Finite Element Prediction of Creep-Plastic Ratchetting and Low Cycle Creep-Fatigue for a Large SPF Tool

Article
  • 141 Downloads

Abstract

Industrial experience shows that large superplastic forming (SPF) tools suffer from distortion due to thermal cycling, which apparently causes high temperature creep and plasticity. In addition to distortion, thermomechanical fatigue and fatigue-creep interaction can lead to cracking. The aim of this study is to predict the life-limiting thermomechanical behavior of a large SPF tool under realistic forming conditions using elastic-plastic-creep FE analyses. Nonlinear time-dependent, sequentially coupled FE analyses are performed using temperature-dependent monotonic and cyclic material data for a high-nickel, high-chromium tool material, XN40F (40% Ni and 20% Cr). The effect of monotonic and cyclic material data is compared vis-à-vis the anisothermal, elastic-plastic-stress response of the SPF tool. An uncoupled cyclic plasticity-creep material model is employed. Progressive deformation (ratchetting) is predicted locally, transverse to the predominant direction of the creep-fatigue cycling, but at the same spatial location, due to creep and cyclic plasticity, during the so-called minor cycles, which correspond to comparatively small-amplitude temperature changes associated with opening of the press doors during part loading and unloading operations.

Keywords

creep ratchetting heating-cooling cycles major cycle minor cycle part-forming cycles plastic shakedown superplastic forming thermomechanical fatigue and creep 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Ian Leaver and John Chippendale of BAE Systems, Salmesbury for helpful discussions. The first author would also like to thank BAE Systems for funding.

References

  1. 1.
    G. Bernhart, F. Nazaret, A. Martinier, C. Gao, D. Garriga-Majo, T. Cutard, and P. Lours, Design of SPF Dies Based on Advanced Material Behaviour Models, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2004, 447–448, p 123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C.Y. Gao, P. Lours, and G. Bernhart, Thermomechanical Stress Analysis of Superplastic Forming Tools, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2005, 169, p 281–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Shang, S.B. Leen, and T.H. Hyde, Finite Element Based Methodology for Predicting the Thermomechanical Behaviour of Superplastic Forming Tools, Proc. IMechE, Part L: J. Mater.: Des. Appl., 2006, 220(L3), p 113–123Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Shang, S.B. Leen, and T.H. Hyde, Finite Element Based Life Prediction for High Temperature Cyclic Loading of a Large Superplastic Forming Die, J. Strain Anal., 2006, 41(8), p 539–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Shang, “Thermo-Mechanical Life Assessment of Superplastic Forming Tools,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham, September 2005Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Kang and Q. Kan, Constitutive Modelling for Uniaxial Time-Dependent Ratchetting of SS304 Stainless Steel, Mech. Mater., 2007, 39(5), p 488–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Kapoor, A Re-Evaluation of the Life to Rupture of Ductile Metals by Cyclic Plastic Strain, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1994, 17(2), p 201–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Bejan, Heat Transfer, John Wiley and Sons, 1993Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ABAQUS User and Theory Manuals, Version 6.5, HKS Inc., Rhode Island, US, 2004Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A.A. Deshpande, S.B. Leen, and T.H. Hyde, Finite Element Based Predictions of Life Limiting Behaviour for a Large SPF Tool, Materwiss. Werksttech., 2008, 39(4–5), p 309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Hübel, Basic Conditions for Material and Structural Ratchetting, Nucl. Eng. Des., 1996, 162(1), p 55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Materials, Mechanics and StructuresUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and InformaticsNational University of IrelandGalwayIreland

Personalised recommendations