Advertisement

Journal of Electronic Materials

, Volume 47, Issue 10, pp 5666–5670 | Cite as

Strain Analysis of CdTe on InSb Epitaxial Structures Using X-ray-Based Reciprocal Space Measurements and Dynamical Diffraction Simulations

  • Michael Liao
  • Calli Campbell
  • Cheng-Ying Tsai
  • Yong-Hang Zhang
  • Mark Goorsky
U.S. Workshop on Physics and Chemistry of II-VI Materials 2017
  • 95 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. U.S. Workshop on the Physics and Chemistry of II-VI Materials 2017

Abstract

The structural properties of CdTe layers grown by molecular beam epitaxy on (001) InSb substrates were assessed using high-resolution x-ray scattering methods. Triple-axis diffraction measurements and dynamical diffraction theory were employed to determine the strain in the epitaxial layer and at the interface for CdTe layer thicknesses of 1.0 μm and 1.8 μm. Reciprocal space maps were generated around the 004, 115, 224 and 335 reciprocal lattice points (RLP). An alignment procedure is described which ensured all reflections were aligned to the same zone axes. (335) reflections exhibited greater sensitivity to strain relaxation than (115) reflections due to a larger in-plane component; so these were used to better determine the strain state of the layers. Both of our 1.0-μm and 1.8-μm thick samples exhibited no relaxation, showing that pseudomorphic layers formed. Additionally, interference oscillations in the (004) ω:2θ scan of the 1.0-μm CdTe sample were observed. These oscillations were replicated through dynamical diffraction simulations by including a ∼1-nm highly strained interfacial layer. These results are consistent with an earlier electron microscopy study that detected a similar strained layer at a defect-free CdTe/InSb interface. The CdTe lattice parameter and Poisson ratio are determined to be 0.648201 ± 0.000002 nm and 0.408, respectively.

Keywords

X-ray diffraction reciprocal space map epitaxial layer strain analysis II–VI materials 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    I.B. Bhat, K. Patel, N. Taskar, J. Ayres, and S. Ghandhi, J. Cryst. Growth 88, 23 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Polat, O. Ari, O. Öztürk, and Y. Selamet, Mater. Res. Express 4, 035904 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.M. Oliveira, A. Malachias, C.A. Ospina, and S.O. Ferreira, J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 1968 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T.T. Lam, C.D. Moore, R.L. Forrest, M.S. Goorsky, S.M. Johnson, D.B. Leonard, T.A. Strand, T.J. Delyon, and M.D. Gorwitz, J. Electron. Mater. 29, 804 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Li, Y. Wu, J. Poplawsky, T.J. Pennycook, N. Paudel, W. Yin, S.J. Haigh, M.P. Oxley, A.R. Lupini, M. Al-Jassim, S.J. Pennycook, and Y. Yan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 156103 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.J. DiNezza, X. Zhao, S. Lu, A.P. Kirk, and Y.-H. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 193901 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.R. Hess, C.D. Moore, and M.S. Goorsky, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 32, A16 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T.T. Lam, Growth and process-related defects in mercury cadmium telluride heterostructures. M.S. Thesis University of California, Los Angeles, 2001Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.E. Straumanis and C.D. Kim, J. Appl. Phys. 36, 3822 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. Madelung, eds., Semiconductors Other than Group IV Elements and III–V Compounds (Berlin: Springer, 1998).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Lu, M.J. DiNezza, X. Zhao, S. Liu, Y.-H. Zhang, A. Kovacs, R.E. Dunin-Borkowski, and D.J. Smith, J. Cryst. Growth 439, 99 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    RADS Software, Bruker Semiconductor, info.semi@bruker.com.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Liao
    • 1
  • Calli Campbell
    • 2
  • Cheng-Ying Tsai
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yong-Hang Zhang
    • 3
  • Mark Goorsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and EnergyArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  3. 3.School of Electrical, Computer and Energy EngineeringArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations