Journal of Electronic Materials

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 579–582 | Cite as

Electrical properties of HgCdTe epilayers doped with silver using an AgNO3 solution

  • M. Tanaka
  • K. Ozaki
  • H. Nishino
  • H. Ebe
  • Y. Miyamoto
Special Issue Paper

Abstract

We employed AgNO3 solutions for doping Ag in liquid phase epitaxy (LPE) grown Hg0.78Cd0.22Te epilayers and found that the minority carrier lifetimes became longer so that the diode properties improved. After annealing LPE grown Hg(1-x)Cd(x)Te layers (x=0.22) in Hg atmosphere, the epilayers were immersed in an AgNO3 solution at room temperature. The typical carrier concentrations of holes was 3 × 1016 cm−3 at 77K. These values were almost the same as for the nondoped wafers. Also, its acceptor level was 3 to 4 meV. This shows that the Ag was activated. The doped crystals have lifetimes several times longer than those of the nondoped crystals. Numerical fitting showed the lifetime was limited mostly by the Auger 7 process. The Shockley-Read-Hall recombination process was not effective. To examine the Ag-doped wafer, we fabricated photodiodes using standard planar technology. The diodes have an average zero-bias resistance of several MΩ and a shunt resistance of about 1 GΩ for a 10 µm cutoff wavelength at 78K. These values are about four times higher than those of nondoped diodes. The photo current is also two times higher at the same pixel size. This shows that the quantum efficiency is increased. The extension of the lifetime contributes to the high resistance and the high quantum efficiency of the photodiode.

Key words

HgCdTe impurity doped minority carrier lifetime photodiode 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M.L. Wroge, D.J. Peterman, B.J. Morris, D.J. Leopold, J.G. Broerman and B.J. Feldman, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 6 (4), 2826 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Tregilgas and B. Gnade, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 3 (1), 156 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Yoshikawa, S. Ueda, K. Maruyama and H. Takigawa, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 3 (1), 153 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Yoshikawa, J. Appl. Phys. 63 (5), 1533 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L.O. Bubulac, W.E. Tennant, R.A. Riedel, J. Bajaj and D.D. Edwall, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1 (3), 1646 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.C. Chen, J. Appl. Phys. 64 (2), 945 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.C. Chen, L. Colombo, J.A. Dodge and J.H. Tregilgas, J. Electron. Mater. 24 (5), 539 (1995).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Akira Uedono, Kazuo Ozaki, Hiroji Ebe, Tsuyoshi Moriya, Shoichiro Tanigawa, Kosaku Yamamoto and Yoshihiro Miyamoto, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36 (11), 6661 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Toshio Kanno, Minoru Saga, Nobuyuki Kajihara, Kenji Awamoto, Gen Sudo, Yuichiro Ito and Hiroyuki Ishizaki, Proc. of SPIE, 2020, (SPIE, 1993), p. 49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS-The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Tanaka
    • 1
  • K. Ozaki
    • 1
  • H. Nishino
    • 1
  • H. Ebe
    • 1
  • Y. Miyamoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd.AtsugiJapan

Personalised recommendations