Advertisement

The Nature of Interfaces in Al-1050/Al-1050 and Al-1050/Mg-AZ31 Couples Joined by Magnetic Pulse Welding (MPW)

  • A. Stern
  • M. Aizenshtein
  • G. Moshe
  • S. R. Cohen
  • N. Frage
Article

Abstract

The microstructure and the phase composition of the interfaces of Al-1050/Al-1050 and Al-1050/Mg-AZ31 magnetic pulse welding (MPW) joints were characterized by SEM and TEM analyses. The mechanical properties were tested by nanoindentation. Properties of the Al-1050/Al-1050 interface joint were established. The interface is almost free from Al3Fe precipitates, which are present in the base metal. The hardness value is higher than that of the base metal; however, values of the Young’s modulus of the interface and base metal are similar. It was suggested that the interface evolution in the Al-1050/Al-1050 system includes local melting and rapid solidification of the base materials. A wavy shaped heterogeneous interface was detected in the Al-1050/Mg-AZ31 joints. Some areas are free from visible intermetallic phases (IMPs), while others contain pockets of relatively coarse intermetallic precipitates. The presence of a relatively large fraction of globular porosity at the interface indicates that local melting takes place in the course of MPW. TEM characterization of regions free of IMPs at the interface reveals regions consisting of fcc supersaturated Al-Mg solid solution, apparently formed as a result of local mechanical alloying during MPW. In other regions, the composition and structure correspond to the Mg17Al12 phase, which was probably formed by local melting and rapid solidification.

Keywords

Al and Mg alloys elastic modulus interfaces MPW nanoindentation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their thanks to Dr. Vladimir Ezersky for the TEM analysis and Dr. A. Ben-Artzy for the fruitful discussions.

References

  1. 1.
    Y. Zhang, S.S. Babu, C. Prothe, M. Blakely, J. Kwasegroch, M. LaHa, and G.S. Daehn, Application of High Velocity Impact Welding at Varied Different Length Scales, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2011, 211(5), p 944–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Stern and M. Aizenshtein, Bonding Zone Formation in Magnetic Pulse Welds, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2002, 7(5), p 339–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Ben-Artzy, A. Stern, N. Frage, and V. Shribman, Interface Phenomena in Aluminum Magnesium Magnetic Pulse Welding, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2008, 13(4), p 402–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Ben-Artzy, A. Stern, N. Frage, V. Shribman, and O. Sadot, Wave Formation Mechanism in Magnetic Pulse Welding, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2010, 37(4), p 397–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Stern and M. Aizenshtein, Magnetic Pulse Welding of Al to Mg Alloys: Structural-Mechanical Properties of the Interfacial Layer, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2011, 27(12), p 1809–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.S. Bahrani, T.J. Black, and B. Crossland, The Mechanics of Wave Formation in Explosive Welding, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A: Math. Phys. Sci., 1967, 296(1445), p 123–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.A.A. Akbari Mousavi and S.T.S. Al-Hassani, Numerical and Experimental Studies of the Mechanism of the Wavy Interface Formations in Explosive/Impact Welding, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2005, 53(11), p 2501–2528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Zhang, S.S. Babu, and G.S. Daehn, Interfacial Ultrafine-Grained Structures on Aluminum Alloy 6061 Joint and Copper Alloy 110 Joint Fabricated by Magnetic Pulse Welding, J. Mater. Sci., 2010, 45(17), p 4645–4651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.L. Robinson, Fluid Mechanics of Copper: Viscous Energy Dissipation in Impact Welding, J. Appl. Phys., 1977, 48(6), p 2202–2207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T.A. Palmer, J.W. Elmer, D. Brasher, D. Butler, and R. Riddle, Development of an Explosive Welding Process for Producing High-Strength Welds Between Niobium and 6061-T651 Aluminum, Weld. J., 2006, 85(11), p 252s–263sGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Kacar and M. Acarer, An investigation on the Explosive Cladding of 316L Stainless Steel, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2004, 152(1), p 91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Göbel, J. Kaspar, T. Herrmannsdörfer, B. Brenner, and E. Beyer, Insights into Intermetallic Phases on Pulse Welded Dissimilar Metal Joints, 4th International Conference on High Speed Forming, 2010, p 127–136Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. Shribman, A. Stern, Y. Livshitz, and O. Gafri, Magnetic Pulse Welding Produces High-Strength Aluminum Welds, Weld. J., 2002, 81(4), p 33–37Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Marya, S. Marya, and D. Priem, On the Characteristics of Electromagnetic Welds Between Aluminum and Other Metals and Alloys, Weld. World, 2005, 49, p 74–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    W.C. Oliver and G.M. Pharr, An Improved Technique for Determining Hardness and Elastic Modulus Using Load and Displacement Sensing Indentation Experiments, J. Mater. Res., 1992, 7(6), p 1564–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Kaneko, T. Hata, T. Tokunaga, and Z. Horita, Fabrication and Characterization of Supersaturated Al-Mg Alloys by Severe Plastic Deformation and Their Mechanical Properties, Mater. Trans., 2009, 50(1), p 76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Singh, C. Suryanarayana, L. Mertus, and R.H. Chen, Extended Homogeneity Range of Intermetallic Phases in Mechanically Alloyed Mg-Al Alloys, Intermetallics, 2003, 11, p 373–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Stern
    • 1
  • M. Aizenshtein
    • 2
  • G. Moshe
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. R. Cohen
    • 3
  • N. Frage
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Materials EngineeringBen-Gurion UniversityBeer-ShebaIsrael
  2. 2.NRC-NegevBeer-ShebaIsrael
  3. 3.Department of Chemical Research SupportWeismann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations