Strain Manipulated Magnetic Properties in ZnO and GaN Induced by Cation Vacancy
- 112 Downloads
Abstract
The effects of isotropic strains on the magnetic properties in ZnO and GaN induced by cation vacancies are comparatively investigated by density functional theory calculations. The magnetic moments and the couplings between vacancies in different charged states are calculated as a function of strains. The modulation of strain on the magnetic properties relies on the materials and the charge states of cation vacancies in them. As the occurrence of charge transfer in ZnO:V Zn under compression, the coupling between \(V_{\rm{Zn}}^{0} \) is antiferromagnetic (AFM) and it could be stabilized by strains. Tensions can strengthen the ferromagnetic (FM) coupling between \(V_{\rm{Zn}}^{0} \) but weaken that of \(V_{\rm{Ga}}^{ - } \). The neutral V Ga are always AFM coupling under strains from −6 to +6% and could be stabilized by compressions. The interactions between \(V_{\rm{Ga}}^{ - } \) are always FM with ignorable variations under strains; however, the FM couplings between \(V_{\rm{Ga}}^{2 - } \) could be strengthened by compressions. These varying trends of magnetic coupling under strains are interpreted by the band coupling models. Therefore, strain-engineering provides a route to manipulate and design high Curie temperature ferromagnetism derived and mediated by intrinsic defect for spintronic applications.
Keywords
Strain cation vacancy diluted magnetic semiconductor density functional theoryPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Acknowledgements
Dr. Yanqin Gai is grateful to Professor Zhenyu Li for helpful discussions. We acknowledge financial supports from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant No. 2010LKWL03, the Special Fund for Theoretical Physics under Grant No. 11047130, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 11104345 and the Key Project of Chinese National Programs for Fundamental Research and Development(973 program) under Grant No. 2011CB302003. We are grateful to the Advanced Analysis and Computation Center of CUMT for the award of CPU hours to accomplish this work.
References
- 1.T. Dietl, H. Ohno, F. Matsukura, J. Cibert, and D. Ferrand, Science 287, 5455 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.H. Pan, J.B. Yi, L. Shen, R.Q. Wu, J.H. Yang, J.Y. Lin, Y.P. Feng, J. Ding, L.H. Van, and J.H. Yin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 127201 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.H.W. Peng, H.J. Xiang, S.-H. Wei, S.S. Li, J.B. Xia, and J.B. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017201 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.P. Dev, Y. Xue, and P. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 117204 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.O. Volnianska and P. Boguslawsk, Phys. Rev. B. 83, 205205 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.L. Shen, R.Q. Wu, H. Pan, G.W. Peng, M. Yang, Z.D. Sha, and Y.P. Feng, Phys. Rev. B. 78, 073306 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.H.F. Sluiter, Y. Kawazoe, P. Sharma, A. Inoue, A.R. Raju, C. Rout, and U.V. Waghmare, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 187204 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.E. Kan, F. Wu, Y.M. Zhang, H.J. Xiang, R.F. Lu, C.Y. Xiao, K.M. Deng, and H.B. Su, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 072401 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.T.M. Ritter, B.A. Weinstein, R.M. Park, and M.C. Tamargo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 964 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.V. Iota and B.A. Weinstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4955 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.X.P. Wang, M.W. Zhao, T. He, Z.H. Wang, and X.D. Liu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 062411 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.H.H. Ren, J.K. Jian, C. Chen, D. Pan, A. Ablat, Y.F. Sun, J. Li, and R. Wu, Appl. Phys. A 116, 185C191 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.H.T. Ren, G. Xiang, G.X. Gu, X. Zhang, W.J. Wang, P. Zhang, B.Y. Wang, and X.Z. Cao, J. Nanomater. 5, 295358 (2012).Google Scholar
- 14.Q. Wang, Q. Sun, G. Chen, Y. Kawazoe, and P. Jena, Phys. Rev. B 77, 205411 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.M. Bououdina, A.A. Dakhel, M. El-Hilo, D.H. Anjum, M.B. Kanoun, and S. Goumri-Said, RSC Adv. 5, 33233 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Y.B. Lu, Y. Dai, W. Wei, Y.T. Zhu, and B.B. Huang, Chem. Phys. Chem. 14, 3916 (2013).Google Scholar
- 17.L. Bergqvist, B. Belhadji, S. Picozzi, and P.H. Dederichs, Phys. Rev. B. 77, 014418 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.N.M. Souza-Neto, D. Haskel, Y.-C. Tseng, and G. Lapertot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 057206 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.I.N. Goncharenko and I. Mirebeau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1082 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.A. Mir, B. Bekkouche, A. Boukortt, S. Kacimi, M. Djermouni, and A. Zaoui, Model. Numer. Simul. Mater. Sci. 2, 37–42 (2012).Google Scholar
- 21.G.M. Dalpian, S.-H. Wei, X.G. Gong, A.J.R. Silva, and A. Fazzio, Solid State Commun. 138, 353 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.J.Y. Zhu, F. Liu, G.B. Stringfellow, and S.-H. Wei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 195503 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.P.E. Blochl, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.H. Monkhorst and J. Pack, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.P. Dev and P.H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 81, 085207 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.W.A. Adeagbo, G. Fischer, A. Ernst, and W. Hergert, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 436002 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.H.W. Peng, J.B. Li, and S.-H. Wei, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 122409 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.J. Kudrnovsky, I. Turek, V. Drchal, F. Mca, P. Weinger, and P. Bruno, Phys. Rev. B 69, 11 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.F. Mca, J. Kudrnovsky, V. Drchal, and G. Bouzerar, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 18–20 (2008).Google Scholar