Residential Solar Combined Heat and Power Generation using Solar Thermoelectric Generation
- 229 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Abstract
Recent reports on improved efficiencies of solar thermoelectric generation (STEG) systems have generated interest in STEGs as a competitive power generation system. In this paper, the design of a combined cooling and power utilizing concentrated solar power is discussed. Solar radiation is concentrated into a receiver connected to thermoelectric modules, which are used as a topping cycle to generate power and high grade heat necessary to run an absorption chiller. Modeling of the overall system is discussed with experimental data to validate modeling results. A numerical modeling approach is presented which considers temperature variation of the source and sink temperatures and is used to maximize combined efficiency. A system is built with a demonstrated combined efficiency of 32% in actual working conditions with power generation of 3.1 W. Modeling results fell within 3% of the experimental results verifying the approach. An optimization study is performed on the mirror concentration ration and number of modules for thermal load matching and is shown to improve power generation to 26.8 W.
Keywords
Topping cycle module optimization geometry optimum load thermal resistancePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.L. L. N. Laboratory, “Estimated U.S. Energy Use in 2012” (2012).Google Scholar
- 2.D. Kraemer, B. Poudel, H.-P. Feng, J.C. Caylor, B. Yu, X. Yan, Y. Ma, X. Wang, D. Wang, A. Muto, K. McEnaney, M. Chiesa, Z. Ren, and G. Chen, Nat. Mater. 10, 532 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.G. Chen, J. Appl. Phys. 109, 054301 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.T. Yang, J. Xiao, P. Li, P. Zhai, and Q. Zhang, J. Electron. Mater. 40, 967 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.L.A. Weinstein, K. McEnaney, and G. Chen, J. Appl. Phys. 113, 104302 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.L.L. Baranowski, G.J. Snyder, and E.S. Toberer, Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 9055 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.C. Suter, P. Tomes, A. Weidenkaff, and A. Steinfeld, Sol. Energy 85, 1511 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.M. Telkes, J. Appl. Phys. 25, 765 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.K. McEnaney, D. Kraemer, Z. Ren, and G. Chen, J. Appl. Phys. 110, 13261 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.K. Yazawa, Y.R. Koh, and A. Shakouri, Appl. Energy 109, 1 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.R. Amatya and R.J. Ram, J. Electron. Mater. 39, 1735 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.L.L. Baranowski, G. Jeffrey Snyder, and E.S. Toberer, J. Appl. Phys. 113, 204904 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.P. Aranguren, D. Astrain, and M.G. Pérez, Energy 74, 346 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.S.W. Angrist, Direct Energy Conversion (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1965).Google Scholar
- 15.D.M. Rowe, CRC Handbook of Thermoelectrics (Boca Raton: CRC Press Inc, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.M. Gomez, B. Ohara, R. Reid, and H. Lee, J. Electron. Mater. p. 1 (2013).Google Scholar
- 17.P.M. Mayer and R.J. Ram, Nanoscale Microscale Thermophys. Eng. 10, 143 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.R. McCarty, J. Electron. Mater. 42, 1504 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.K. Yazawa and A. Shakouri, J. Appl. Phys. 111, 073113 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.L. Barker, M. Neber, and H. Lee, Sol. Energy 97, 569 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.M. Neber and H. Lee, Energy 47, 481 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.D. Astrain, J.G. Vián, A. Martínez, and A. Rodríguez, Energy 35, 602 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar