Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 1358–1365 | Cite as

Effect of Strength and Microstructure on Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior and Mechanism of X80 Pipeline Steel in High pH Carbonate/Bicarbonate Solution

  • Min Zhu
  • Cuiwei Du
  • Xiaogang Li
  • Zhiyong Liu
  • Shengrong Wang
  • Tianliang Zhao
  • Jinghuan Jia


The stress corrosion cracking (SCC) behaviors and mechanisms of X80 pipeline steels with different strength and microstructure in high pH carbonate/bicarbonate solution were investigated by slow strain rate testing and electrochemical test. The results showed that the cracking mode of low strength X80 steel composed of bulky polygonal ferrite and granular bainite in high pH solution was intergranular (IGSCC), and the SCC mechanism was anodic dissolution (AD). While the mixed cracking mode of high strength X80 steel consisted of fine acicular ferrite and granular bainite was intergranular (IGSCC) in the early stage, and transgranular (TGSCC) in the later stage. The decrease of pH value of crack tip was probably the key reason for the occurrence of TGSCC. The SCC mechanism may be a mixed mode of AD and hydrogen embrittlement (HE), and the HE mechanism may play a significant role in the deep crack propagation at the later stage. The cracking modes and SCC mechanisms of the two X80 steels were associated with its microstructure and strength.


X80 pipeline steel stress corrosion cracking strength and microstructure hydrogen embrittlement 



The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Registration No. 51371036 and No. 51131001).


  1. 1.
    G. Van Boven, W. Chen, and R. Rogge, The Role of Residual Stress in Neutral pH Stress Corrosion Cracking of Pipeline Steels. Part I: Pitting and Cracking Occurrence, Acta. Mater., 2007, 55(1), p 29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G.A. Zhang and Y.F. Cheng, Micro-Electrochemical Characterization of Corrosion of Pre-cracked X70 Pipeline Steel in a Concentrated Carbonate/Bicarbonate Solution, Corros. Sci., 2010, 52, p 960–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Mustapha, E.A. Charles, and D. Hardie, Evaluation of Environment-Assisted Cracking Susceptibility of a Grade X100 Pipeline Steel, Corros. Sci., 2012, 54, p 5–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.A. Oskuie, T. Shahrabi, A. Shahriari, and E. Saebnoori, Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Analysis of X70 Pipeline Steel Stress Corrosion Cracking in High pH Carbonate Solution, Corros. Sci., 2012, 61, p 111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.A. Aran and J.A. Szpunar, Effect of Bainitic Microstructure on the Susceptibility of Pipeline Steels to Hydrogen Induced Cracking, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, 528, p 4927–4940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y.W. Kang, W.X. Chen, R. Kania, G.V. Boven, and R. Worthingham, Simulation of Crack Growth During Hydrostatic Testing of Pipeline Steel in Near-Neutral pH Environment, Corros. Sci., 2011, 53, p 968–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B.T. Lu, J.L. Luo, and P.R. Norton, Environmentally Assisted Cracking Mechanism of Pipeline Steel in Near-Neutral pH Groundwater, Corros. Sci., 2010, 52, p 1787–1795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. SadeghiMeresht, T. ShahrabiFarahani, and J. Neshati, Failure Analysis of Stress Corrosion Cracking Occurred in A Gas Transmission Steel Pipeline, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2011, 18, p 963–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T.R. Jack, B. Erno, K. Krist, and R. Fessler, Generation of Near Neutral pH and High pH SCC Environments on Buried Pipelines, Proceedings of Corrosion 2000. Paper 00362. NACE International, Houston, TX, 2000 (Corrosion 2000. Paper No. 363, NACE, Houston, 2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Manfredi and J.L. Otegui, Failure by SCC in Buried Pipelines, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2002, 9, p 495–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.A. Arafin and J.A. Szpunar, A New Understanding of Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking Resistance of Pipeline Steel Through Grain Boundary Character and Crystallographic Texture Studies, Corros. Sci., 2009, 51, p p119–p128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.N. Parkins, Jr., E.K. Blanchard, and E.S. Delanty, Transgranular Stress Corrosion Cracking of High-Pressure Pipelines in Contact with Solutions of Near Neutral pH, Corrosion, 1994, 50(5), p 394–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Chen, F. King, and E. Vokes, Characteristics of Near-Neutral-pH Stress Corrosion Cracks in An X-65 Pipeline, Corrosion, 2002, 58(3), p 267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.J. Park, S.I. Pyun, K.H. Na, S.M. Lee, and Y.T. Kho, Effect of Passivity of the Oxide Film in Low-pH Stress Corrosion Cracking of API5LX-65 Pipeline Steel in Bicarbonate Solution, Corrosion, 2002, 58(4), p 329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    B.Y. Fang, A. Atrens, J.Q. Wang, E.H. Han, Z.Y. Zhu, and W. Ke, Review of Stress Corrosion Cracking of Pipeline Steels in “Low” and “High” pH Solutions, J. Mater. Sci., 2003, 38(1), p 127–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.N. Parkins, Mechanistic Aspects of Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking of Ferritic Steels, Corrosion, 1996, 52(5), p 363–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    B.T. Lu, F. Song, M. Gao, and M. Elboujdaini, Crack Growth Model for Pipelines Exposed to Concentrated Carbonate-Bicarbonate Solution with High pH, Corros. Sci., 2010, 52, p 4064–4072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M.C. Li and Y.F. Cheng, Corrosion of the Stressed Pipe Steel in Carbonate-Bicarbonate Solution Studied by Scanning Localized Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, Electrochim. Acta, 2008, 53, p 2831–2836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    F.M. Song, Predicting the Mechanisms and Crack Growth Rates of Pipelines Undergoing Stress Corrosion Cracking at High pH, Corros. Sci., 2009, 51, p 2657–2674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    C. Lea, Stress Corrosion Cracking and Temper Brittleness Effect of Phosphorus Grain Boundary Segregation in Low-Alloy Steel, Met. Sci., 1980, 14, p 107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    G. Trauber and H.J. Grabke, Electrochemical and Auger-Spectroscopic Studies on the Intergranular Corrosion of Iron in Nitrate Solutions, Corros. Sci., 1979, 19, p 793–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. Flis, The Passivation of Iron-Carbon Alloys in Acidic Phosphate Solution and Its Relation to Stress Corrosion Cracking, Corros. Sci., 1985, 25, p 317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J.Q. Wang, A. Atrens, D.R. Cousens, P.M. Kelly, C. Nockolds, and S. Bulcock, Measurement of Grain Boundary Composition for X52 Pipeline Steel, Acta Mater., 1998, 46, p 5677–5687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J.Q. Wang, A. Atrens, D.R. Cousens, C. Nockolds, and S. Bulcock, Boundary Characterisation of X65 Pipeline Steel Using Analytical Electron Microscopy, J. Mater. Sci., 1999, 34, p 1711–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J.Q. Wang, A. Atrens, D.R. Cousens, and N.N. Kinaev, Microstructure of X52 and X65 Pipeline Steels, J. Mater. Sci., 1999, 34, p 1721–1728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J.Q. Wang, A. Atrens, and D.R.G. Mitchell, Grain Boundary Characterization of X42 Pipeline Steel in Relation to IGSCC, Proceedings of Corrosion 2001. Paper 01210. NACE International, Houston, TX, 2001 (Corrosion 2001. Paper No. 210, NACE, Houston, 2001)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    M.J. Danielson, R.H. Jones, and P. Dusek, Effect of Microstructure and Microchemistry on the SCC Behavior of Archival and Modern Pipeline Steels in A High pH Environment, Proceedings of Corrosion 2001. Paper 01211. NACE International, Houston, TX, 2001 (Corrosion 2001. Paper No. 211, NACE, Houston, 2001)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    P. Liang, Corrosion Behavior and Mechanism of X80 Pipeline Steel in Ku’erle Soil Simulated Solution. PhD Thesis, University of Science and Technology Beijing 2008 [in Chinese]Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    B. Kumkum and U.K. Chatterjee, Hydrogen Permeation and Hydrogen Content Under Cathodic Charging in HSLA 80 and HSLA 100 Steels, Scripta Mater., 2001, 44(2), p 213–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chinese National Standard for Stress Corrosion Cracking Tests, GB T 15970, 2007Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Z.F. Wang and A. Atrens, Initiation of Stress Corrosion Cracking for Pipeline Steels in a Carbonate-Bicarbonate Solution, Metall. Mater. Trans., 1996, 27A, p 2686–2691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    A.K. Pilkey, S.B. Lambert, and A. Plumtree, Stress Corrosion Cracking of X-60 Line Pipe Steel in a Carbonate-Bicarbonate Solution, Corrosion, 1995, 51(2), p 91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    R.B. Rebak, Z. Xia, R. Safruddin, and S. Szklarska-Smialowska, Effect of Solution Composition and Electrochemical Potential on Stress Corrosion Cracking of X-52 Pipeline Steel, Corrosion, 1996, 52(5), p 396–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    J. Li, M. Elboujdaini, B. Fang, R.W. Revie, and M.W. Phaneuf, Microscopy Study Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking of X-52 Line Pipe Steel, Corrosion, 2006, 62(4), p 316–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    J.Q. Wang and A. Atrens, SCC Initiation for X65 Pipeline Steel in the “High” pH Carbonate/Bicarbonate Solution, Corros. Sci., 2003, 45(10), p 2199–2217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    C.F. Dong, X.G. Li, Z.Y. Liu, and Y.R. Zhang, Hydrogen-Induced Cracking and Healing Behaviour of X70 Steel, J. Alloys Compd., 2009, 484, p 966–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    W.L. Zheng, Effect of Strength of Steels on the Susceptibility to Stress Corrosion Cracking, J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 1984, 4, p 287–294 ((in Chinese))Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    W. Wang, Y.Y. Shan, and K. Yang, Study of High Strength Pipeline Steels with Different Microstructures, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, 502, p 38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Z.P. Lu, T. Shoji, Y. Takeda, Y. Ito, A. Kai, and N. Tsuchiya, Effects of Loading Mode and Water Chemistry on Stress Corrosion Crack Growth Behavior of 316L HAZ and Weld Metal Materials in High Temperature Pure Water, Corros. Sci., 2008, 50, p 625–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    H. Hoffmeister, Modeling the Effects of Local Anodic Acidification on Stress Corrosion Cracking of Nickel, Corrosion, 2011, 67, p 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    B.G. Ateya and H.W. Pickering, The Distribution of Anodic and Cathodic Reaction Sites During Environmentally Assisted Cracking, Corros. Sci., 1995, 37, p 1443–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    H. Guo, G.F. Li, X. Cai, and W. Yang, Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior of X70 Pipeline Steel in Near-Neutral pH Solutions at Different Temperatures, Acta Metall. Sin., 2004, 40, p 967–971 ((in Chinese))Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    I.M. Dmytrakh, Corrosion Fracture of Structural Metallic Materials: Effect of Electrochemical Conditions in Crack, Strain, 2011, 47, p 427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    X. Tang and Y.F. Cheng, Quantitative Characterization by Micro-electrochemical Measurements of the Synergism of Hydrogen, Stress and Dissolution on Near-Neutral pH Stress Corrosion Cracking of Pipelines, Corros. Sci., 2011, 53, p 2927–2933CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Min Zhu
    • 1
  • Cuiwei Du
    • 1
  • Xiaogang Li
    • 1
  • Zhiyong Liu
    • 1
  • Shengrong Wang
    • 1
  • Tianliang Zhao
    • 1
  • Jinghuan Jia
    • 1
  1. 1.Corrosion and Protection Center, School of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations