Advertisement

Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 338–347 | Cite as

Surface Modification of Oilfield Alloys by Ultrasonic Impact Peening: UNS N07718, N07716, G41400, and S17400

  • Virendra Singh
  • Manuel Marya
Article

Abstract

Ultrasonic impact peening (UIP) is a severe plastic deformation process to induce localized surface hardening combined with compressive residual stresses which therefore extends the useful life of mechanical parts. In this investigation, UIP has been applied to four widespread alloys in use in the oilfields. These include two premium NiCrMo alloys, UNS N07718 (718) and UNS N07716 (625 Plus®), both characterized by satisfactory oilfield performance but lacking hardness and abrasive wear resistance, and two relatively low-cost alloys, UNS G41400 (4140) and UNS S17400 (17-4PH), both limited by their corrosion fatigue. To promote comparisons and determine important alloy parameters for successful UIP, all four alloys were carefully selected so that their respective yield strengths were within relative proximity (~780 to ~910 MPa), and then ultrasonically impact peened under identical conditions. Among major findings from microstructural examinations, micro-hardness indentations, and residual stress measurements, surface topological changes (roughness), alloy microstructural evolution (depth and extent of strain hardening, including mechanical twinning in the NiCrMo alloys), and compressive residual stresses were found to be well correlated. Among all four alloys, the NiCrMo alloys, in particular UNS N07716 was found to be best suited for UIP. This is explained by its FCC austenitic microstructure, relatively low stacking-fault energy (prone to mechanical twinning), and in practical terms high yield strength and high tensile-to-yield strength ratio, both related to its excellent plastic flow behavior under ultrasonic rates of plastic deformation.

Keywords

coatings material by design oilfield alloys residual stresses ultrasonic impact peening 

References

  1. 1.
    J.P. Millet, S. Chechirlian, X.Z. Chen, and H. Mazille, Corrosion Behaviour of Nitrided Steels in Sodium Chloride Solutions, Key Eng. Mater., 1987, 2028(pt 1–4)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.P. Brühl, R. Charadia, S. Simison, D.G. Lamas, and A. Cabo, Corrosion Behavior of Martensitic and Precipitation Hardening Stainless Steels Treated by Plasma Nitriding, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2010, 204(20), p 3280–3286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.X. Li and T. Bell, Corrosion Properties of Plasma Nitrided AISI, 410 Martensitic Stainless Steel in 3.5% NaCl and 1% HCl Aqueous Solutions, Corros. Sci., 2006, 48(8), p 2036–2049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N.R. Tao, H.W. Zhang, H. Lu, and K. Lu, Development of Nanostructures in Metallic Materials with Low Stacking Fault Energies During Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment (SMAT), Mater. Trans., 2003, 44(10), p 1919–1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. Altenberger, B. Scholtes, U. Martin, and H. Oettel, Cyclic Deformation and Near Surface Microstructures of Shot Peened or Deep Rolled Austenitic Stainless Steel AISI, 304, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1999, 264(1–2), p 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    X. Wu, N. Tao, Y. Hong, B. Xu, J. Lu, and K. Lu, Microstructure and Evolution of Mechanically-Induced Ultrafine Grain in Surface Layer of AL-Alloy Subjected to USSP, Acta Mater., 2002, 50(8), p 2075–2084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N.R. Tao, M.L. Sui, J. Lu, and K. Lua, Surface nanocrystallization of Iron Induced by Ultrasonic Shot Peening, Nanostruct. Mater., 1999, 11(4), p 433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    B.N. Mordyuk and G.I. Prokopenko, Ultrasonic Impact Peening for the Surface Properties’ Management, J. Sound Vib., 2007, 308(3–5), p 855–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    X.H. Cheng, J.W. Fisher, H.J. Prask, T. Gnaupel-Herold, B.T. Yen, and S. Roy, Residual Stress Modification by Post-Weld Treatment and Its Beneficial Effect on Fatigue Strength of Welded Structures, Int. J. Fatigue, 2003, 25(9–11), p 1259–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Sun, Sliding Wear Behaviour of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treated AISI, 304 Stainless Steel, Tribol. Int., 2013, 57, p 67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Li, J. Chen, and D. Guan, Friction and Wear Behaviors of Nanocrystalline Surface Layer of Medium Carbon Steel, Tribol. Int., 2010, 43(11), p 2216–2221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. W. Bunting, L. P. Palmisano, E. R. Brown, D. R. Malley, and D.A. Rutz, Method for Ultrasonic Peening of Gas Turbine Engine Components Without Engine Disassembly, 2009.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    N.R. Tao, Z.B. Wang, W.P. Tong, M.L. Sui, J. Lu, and K. Lu, An Investigation of Surface Nanocrystallization Mechanism in Fe Induced by Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, Acta Mater., 2002, 50(18), p 4603–4616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E.W. Qin, L. Lu, N.R. Tao, J. Tan, and K. Lu, Enhanced Fracture Toughness and Strength in Bulk Nanocrystalline Cu with Nanoscale Twin Bundles, Acta Mater., 2009, 57(20), p 6215–6225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H.W. Zhang, Z.K. Hei, G. Liu, J. Lu, and K. Lu, Formation of Nanostructured Surface Layer on AISI, 304 Stainless Steel by Means of Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, Acta Mater., 2003, 51(7), p 1871–1881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Liu, J. Lu, and K. Lu, Surface Nanocrystallization of 316L Stainless Steel Induced by Ultrasonic Shot Peening, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000, 286(1), p 91–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A.L. Ortiz, J.W. Tian, J.C. Villegas, L.L. Shaw, and P.K. Liaw, Interrogation of the Microstructure and Residual Stress of a Nickel-Base Alloy Subjected to Surface Severe Plastic Deformation, Acta Mater., 2008, 56(3), p 413–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. Lu and J. Lu, Nanostructured Surface Layer on Metallic Materials Induced by Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, 375–377, p 38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.C. Villegas and L.L. Shaw, Nanocrystallization Process and Mechanism in a Nickel Alloy Subjected to Surface Severe Plastic Deformation, Acta Mater., 2009, 57(19), p 5782–5795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Sandá, V. García Navas, and O. Gonzalo, Surface State of Inconel 718 Ultrasonic Shot Peened: Effect of Processing Time, Material and Quantity of Shot Balls and distance from Radiating Surface to Sample, Mater. Des., 2011, 32(4), p 2213–2220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    K. Dai, J. Villegas, Z. Stone, and L. Shaw, Finite Element Modeling of the surface Roughness of 5052 Al Alloy Subjected to a Surface Severe Plastic Deformation Process, Acta Mater., 2004, 52(20), p 5771–5782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.C. Villegas, K. Dai, L.L. Shaw, and P.K. Liaw, Nanocrystallization of a Nickel Alloy Subjected to Surface Severe Plastic Deformation, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, 410–411, p 257–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    N.R. Tao, X.L. Wu, M.L. Sui, J. Lu, and K. Lu, Grain Refinement at the Nanoscale Via Mechanical Twinning and Dislocation Interaction in a Nickel-Based Alloy, J. Mater. Res., 2004, 19(06), p 1623–1629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. Fournier and A. Pineau, Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Inconel 718 at 298 K and 823 K, MTA, 1977, 8(7), p 1095–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    G. Liu, S.C. Wang, X.F. Lou, J. Lu, and K. Lu, Low Carbon Steel with Nanostructured Surface Layer Induced by High-Energy Shot Peening, Scripta Mater., 2001, 44(8–9), p 1791–1795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Y. Sun, Kinetics of Layer Growth During Plasma Nitriding of Nickel Based Alloy Inconel 600, J. Alloy Compd., 2003, 351(1–2), p 241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Enabling Technology Group, Materials EngineeringSchlumbergerRosharonUSA

Personalised recommendations