Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 4138–4147 | Cite as

Influence of Powder Characteristics on Formation of Porosity in Additive Manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V Components

  • Maurizio Iebba
  • Antonello Astarita
  • Daniela Mistretta
  • Ivano Colonna
  • Mariacira Liberini
  • Fabio Scherillo
  • Carmine Pirozzi
  • Rosario Borrelli
  • Stefania Franchitti
  • Antonino Squillace
Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
  • 483 Downloads

Abstract

This paper aims to study the genesis of defects in titanium components made through two different additive manufacturing technologies: selective laser melting and electron beam melting. In particular, we focussed on the influence of the powders used on the formation of porosities and cavities in the manufactured components. A detailed experimental campaign was carried out to characterize the components made through the two additive manufacturing techniques aforementioned and the powders used in the process. It was found that some defects of the final components can be attributed to internal porosities of the powders used in the manufacturing process. These internal porosities are a consequence of the gas atomization process used for the production of the powders themselves. Therefore, the importance of using tailored powders, free from porosities, in order to manufacture components with high mechanical properties is highlighted.

Keywords

defects EBM metallography SLM Ti6Al4V 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are gratefully to Dr. Antonella Scherillo (STFC-ISIS Facility, RAL, OX11 0Q, Didcot, UK) for her precious support in the interpretation and discussion of the results.

References

  1. 1.
    I. Gibson, D. Rosem, and B. Stucker, Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Springer, Berlin, 2014, p 19–42Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K.V. Wong and A. Hernandez, A Review of Additive Manufacturing, Int. Sch. Res. Netw., 2012, 2012, 208760. doi: 10.5402/2012/208760
  3. 3.
    W.E. Frazier, Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review, ASM International, Materials Park, 2014Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ASTM (2010), Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2012Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G.N. Levy, R. Schindel, and J.P. Kruth, Rapid Manufacturing and Rapid Tooling with Layer Manufacturing (LM) Technologies: State of the Art and Future Perspectives, CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., 2003, 52, p 589–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.D. Gu, W. Meiners, K. Wissenbach, and R. Poprawe, Laser Additive Manufacturing of Metallic Components: Materials, Processes and Mechanisms, Int. Mater. Rev., 2012, 57(3), p 133–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Seifi, A. Salem, J. Beuth et al., Overview of Materials Qualification Needs for Metal Additive Manufacturing, JOM, 2016, 68, p 747. doi: 10.1007/s11837-015-1810-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Chauke, K. Mutombo, and C. Kgomo, Characterization of the Direct Metal Laser Sintered Ti6Al4V Components; 1,2,3 Material Science and Manufacturing/Light Metals, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Pretoria, 2013Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y.J. Liu, S.J. Li, H.L. Wang, W.T. Hou, Y.L. Hao, R. Yang, T.B. Sercombe, and L.C. Zhang, Microstructure, Defects and Mechanical Behavior of Beta-Type Titanium Porous Structures Manufactured by Electron Beam Melting and Selective Laser Melting, Acta Mater., 2016, 113, p 56–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y.J. Liu, H.L. Wang, S.J. Lib, S.G. Wang, W.J. Wang, W.T. Hou, Y.L. Hao, R. Yang, and L.C. Zhang, Compressive and Fatigue Behavior of Beta-Type Titanium Porous Structures Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting, Acta Mater., 2017, 126, p 58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Sallica-Leva, A.L. Jardini, and J.B. Fogagnolo, Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior of Porous Ti-6Al-4V Parts Obtained by Selective Laser Melting, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2013, 26, p 98–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. Dai, L.-C. Zhang, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, Q. Ni, Y. Chen, W. Maoliang, and C. Yang, Distinction in Corrosion Resistance of Selective Laser Melted Ti-6Al-4V Alloy on Different Planes, Corros. Sci., 2016, 111, p 703–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. Dai, L.-C. Zhang, J. Zhang, Q. Chen, and M. Wu, Corrosion Behavior of Selective Laser Melted Ti-6Al-4V Alloy in NaCl Solution, Corros. Sci., 2016, 102, p 484–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    L.E. Murr, S.A. Quinones, S.M. Gaytan, M.I. Lopez, A. Rodela, E.Y. Martinez, D.H. Hernandez, E. Martinez, F. Medina, and R.B. Wicker, Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V Produced by Rapid-Layer Manufacturing, for Biomedical Applications, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2009, 2, p 20–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Koike, P. Greer, K. Owen, G. Lilly, L.E. Murr, S.M. Gaytan, E. Martinez, and T. Okabe, Evaluation of Titanium Alloys Fabricated Using Rapid Prototyping Technologies—Electron Beam Melting and Laser Beam Melting, Materials, 2011, 4(10), p 1776–1792. doi: 10.3390/ma4101776 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.-P. Kruth, G. Levy, F. Klocke, and T.H.C. Childs, Consolidation Phenomena in Laser and Powder-Bed Based Layered Manufacturing, Ann. CIRP, 2007, 56(2), p 730. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. Hrabe and T. Quinn, Effects of Processing on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of a Titanium Alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) Fabricated Using Electron Beam Melting (EBM), Part 1: Distance from Build Plate and Part Size, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2013, 573, p 264–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. Loeber, S. Biamino, U. Ackelid, S. Sabbadini, P. Epicoco, P. Fino, J. Eckert, Comparison of Selective Laser and Electron Beam Melted Titanium Aluminides, in Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, USA, p 8–10.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    X. Zhao et al., Comparison of the Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-4V Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting, Mater. Des., 2016, 95, p 21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Reginster et al., Processing of Ti Alloys by Additive Manufacturing: A Comparison of the Microstructures Obtained by Laser Cladding, Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting. Materials Science Forum, Trans Tech Publications, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, 2013Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    L.-C. Zhang and H. Attar, Selective Laser Melting of Titanium Alloys and Titanium Matrix Composites for Biomedical Applications: A Review, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2016, 18, p 463–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.H. Moll, Utilization of Gas-Atomized Titanium and Titanium-Aluminide Powder, Overv. Powder Mater., 2000, 52(5), p 32–33Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    H. Gong, K. Rafi, G. Hengfeng, G.D.J. Ram, T. Starr, and B. Stucker, Influence of Defects on Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-4V Components Produced by Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting, Mater. Des., 2015, 86(5), p 545–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    F.H. Froes, Ed., Titanium—Physical Metallurgy Processing and Applications, ASM International, Materials Park, 2015, p 172–175Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    L.C. Zhang, D. Klemm, J. Eckert, Y.L. Hao, and T.B. Sercombe, Manufacture by Selective Laser Melting and Mechanical Behavior of a Biomedical Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn Alloy, Scr. Mater., 2011, 65, p 21–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    H. Attar, M. Calin, L.C. Zhang, S. Scudino, and J. Eckert, Manufacture by Selective Laser Melting and Mechanical Behavior of Commercially Pure Titanium, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2014, 593, p 170–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    N. Hrabe, T. Gnäupel-Herold, and T. Quinn, Fatigue Properties of a Titanium Alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) Fabricated Via Electron Beam Melting (EBM): Effects of Internal Defects and Residual Stress, Int. J. Fatigue, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.04.022 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Y. Zhai, H. Galarraga, and D.A. Lados, Microstructure Evolution, Tensile Properties, and Fatigue Damage Mechanisms in Ti-6Al-4V Alloys Fabricated by Two Additive Manufacturing Techniques, Proc. Eng., 2015, 114, p 658–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    D. Gu, Y.-C. Hagedorn, W. Meiners, G. Meng, R.J.S. Batista, K. Wissenbach, and R. Poprawe, Densification Behavior, Microstructure Evolution, and Wear Performance of Selective Laser Melting Processed Commercially Pure Titanium, Acta Mater., 2012, 60, p 3849–3860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. Xia, D. Gua, Yu Guanqun, D. Dai, H. Chen, and Q. Shi, Porosity Evolution and Its Thermodynamic Mechanism of Randomly Packed Powder-Bed During Selective Laser Melting of Inconel 718 Alloy, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, 2017, 116, p 96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    C. Qiu, N.J.E. Adkins, and M.M. Attallah, Microstructure and Tensile Properties of Selectively Laser-Melted and of HIPed Laser-Melted Ti-6Al-4V, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2013, 578, p 230–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maurizio Iebba
    • 1
  • Antonello Astarita
    • 2
  • Daniela Mistretta
    • 1
  • Ivano Colonna
    • 1
  • Mariacira Liberini
    • 2
  • Fabio Scherillo
    • 2
  • Carmine Pirozzi
    • 3
  • Rosario Borrelli
    • 3
  • Stefania Franchitti
    • 3
  • Antonino Squillace
    • 2
  1. 1.Ala Corporation, ALA S.p.A.NaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of Chemical, Materials and Production EngineeringUniversity of Naples “Federico II”NaplesItaly
  3. 3.CIRA - Italian Aerospace Research CentreCapuaItaly

Personalised recommendations