Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 24, Issue 11, pp 4388–4399 | Cite as

Finite Element Creep-Fatigue Analysis of a Welded Furnace Roll for Identifying Failure Root Cause

Article
  • 191 Downloads

Abstract

Creep-fatigue induced failures are often observed in engineering components operating under high temperature and cyclic loading. Understanding the creep-fatigue damage process and identifying failure root cause are very important for preventing such failures and improving the lifetime of engineering components. Finite element analyses including a heat transfer analysis and a creep-fatigue analysis were conducted to model the cyclic thermal and mechanical process of a furnace roll in a continuous hot-dip coating line. Typically, the roll has a short life, <1 year, which has been a problem for a long time. The failure occurred in the weld joining an end bell to a roll shell and resulted in the complete 360° separation of the end bell from the roll shell. The heat transfer analysis was conducted to predict the temperature history of the roll by modeling heat convection from hot air inside the furnace. The creep-fatigue analysis was performed by inputting the predicted temperature history and applying mechanical loads. The analysis results showed that the failure was resulted from a creep-fatigue mechanism rather than a creep mechanism. The difference of material properties between the filler metal and the base metal is the root cause for the roll failure, which induces higher creep strain and stress in the interface between the weld and the HAZ.

Keywords

crack creep fatigue finite element analysis welding 

References

  1. 1.
    M.H. Sabour and R.B. Bhat, Lifetime Prediction in Creep-Fatigue Environment, Mater. Sci., 2008, 26(3), p 563–584Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Ohtani, T. Kitamura, M. Tsutsumi, H. Miki, Initiation and Growth of Small Cracks in Creep Fatigue of an Oxide Dispersion-Strengthened Superalloy at Elevated Temperature, in Asian Pacific Conference of Fracture and Strength, Japan, 1993, p 151–156Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Ewald, S. Sheng, A. Klenk, and G. Schellenberg, Engineering Guide to Assessment of Creep Crack Initiation on Components by Two Criteria Diagram, Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., 2001, 78, p 937–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Marie and C. Delaval, Fatigue and Creep-Fatigue Growth in 316 Stainless Steel Cracked Plates at 650°C, Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., 2001, 78, p 847–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Ehrhardt, S.R. Holdsworth, I. Kühn, and E. Mazza, Creep Fatigue Crack Development in Dissimilar Metal Welded Joints between Steels and Nickel Based Alloy, Energy Mater. Mater. Sci. Eng. Energy Syst., 2013, 8(3), p 327–331Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Vacchieri, S.R. Holdsworth, A. Cost, E. Poggio, A. Riva, and P. Villari, Creep-Fatigue Interaction in Two Gas Turbine Ni Based Superalloys Subjected to Service-Like Conditions, Mater. High Temp., 2014, 31(4), p 348–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D.M. Ji, L.C. Zhang, J. Ren, and D. Wang, Creep-Fatigue Interaction and Cyclic Strain Analysis in P92 Steel Based on Test, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2015, 24(4), p 1441–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.O. Karl, Thermomechanical Fatigue Life Prediction of Notched 304 Stainless Steel, University of Central Florida, Ph.D. Dissertation, 2013Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.P. Rouse, W. Sun, T.H. Hyde, and A. Morris, Comparative Assessment of Several Creep Damage Models for Use in Life Prediction, Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., 2013, 108–109, p 81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.R. Holdsworth, A Knowledge Based System for Creep-Fatigue Assessment, Nucl. Eng. Design, 1999, 188(3), p 289–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Nikbin, Creep/Fatigue Crack Growth Testing, Modeling and Component Life Assessment of Welds, Procedia Eng., 2013, 55, p 380–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D.M. Ji, M.-H.H. Shen, D.X. Wang, and J.X. Ren, Creep-Fatigue Life Prediction and Reliability Analysis of P91 Steel Based on Applied Mechanical Work Density, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014, 24(1), p 194–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S.P. Zhu, H.Z. Huang, Y. Liu, R. Yuan, and L. He, An efficient Life Prediction Methodology for Low Cycle Fatigue-Creep Based on Ductility Exhaustion Theory, Int. J. Damage Mech., 2012, 22(4), p 556–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    W.Z. Wang, P. Buhl, A. Klenk, and Y.Z. Liu, Study of Creep-Fatigue Behavior In a 1000 MW Rotor Using a Unified Viscoplastic Constitutive Model With Damage, Int. J. Damage Mech., 2015, doi: 10.1177/1056789515576766 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Iwamoto, E. Murakami, and T. Sawa, A Finite Element Simulation on Creep Behavior in Welded Joint of Chrome-Molybdenum Steel Including Interaction Between Void Evolution and Dislocation Dynamics, TechnischeMechanik, 2010, 30(1–3), p 157–168Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. Segle, T.T. Tu, J. Storesund, and L.A. Samuelson, Some Issue In Life Assessment of Longitudinal Seam Weld Based on Creep Test with Cross-Weld Specimens, Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., 1996, 66(1–3), p 199–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Gurumurthy, B. Srinivasan, P.S. Krishna, G.G.S. Achary, and S.V.R. Subramanyam, Creep-Fatigue Design Studies for Process Reactor Components Subjected to Elevated Temperature Service as per ASME-NH, Procedia Eng., 2014, 86, p 327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Sheridan, D. Knowles, O. Montgomery, Comparison of R5 and ASME NH Creep-Fatigue Damage Assessment Methodologies, in ASME 2013 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 2013, 1A, PVP2013-97625, doi: 10.1115/PVP2013-97625
  19. 19.
    R.A. Ainsworth, R5 Procedures for Assessing Structural Integrity of Components under Creep and Creep-Fatigue Conditions, Int. Mater. Rev., 2006, 51(2), p 107–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    D.M. Knowles, R5 High Temperature Creep-Fatigue Life Assessment for Austenitic Weldments, Procedia Eng., 2014, 86, p 315–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    British Stainless Steel Association, Elevated Temperature Physical Properties of Stainless Steels, http://www.bssa.org.uk/topics.php?article=139
  22. 22.
    Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, ATI 309TM/ATI 309STM/ATI 310TM/ATI310STM, Technical Data Sheet, https://www.atimetals.com/Documents/ati_309_309s_310_310s_tds_en3_1_v1.pdf
  23. 23.
    Duraloy Technologies, Material Specification MO-RE 1 Alloy, www.duraloy.com.
  24. 24.
    Harald Pihl AB, Ni-Cr-Co-Mo Welding Electrode, INCONEL Welding Electrode 117, http://www.haraldpihl.com/attachments/119_Inconel%20WE%20117.pdf
  25. 25.
    Y.P. Yang, F.W. Brust, and J. Oh, Creep Behavior of a Bimetallic Welded Joint in a Nuclear Piping System, ASME 2003 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, July 20–24, 2003, PVP2003-2045, p 35–42Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Simulia, ABAQUS 6.14 user’s guide, 2014.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    F.R.N. Nabarro, Do We Have an Acceptable Model of Power-Law Creep?, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, 387–389, p 659–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    F.W. Brust, P.M. Scott, and Y.P. Yang, Weld Residual Stresses and Crack Growth In Bimetallic Pipe Welds, in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (ed. S. Vejvoda), Prague, Czech Republic, August, 2003, http://www.iasmirt.org/SMiRT17/G08-1.pdf

Copyright information

© ASM International 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EWIColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations