Advertisement

Journal of Electronic Materials

, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp 3105–3114 | Cite as

Quantum Phase Transition in Phosphate Glasses Containing Multiple Transition Metal Oxides

  • Mark Henderson
  • Rudra P. Bhatta
  • Andreza M. Eufrasio
  • Ian L. Pegg
  • Biprodas DuttaEmail author
Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

The evidence for a Mott–Hubbard type metal–insulator transition (MIT) is presented in the xP2O5− yV2O5− (100− x − y)WO3 glass system (PVW) at a critical concentration of tungsten (W) ions. Electrons contributed by the reduced vanadium (V) and tungsten (W) ions are self-trapped to form small polarons, and the hopping motion of such charge carriers is the universally accepted transport mechanism. Whereas both the V and W ions are present in multiple oxidation states in these glasses, charges at the V4+ (reduced) sites contribute only to electrical conduction. We demonstrate that, in PVW glasses, electrons at the reduced tungsten sites are too strongly localized to contribute to electrical conduction, but the oxidized state still contributes an available orbital for electrons to tunnel through. This secondary contribution of the tungsten ions greatly facilitates small polaron hopping (SPH) conductivity. With decreasing vanadium concentration [nV= V/(V + W), where V and W are the molar concentrations of V and W ions in this equation], as the inter-atomic distance between V ions increases, the resistivity remains invariant in the composition range 0.5 < nV < 1. However, a sharp increase in resistivity is observed at nV ∼ 0.5, when the tungsten localization radius collapses drastically. Such a transition is similar to the Mott–Hubbard type MIT observed in many crystalline systems. We have demonstrated that MIT in PVW glasses occurs at a critical VV distance, drastically changing the transfer integral between V sites and forcing conduction to take place through the deeper and energetically disfavored tungsten orbitals.

Keywords

Conduction in glasses small polaron hopping electron–phonon interaction mixed polaron effect Mott–Hubbard transition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    B. Dutta, N.A. Fahmy, and I.L. Pegg, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 351, 24 (2005).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Dutta, N.A. Fahmy, and I.L. Pegg, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 351, 30 (2005).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Dutta, N.A. Fahmy, and I.L. Pegg, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 352, 21 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Dutta and I.L. Pegg, J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 112, 5 (2004).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Dutta, and I.L. Pegg, Ceram. India Int. 3, N (2009).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Annamalai, R.P. Bhatta, I.L. Pegg, and B. Dutta, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 358, 11 (2012).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.H. Doremus, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 57, 11 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    N.F. Mott, Conduction in Non-Crystalline Materials, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993), pp. 19–102.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Emin, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 511, 8 (1972).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    I.G. Austin, and N.F. Mott, Adv. Phys., 18:71, 41 (1969).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Al-Shahrani, A. Al-Hajry, and M.M. El-Desoky, Phys. Status Solidi (A), 200:2, 378 (2003).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W.J. Chung, K.H. Kim, Y.G. Choi, and D.W. Shin, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93, 8 (2010).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L.J. Van der Pauw, Philips Research Reports 13, 1 (1958).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D.S. Volzhenskii and V.G. Savitskii, Sov Phys J 18, 6 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.A. Ouis, H.A. El-Batal, M.A. Azooz, and A.M. Abdelghany, IJPAP 51, 11 (2013).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Henderson
    • 1
  • Rudra P. Bhatta
    • 1
  • Andreza M. Eufrasio
    • 1
  • Ian L. Pegg
    • 1
  • Biprodas Dutta
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Vitreous State LaboratoryThe Catholic University of AmericaWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations