Journal of Electronic Materials

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 594–603 | Cite as

Influence of Temperature on Plastic Deformation Behavior and Mechanism of Bismuth Single Crystals

  • Yuichi Yanaka
  • Yoshiharu Kariya
  • Hirohiko Watanabe
  • Hiroaki Hokazono
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

Tensile tests were performed on bismuth single crystals in the [0001] (c-axis), [2\(\bar{1}\bar{1} \)0] (a 1-axis), [10\(\bar{1} \)0] and [1\( \bar{1} \)00] directions of bismuth single crystals to investigate the influence of temperature on plastic deformation behavior. The plastic deformation at 298 K was caused by slip on the secondary slip system in the [0001] direction, or by twinning and slip deformation in twins subsequent to the twining deformation in the [2\(\bar{1}\bar{1} \)0] direction. Those mechanisms resulted in ductile characteristics in tension. Only deformation twinning, however, was observed along the [10\(\bar{1}\)0] and [1\(\bar{1} \)00] directions, which lead to brittle fracture. At elevated temperature (423 K), deformation twinning was not found to occur along any of the examined directions. Crystallographic slip was the predominant deformation mechanism along the [2\(\bar{1}\bar{1} \)0], [10\(\bar{1} \)0] and [1\(\bar{1} \)00] directions at 423 K. This is attributed to the activation of the {1\(\bar{1} \)02}<11\(\bar{2} \)0> or {1\(\bar{1} \)02}<1\(\bar{1} \)0\(\bar{1} \)> slip system which are inactive at 298 K. Along the [0001] direction at 423 K, the {0\(\bar{1} \)11}<10\(\bar{1} \)1> was active and its critical resolved shear stress (τ crss) does not coincide with that corresponding to the {1\(\bar{1} \)02}<11\(\bar{2} \)0> and {1\(\bar{1} \)02}<1\(\bar{1} \)0\(\bar{1} \)> systems. Therefore, it can be concluded that difference in τ crss between slip systems causes anisotropy in mechanical behavior at 423 K.

Keywords

Bismuth single crystal mechanical characteristic plastic deformation slip system twin deformation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V. Chidambaram, J. Hattel, and J. Hald, Microelectron. Eng. 88, 981 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Suganuma, S.J. Kim, and K.S. Kim, JOM. J. Miner. Met. Mater. Soc. 61, 64 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.H. Kim, S.W. Jeong, and H.M. Lee, Mater. Trans. 43, 1873 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Takaku, I. Ohnuma, R. Kainuma, Y. Yamada, Y. Yagi, Y. Nishibe, and K. Ishida, J. Electron. Mater. 35, 1926 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.M. Song, H.Y. Chuang, and T.X. Wen, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 38, 1371 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ph Hofmann, Prog. Surf. Sci. 81, 191 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Steegmuller and J.S. Daniel, J. Less Common Met. 27, 81 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W.F. Berg, Nature 134, 143 (1934).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H.J. Gough and H.L. Cox, Nature 137, 701 (1936).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Otake, H. Namazue, and N. Masuno, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 19, 433 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y. Motohashi and S. Otake, J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 37, 978 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. Yanaka, Y. Kariya, H. Watanabe, and H. Hokazono, Mater. Trans. 57, 819 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D.C. Stockbarger, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 7, 133 (1936).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.W. Christian and S. Mahajan, Prog. Mater Sci. 39, 1 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Q. Yu, J. Zhang, and Y.Y. Jiang, Philos. Mag. Lett. 91, 757 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. Stanford, U. Carlson, and M.R. Barnett, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 39, 934 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. Munroe and X. Tan, Scripta Mater. 36, 1383 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M.H. Yoo, Metall. Trans. A 12, 409 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Koike, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 36, 1689 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Yoshinaga and R. Horiuchi, Trans. JIM 4, 1 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Chapuis and J.H. Drivers, Acta Mater. 59, 1986 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    N.E. Paton and W.A. Backofen, Met. Trans. 1, 2839 (1970).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Akhtar, Metall. Trans. A 6, 1105 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M.H. Yoo, C.L. Fu, and J.K. Lee, J. Phys. III France 1, 1065 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    W. Vickers and G.B. Greenough, Nature 178, 536 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    B. Chalmers and U.M. Martius, Proc. R. Soc. A 213, 175 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A.G. Guy and J.J. Hren, Elements of physical metallurgy, 3rd ed. (Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1974), p. 122.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A.G. Guy and J.J. Hren, Elements of physical metallurgy, 3rd ed. (Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1974), pp. 125–127.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    S. Kohda, Introduction to Metal Physics (Corona: Japan, 1973), pp. 162–164.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuichi Yanaka
    • 1
  • Yoshiharu Kariya
    • 2
  • Hirohiko Watanabe
    • 3
  • Hiroaki Hokazono
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate School of Shibaura Institute of Technology, JapanKoto-kuJapan
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringShibaura Institute of TechnologyKoto-kuJapan
  3. 3.Fuji Electric Co., Ltd.Hino-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations