Eliminating springback error in U-shaped part forming by variable blankholder force
Springback is the main concern in U-shaped part forming, which would adversely affect desired part geometries. The use of variable blankholder force in the forming process is one effective method to reduce springback. However, there has not been a systematic way to determine the blankholder force trajectory. In this article, a methodology of obtaining this blankholder force trajectory in forming a U-shaped part that considers the wrinkling limit and fracture limit in the forming process was proposed. The method was validated numerically by using the Finite Element Method to simulate the benchmark of a 2-D draw bending problem in NUMISHEET’93. With the calculated blankholder force trajectory, higher forming quality was obtained and compared with constant blankholder force cases. Springback was kept at a minimum while avoiding cracking.
Keywordssheet metal forming springback U-shaped part variable blankholder force
- 1.Y.Y. Yang: Complicated Sheet Metal Forming Technology, National Defense Publication, Piking, 1996, pp. 106–7.Google Scholar
- 2.M. Kawka, A. Makinouchi, and S.P. Wang: “Simulating Manufacturing Processes,” Automotive Engineering, 1997, 105(4), pp. 31–33.Google Scholar
- 3.K. Kazama, T. Nukaga, and H. Makino: “Springback Simulation of Truck’s Frame Side Member” in Proceedings of NUMISHEET’99, J.C. Gelin and P. Picart, ed., University of the Franche-Comte and ENSMM Besancon, 1999, pp. 65–70.Google Scholar
- 6.M. Sunseri, J. Cao, and A.P. Karafillis: “Accommodation of Springback Error in Channel Forming Using Active Blankholder Force Control: Numerical Simulations and Experiments.” J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 1996, 118(3), pp. 426–35.Google Scholar
- 7.R. Ruffini and J. Cao: “Using Neural Network for Springback Minimization in a Channel Forming Process.” Proceedings of the 1998 SAE International Congress & Exposition, 1998, pp. 77–85.Google Scholar