Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 25, Issue 8, pp 3128–3133 | Cite as

Mechanical Properties of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Aluminum Manufactured by High-Pressure Die Casting

Article

Abstract

Carbon fiber reinforced aluminum was produced by a specially adapted high-pressure die casting process. The MMC has a fiber volume fraction of 27%. Complete infiltration was achieved by preheating the bidirectional, PAN-based carbon fiber body with IR-emitters to temperatures of around 750 °C. The degradation of the fibers, due to attack of atmospheric oxygen at temperatures above 600 °C, was limited by heating them in argon-rich atmosphere. Additionally, the optimization of heating time and temperature prevented fiber degradation. Only the strength of the outer fibers is reduced by 40% at the most. The fibers in core of fiber body are nearly undamaged. In spite of successful manufacturing, the tensile strength of the MMC is below strength of the matrix material. Also unidirectional MMCs with a fiber volume fraction of 8% produced under the same conditions, lack of the reinforcing effect. Two main reasons for the unsatisfactory mechanical properties were identified: First, the fiber-free matrix, which covers the reinforced core, prevents effective load transfer from the matrix to the fibers. And second, the residual stresses in the fiber-free zones are as high as 100 MPa. This causes premature failure in the matrix. From this, it follows that the local reinforcement of an actual part is limited. The stress distribution caused by residual stresses and by loading needs to be known. In this way, the reinforcing phase can be placed and aligned accordingly. Otherwise delamination and premature failure might occur.

Keywords

carbon fibers composites metallic matrix modeling and simulation residual stress tensile testing 

References

  1. 1.
    H.P. Degischer, P. Schulz, and W. Lacom, Properties of Continuous Fiber Reinforced Al- and Mg-Matrix Composites Produced by Gas Pressure Infiltration, Key Eng. Mater., 1997, 127–131, p 99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.B. Miracle, Metal Matrix Composites—From Science to Technological Significance, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2005, 65(15-16 SPEC. ISS), p 2526–2540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Rawal, Metal-Matrix Composites for Space Applications, JOM, 2001, 53(4), p 14–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Ballmes, Aluminiummatrix-Faserverbundwerkstoffe im Druckgießprozess—Verfahrensgrundlagen und Produkteigenschaften, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, 2013 (in German)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Kozera, Carbon Fibers and Their Surface Modification for Aluminium Alloy Matrix Composites, Warsaw University of Technology, Warszawa, 2014Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H.-D. Steffens, B. Reznik, V. Kruzhanov, and W. Dudzinski, Carbide Formation in Aluminium-Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Composites, J. Mater. Sci., 1997, 32(20), p 5413–5417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Hufenbach, M. Gude, and F. Engelmann, Influence of Different Aluminium Alloys on the Material Properties of CF/Al-MMC Manufactured by GPI, Method, Kompozyty, 2010, 10(2), p 143–148Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Asthana, Reinforced Cast Metals: Part II, Evolution of the Interface, J. Mater. Sci., 1998, 33(8), p 1959–1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Cho, B.I. Yoon, H.S. Ha, and Y.S. Lim, Microscopic Behavior on the Protection of Polyacrylonitrile-Based Carbon Fibers from Thermal Oxidation, Polym. J., 1997, 29(12), p 959–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y.-Q. Wang, B.-L. Zhou, and Z.-M. Wang, Oxidation Protection Of Carbon Fibers by Coatings, Carbon, 1995, 33(4), p 427–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Hufenbach, M. Gude, A. Czulak, F. Engelmann, K.J. Kurzydłowski, and J. Sleziona, Characterisation of CF/Al-MMC Manufactured by Means of Gas Pressure Infilration, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2011, 690, p 116–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Daoud, Microstructure and Tensile Properties of 2014 Al Alloy Reinforced with Continuous Carbon Fibers Manufactured by Gas Pressure Infiltration, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, 391(1–2), p 114–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Toho Tenax Europe GmbH, HTA Delivery programme and characteristics, http://www.tohotenax-eu.com/fileadmin/tohotenax/downloads/Produkte/Technische%20Datenblaetter/en/PPD_Tenax-HTA40_v04_2014-09-30_en.pdf, 2014. Accessed 11 Nov 2015
  14. 14.
    VAR, Aluminium-Gusslegierungen, Verband der Aluminiumrecycling-Industrie, Düsseldorf, 2010 (in German)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Schürmann, Konstruieren mit Faser-Kunststoff-Verbunden, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2005 (in German)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations