Journal of Electronic Materials

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 2066–2070 | Cite as

Effect of Doping Concentration Variations in PVT-Grown 4H-SiC Wafers

  • Yu Yang
  • Jianqiu Guo
  • Ouloide Goue
  • Balaji Raghothamachar
  • Michael Dudley
  • Gil Chung
  • Edward Sanchez
  • Jeff Quast
  • Ian Manning
  • Darren Hansen
Article

Abstract

Synchrotron white beam x-ray topography studies carried out on 4H-SiC wafers characterized by locally varying doping concentrations reveals the presence of overlapping Shockley stacking faults generated from residual surface scratches in regions of higher doping concentrations after the wafers have been subjected to heat treatment. The stacking faults are rhombus-shaped and bound by Shockley partial dislocations. The fault generation process is driven by the fact that in regions of higher doping concentrations, a faulted crystal containing double Shockley faults is more stable␣than a perfect 4H-SiC crystal at the high temperatures (>1000°C) that the wafers are subject to during heat treatment. We have developed a model for the formation mechanism of the rhombus-shaped stacking faults. Our studies show that during heat treatment of the wafer, such double Shockley faults can be generated in regions where dislocation sources are presents (e.g. scratches or low-angle boundaries) and when the nitrogen doping concentration exceeds a certain level.

Keywords

4H-SiC double Shockley stacking faults heat treatment x-ray topography doping rhombus-shaped 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Dow Corning. This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source (Beamline 1-BM), a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science user facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by the Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.

References

  1. 1.
    J.A. Cooper, Jr. and A. Agarwal, Proceedings of IEEE, 90(6), p. 956 (2002).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Hornberger, A.B. Lostetter, K.I. Olejniczak, T. McNutt, S. Magan Lal, and A. Mantooth, Proceedings of IEEE Aerospace Conference, 4, 2538 (2004).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.E. Stahlbush, M. Fatemi, J.B. Fedison, S.D. Arthur, L.B. Rowland, and S. Wang, J. Electron. Mater. 31, 370 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.S. Okojie, M. Xhang, P. Pirouz, S. Tumakha, G. Jessen, and L. Brillson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 3056 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T.A. Kuhr, J. Liu, and H.J. Chung, et al., J. Appl. Phys. 92, 5863 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Pirouz, M. Zhang, H.M. Hobgood, M. Lancin, J. Douin, and B. Pichaud, Philos. Mag. 86, 29 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science & EngineeringStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA
  2. 2.Dow Corning Inc.AuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations