Advertisement

Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 25, Issue 11, pp 4868–4874 | Cite as

A Novel Creep-Fatigue Life Prediction Model for P92 Steel on the Basis of Cyclic Strain Energy Density

  • Dongmei Ji
  • Jianxing Ren
  • Lai-Chang Zhang
Article

Abstract

A novel creep-fatigue life prediction model was deduced based on an expression of the strain energy density in this study. In order to obtain the expression of the strain energy density, the load-controlled creep-fatigue (CF) tests of P92 steel at 873 K were carried out. Cyclic strain of P92 steel under CF load was divided into elastic strain, applying and unloading plastic strain, creep strain, and anelastic strain. Analysis of cyclic strain indicates that the damage process of P92 steel under CF load consists of three stages, similar to pure creep. According to the characteristics of the strains above, an expression was defined to describe the strain energy density for each cycle. The strain energy density at stable stage is inversely proportional to the total strain energy density dissipated by P92 steel. However, the total strain energy densities under different test conditions are proportional to the fatigue life. Therefore, the expression of the strain energy density at stable stage was chosen to predict the fatigue life. The CF experimental data on P92 steel were employed to verify the rationality of the novel model. The model obtained from the load-controlled CF test of P92 steel with short holding time could predict the fatigue life of P92 steel with long holding time.

Keywords

creep-fatigue life prediction load-controlled P92 steel strain energy density 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51201097) and Shanghai Science and technology Project (15110501000).

References

  1. 1.
    O. Scott-Emuakpor, M.-H. Shen, C. Cross, J. Calcaterra, and T. George, Development of an Improved High Cycle Fatigue Criterion, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 2007, 129, p 162–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Viswanathan and W. Bakker, Materials for Ultra-Supercritical Coal Power Plants-Boiler Materials: Part 1, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2001, 10, p 81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Takahashi, Study on Creep-Fatigue Evaluation Procedures for High Chromium Steels Part II, Sensitivity to Calculated Deformation, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 2008, 85, p 423–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.A. Miner, Cumulative Damage in Fatigue, J. Appl. Mech., 1945, 12, p A159–A164Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.H. Priest and E.G. Ellison, A Combined Deformation Map-Ductility Exhaustion Approach to Creep-Fatigue Analysis, Mater. Sci. Eng., 1981, 49, p 7–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L.F. Coffin, Fatigue at High Temperature and Interpretation, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 1974, 188(9), p 109–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L.F. Coffin, The Concept of Frequency Separation in Life Prediction for Time-Dependent Fatigue, ASME-MPC Symp. Creep-Fatigue Interact., 1976, p 349–364Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S.S. Manson, G.R. Halford and M.H. Hirschberg, Creep-Fatigue Analysis by Strain-Range Partitioning, ASME Proc. Symp. Des. Elevated Temp. Env., 1971, p 12–28Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Lemaitre and A. Plumtree, Application of Damage Concepts to Predict Creep-Fatigue Failures, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 1979, 101, p 284–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Lemaitre, How to Use Damage Mechanics, Nuclear Eng. Design, 1984, 80, p 233–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W.J. Ostergren, A Damage Foundation Hold Time and Frequency Effects in Elevated Temperature Low Cycle Fatigue, J. Test. Eval., 1967, p 327–339Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S.P. Zhu, H.Z. Huang, L.P. He, Y. Liu, and Z.L. Wang, A Generalized Energy-Based Fatigue-Creep Damage Parameter for Life Prediction of Turbine Disk Alloys, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2012, 90, p 89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S.P. Zhu and H.Z. Huang, A Generalized Frequency Separation-Strain Energy Damage Function Model for Low Cycle Fatigue-Creep Life Prediction, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2010, 33, p 227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S.P. Zhu, H.Z. Huang, Y.F. Li, and L.P. He, A Novel Viscosity-Based Model for Low Cycle Fatigue-Creep Life Prediction of High-Temperature Structures, Int. J. Damage Mech., 2012, 21, p 1076–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Ji, L. Zhang, J. Ren, and D. Wang, Creep-Fatigue Interaction and Cyclic Strain Analysis in P92 Steel Based on Test, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2015, 24, p 1441–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. Zhao and F. Xuan, Ratchetting Behavior of Advanced 9-12% Chromium Ferrite Steel Under Creep-Fatigue Loadings, Mech. Mater., 2011, 43, p 299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Zhang, Y. Zhao, F. Xue, J. Mei, Z. Wang, C. Zhou, and L. Zhang, Creep-Fatigue Interaction Damage Model and its Application in Modified 9Cr-1Mo Steel, Nuclear Eng. Des., 2011, 241, p 4856–4861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. Fournier, M. Auzay, C. Caës, M. Noblecourt, M. Mottot, A. Bougault, V. Rabeau, and A. Pineau, Creep-Fatigue-Oxidation Interactions in a 9Cr-1Mo Martensitic Steel. Part II: Effect of Compressive Holding Period on Fatigue Lifetime, Int. J. Fatigue, 2008, 30, p 663–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shanghai University of Electric PowerShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Edith Cowan University - School of EngineeringPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations