cite as

Physics-based Constitutive Model for the Hot Deformation of 2Cr11Mo1VNbN Martensitic Stainless Steel

  • Rui Wang
  • Menghan WangEmail author
  • Zhi Li
  • Cheng Lu


The hot deformation behavior of 2Cr11Mo1VNbN martensitic stainless steel is investigated through isothermal compression tests between 1173 and 1423 K with strain rates of 0.005-5 s−1. Based on experimental results, the work hardening–dynamic recovery stage and dynamic softening stage are evaluated, and a couple-stage constitutive model is developed to describe the work hardening–dynamic recovery and dynamic softening behaviors. Phenomenological constitutive models, which consider temperature, strain and strain rate, are established. A comparison between the predicted and experimental flow stress values indicates that the established models accurately describe the hot deformation behaviors for the studied supercritical steel.


constitutive modeling dynamic recrystallization dynamic recovery hot deformation work hardening 



The authors appreciate the financial support from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [Grant Number CDJZR14130006]. The authors would like to thank Emily Purser from University of Wollongong, Australia, and Yao Wen from Hunan Institute of Information Technology, China, for their grammar and spelling check.


  1. 1.
    V. Vilamosa, A.H. Clausen, T. Børvik, B. Holmedal, and O.S. Hopperstad, A physically-Based Constitutive Model Applied to AA6082 Aluminium Alloy at Large Strains, High Strain Rates and Elevated Temperatures, Mater. Des., 2016, 103, p 391–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Momeni, K. Dehghani, and G.R. Ebrahimi, Modeling the Initiation of Dynamic Recrystallization Using a Dynamic Recovery Model, J. Alloys Compd., 2011, 509, p 9387–9393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Farabi, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, and H.R. Abedi, High Temperature Formability Prediction of Dual Phase Brass Using Phenomenological and Physical Constitutive Models, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2015, 24, p 209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Thossatheppitak, V. Uthaisangsuk, P. Mungsuntisuk, S. Suranuntchai, and A. Manonukul, Flow Behavior of Nickel Aluminium Bronze Under Hot Deformation, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, 604, p 183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.Q. Zhang, H.S. Di, and X.Y. Wang, Flow Softening of 253MA Austenitic Stainless Steel During Hot Compression at Higher Strain Rates, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2016, 650, p 483–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Cizek, The Microstructure Evolution and Softening Processes During High-Temperature Deformation of a 21Cr-10Ni-3Mo Duplex Stainless Steel, Acta Mater., 2016, 106, p 129–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K.K. Li, M.S. Chen, Y.C. Lin, and W.Q. Yuan, Microstructural Evolution of an Aged Ni-Based Superalloy Under Two-Stage Hot Compression with Different Strain Rates, Mater. Des., 2016, 111, p 344–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S.S.S. Kumar, T. Raghu, P.P. Bhattacharjee, G.A. Rao, and U. Borah, Constitutive Modeling for Predicting Peak Stress Characteristics During Hot Deformation of Hot Isostatically Processed Nickel-Base Superalloy, J. Mater. Sci., 2015, 50, p 6444–6456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.L. Semiatin and J.J. Jonas, Formability and Workability of Metals, Plastic Instability and Flow Localization, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, 1984Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Graetz, C. Miessen, and G. Gottstein, Analysis of Steady-State Dynamic Recrystallization, Acta Mater., 2014, 67, p 58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Galiyev, R. Kaibyshev, and G. Gottstein, Correlation of Plastic Deformation and Dynamic Recrystallization in Magnesium Alloy ZK60, Acta Mater., 2001, 49, p 1199–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.Q. Zhang, H.S. Di, H.T. Wang, K. Mao, T.J. Ma, and Y. Cao, Hot Deformation Behavior of Ti-15-3 Titanium Alloy: A Study Using Processing Maps, Activation Energy Map, and Zener–Hollomon Parameter Map, J. Mater. Sci., 2012, 47, p 4000–4011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Y.C. Lin, F.Q. Nong, X.M. Chen, D.D. Chen, and M.S. Chen, Microstructural Evolution and Constitutive Models to Predict Hot Deformation Behaviors of a Nickel-Based Superalloy, Vacuum, 2017, 137, p 104–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. Haghdadi, D. Martin, and P. Hodgson, Physically-Based Constitutive Modelling of Hot Deformation Behavior in a LDX 2101 Duplex Stainless Steel, Mater. Des., 2016, 106, p 420–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Mandal, V. Rakesh, P.V. Sivaprasad, S. Venugopal, and K.V. Kasiviswanathan, Constitutive Equations to Predict High Temperature Flow Stress in a Ti-Modified Austenitic Stainless Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, 500, p 114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A.K. Guptaa, V.K. Anirudh, and S.K. Singh, Constitutive Models to Predict Flow Stress in Austenitic Stainless Steel 316 at Elevated Temperatures, Mater. Des., 2013, 43, p 410–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Momeni and K. Dehghani, Characterization of Hot Deformation Behavior of 410 Martensitic Stainless Steel Using Constitutive Equations and Processing Maps, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, 527, p 5467–5473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. Ren, J. Chen, and F. Chen, Constitutive Modeling of Hot Deformation Behavior of X20Cr13 Martensitic Stainless Steel with Strain Effect, Trans. Nonferr. Metal. Soc., 2014, 24, p 1407–1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S.M. Mohseni, A.B. Phillion, and D.M. Maijer, Modelling the Constitutive Behaviour of Aluminium Alloy B206 in the as-Cast and Artificially Aged States, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2016, 649, p 382–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Z.Y. Zeng, L.Q. Chen, F.X. Zhu, and X.H. Liu, Dynamic Recrystallization Behavior of a Heat-Resistant Martensitic Stainless Steel 403Nb During Hot Deformation, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2011, 27, p 913–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Abbasi-Bani, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, M.H. Pishbin, and N. Haghdadi, A comparative Study on the Capability of Johnson-Cook and Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Equations to Describe the Flow Behavior of Mg-6Al-1Zn Alloy, Mech. Mater., 2014, 71, p 52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    H.Y. Li, Y.H. Li, X.F. Wang, J.J. Liu, and Y. Wu, A comparative Study on Modified Johnson Cook, Modified Zerilli–Armstrong and Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Models to Predict the Hot Deformation Behavior in 28CrMnMoV Steel, Mater. Des., 2013, 49, p 493–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Bobbili and V. Madhu, Constitutive Modeling of Hot Deformation Behavior of High-Strength Armor Steel, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2016, 25, p 1829–1838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Q.C. Fan, X.Q. Jiang, Z.H. Zhou, W. Ji, and H.Q. Cao, Constitutive Relationship and Hot Deformation Behavior of Armco-Type Pure Iron for a Wide Range of Temperature, Mater. Des., 2015, 65, p 193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. Hajari, M. Morakabati, S.M. Abbasi, and H. Badri, Constitutive Modeling for High-Temperature Flow Behavior of Ti-6242S Alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, 681, p 103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    X.M. Chen, Y.C. Lin, D.X. Wen, J.L. Zhang, and M. He, Dynamic Recrystallization Behavior of a Typical Nickel-Based Superalloy During Hot Deformation, Mater. Des., 2014, 57, p 568–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Laasraoui and J. Jonas, Prediction of Steel Flow Stresses at High Temperature and Strain Rates, Metall. Trans. A, 1991, 22, p 1545–1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Yoshie, H. Morikawa, Y. Onoe, and K. Itoh, Formulation of Static Recrystallization of Austenite in Hot Rolling Process of Steel Plate, Trans. ISIJ, 1987, 27, p 425–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Y.G. Liu, M.Q. Li, and J. Luo, The Modeling of Dynamic Recrystallization in the Isothermal Compression of 300M Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2013, 574, p 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    W.Q. Li and Q.X. Ma, Constitutive Modeling for Investigating the Effects of Friction on Rheological Behavior During Hot Deformation, Mater. Des., 2016, 97, p 64–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    E.I. Poliak and J.J. Jonas, A One-Parameter Approach to Determining the Critical Conditions for the Initiation of Dynamic Recrystallization, Acta Mater., 1996, 44, p 127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    D. Trimble and G.E. O’Donnell, Constitutive Modelling for Elevated Temperature Flow Behaviour of AA7075, Mater. Des., 2015, 76, p 150–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Y.C. Lin, X.M. Chen, D.X. Wen, and M.S. Chen, A Physically-Based Constitutive Model for a Typical Nickel-Based Superalloy, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2014, 83, p 282–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    D.Q. Dong, F. Chen, and Z.S. Cui, A Physically-Based Constitutive Model for SA508-III, Steel: Modeling and Experimental Verification, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, 607, p 630–639Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    M.H. Wang, Y.F. Li, W.H. Wang, J. Zhou, and A. Chiba, Quantitative Analysis of Work Hardening and Dynamic Softening Behavior of Low Carbon Alloy Steel Based on the Flow Stress, Mater. Des., 2013, 45, p 384–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    J. Wang, H. Xiao, H.B. Xie, X.M. Xu, and Y.N. Gao, Study on Hot Deformation Behavior of Carbon Structural Steel with Flow Stress, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 539, p 294–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    G.L. Ji, F.G. Li, Q.H. Li, H.Q. Li, and Z. Li, Research on the Dynamic Recrystallization Kinetics of Aermet100 Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, 527, p 2350–2355CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical, Materials, Mechatronic and Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  2. 2.School of Material Science and EngineeringChongqing UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations