Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 1463–1473 | Cite as

Interrelation of Steel Composition, Hardening Route, and Tempering Response of Medium Carbon Low-Alloy Steels

  • Abdel-Hamid A. Hussein
  • Mahmoud T. Abdu
  • El-Sayed M. El-Banna
  • Saied E. Soliman
  • Mahmoud M. Tash
Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:

Abstract

Four medium carbon and low-alloy steels were hardened through oil and forced air cooling. Tempering was then performed in the temperature range 250-600 °C. The martensite content increased with an increased hardenability and/or the rate of cooling. Tempering at T > M s caused a gradual decline in both hardness and strength and an improvement in the Charpy V-notch impact toughness. The low-alloy steels underwent tempered martensite embrittlement (as a result of the formation of carbides at the martensite interlaths and prior austenite grain boundaries) and enhancement of phosphorus segregation (particularly in the presence of Ni). Higher hardenability steels were found to be better hardened via the more recent forced air quenching rather than the conventional oil quenching. In this work, a modest, novel attempt is presented to empirically correlate the impact toughness with the hardness measurements to enable future prediction of impact toughness from hardness measurements.

Keywords

heat treatment microscopy modeling and simulation optical metallography steel 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    ASM Handbook Committee et al., Classification and designation of carbon and low-alloy steels, ASM handbook, Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels, High-Performance Alloys, Vol 1, 10th ed., K.M. Zwilsky, Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, 1991, p 140–194Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.D. Callister, Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 7th ed., Wiley, New York, 2007, p 311–315Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.E. Bates, G.E. Totten, R.L. Brennan et al., Heat treating, Heat Treating, Vol 4, 10th ed., S.M. Copley, Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, 1990, p 67Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Abbaschian, L. Abbaschian, and R.E. Reed-Hill, Physical Metallurgy Principles, 4th ed., Cengage Learning, Connecticut, 2009, p 562Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Z. Altagoury, M.T. Abdu, M.A. Adly, and A. Elhabak, Electrolytic Surface Hardening of DIN 42CrMo4 (AISI, 4140) Medium Carbon Low Alloy Steel, Int. J. Adv. Eng. Technol. Comput. Sci. (IJAETCS), 2014, 1, p 20–27Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Lu, A Study on Gas Quench Steel Hardenability, M.S. Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA, 2015.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ASTM A255-10(2014), Standard Test Methods for Determining Hardenability of Steel, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ASTM E140-12be1, Standard Hardness Conversion Tables for Metals Relationship Among Brinell Hardness, Vickers Hardness, Rockwell Hardness, Superficial Hardness, Knoop Hardness, Scleroscope Hardness, and Leeb Hardness, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Gojic, L. Kosec, and P. Matkovic, The Effect of Tempering Temperature on Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Low Alloy Cr and CrMo Steel, J. Mater. Sci., 1998, 33, p 395–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    W.S. Lee and T.T. Su, Mechanical Properties and Microstructural Features of AISI 4340 High-Strength Alloy Steel Under Quenched and Tempered Conditions, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1999, 87, p 198–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Krauss, Tempering of martensite, Encyclopedia of Materials Science and Technology, 2nd ed., Elsevier, New York, 2001, p 9093–9097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Krauss, Martensite in Steel: Strength and Structure, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1999, 273–275A, p 40–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Chaouch, S. Guessasma, and A. Sadok, Finite Element Simulation Coupled to Optimisation Stochastic Process to Assess the Effect of Heat Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of 42CrMo4 Steel, Mater. Des., 2012, 34, p 679–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    W.J. Nam, D.S. Kim, and S.T. Ahn, Effect of Alloying Elements on Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical Properties of Induction Quenched-and-Tempered Steels, J. Mater. Sci., 2003, 38, p 3611–3618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Honeycombe and H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, Steels: Microstructure and Properties, 2nd ed., Edward Armold, London, 1996Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    T.V. Rajan, C.P. Shama, and A. Sharama, Heat Treatment Principles and Techniques, Prentice-Hall of India private Ltd., New Delhi, 1998Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G.F. Vander Voort, Atlas of Time-Temperature Diagrams for Irons and Steels, ASM International, Ohio, 1991Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D.R. Askeland and P.P. Fulay, Essentials of Materials Science and Engineering, 2nd ed., Cengage Learning, Ontario, 2009, p 391Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B.A. Miller et al., Overload failures, ASM Handbook, Failure Analysis and Prevention, Vol 11, 10th ed., G.H. Geiger, Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, 1954,Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R.M. Horn and R.O. Ritchie, Mechanisms of Tempered Martensite Embrittlement in Low Alloy Steels, Metall. Trans. A, 1978, 9, p 1039–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. Raoul, B. Marini, and A. Pineau, Effect of Microstructure on the Susceptibility of A533 Steel to Temper Embrittlement, J. Nucl. Mater., 1998, 257, p 199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A.K. Sinha, Physical Metallurgy Handbook, 1st ed., McGraw Hill, New York, 2003Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    K.B. Lee, S.H. Yoon, and H. Kwon, On the Transgranular Type of Tempered Martensite Embrittlement, Scr. Metall. Mater., 1994, 30, p 1111–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. Thomas, Retained Austenite and Tempered Martensite Embrittlement, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1978, 9, p 439–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Kwon and C.H. Kim, Tempered Martensite Embrittlement in Fe-Mo-C and Fe-W-C Steel, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1983, 14, p 1389–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia and D.V. Emonds, Tempered Martensite Embrittlement: Role of Retained Austenite and Cementite, Metal Sci., 1979, 13, p 325–334Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    J.A. Peters, J.V. Bee, B. Kolk, and G.G. Garrett, On the Mechanisms of Tempered Martensite Embrittlement, Acta Metall., 1989, 37, p 675–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    C.L. Briant and S.K. Banerji, The Fracture Behavior of Quenched and Tempered Manganese Steel, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1982, 13, p 827–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    H. Kwon and C.H. Kim, Consideration on the Intergranular Tempered Martensite Embrittlement, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1984, 15, p 393–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. Sarikaya, A.K. Jhingan, and G. Thomas, Retained Austenite and Tempered Martensite Embrittlement in Medium Carbon Steel, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1983, 14, p 1121–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    J.P. Materkowski and G. Krauss, Tempered Martensite Embrittlement in SAE 4340 Steel, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1979, 10, p 1643–1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    S. Suzuki, M. Tanino, and Y. Waseda, Phosphorus and Boron Segregation at Prior Austenite Grain Boundaries in Low-Alloyed Steel, ISIJ Int., 2002, 42, p 676–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    M.A. Islam, M. Novovic, P. Bowen, and J.K. Knott, Effect of Phosphorus Segregation on Fracture Properties of 2.25Cr-1Mo Pressure Vessel Steel, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2003, 12, p 244–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    F.A. Darwish, L.C. Pereira, C. Gatts, and M.L. Graça, On the Tempered Martensite Embrittlement in AISI, 4140 Low Alloy Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1991, 132, p L5–L9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    C.L. Briant and S.K. Banerji, The Effect of Molybdenum on Tempered Martensite Embrittlement, Scr. Metall. Mater., 1979, 13, p 813–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    S.H. Song, R.G. Faulkner, and P.E.J. Flewitt, Quenching and Tempering Induced Molybdenum Segregation to Grain Boundaries in a 2.25Cr-1Mo Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000, 281, p 23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    L. Li, E.B. Liu, Q.F. Li, and Z. Li, Non Equilibrium Grain Boundary Cosegregation of Mo and P, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2006, 252, p 3989–3992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    A.J. Papworth and D.B. Williams, Segregation to Prior Austenite Grain Boundaries in Low Alloy Steels, Scr. Mater., 2000, 42, p 1107–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    S. Maropoulos, N. Ridley, and S. Karagiannis, Structural Variation in Heat Treated Low Alloy Steel Forgings, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, 380, p 79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    M.J. Peet, Transformation and Tempering of Low-Temperature Bainite, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cambridge (2010).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdel-Hamid A. Hussein
    • 1
  • Mahmoud T. Abdu
    • 1
  • El-Sayed M. El-Banna
    • 1
  • Saied E. Soliman
    • 2
  • Mahmoud M. Tash
    • 1
  1. 1.Mining, Petroleum and Metallurgical Engineering Department, Faculty of EngineeringCairo UniversityGizaEgypt
  2. 2.The Arab Company for Special Steel (ARCOSTEEL)Sadat CityEgypt

Personalised recommendations